Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading

被引:33
|
作者
Su, Chun-Qiu [1 ]
Lu, Shan-Shan [1 ]
Han, Qiu-Yue [1 ]
Zhou, Mao-Dong [1 ]
Hong, Xun-Ning [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guang Zhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Glioma; dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; susceptibility weighted imaging; texture analysis; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; PERFUSION MRI; GLIOBLASTOMA; PARAMETERS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1177/0284185118801127
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The application of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in glioma grading is limited and non-specific. Purpose To investigate the application values of MRI, texture analysis (TA) of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and intratumoral susceptibility signal (ITSS) on susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), alone and in combination, for glioma grading. Material and Methods Fifty-two patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas who underwent DCE-MRI and SWI were enrolled in this retrospective study. Conventional MRIs were evaluated by the VASARI scoring system. TA of DCE-MRI-derived parameters and the degree of ITSS were compared between low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The diagnostic ability of each parameter and their combination for glioma grading were analyzed. Results Significant statistical differences in VASARI features were observed between LGGs and HGGs (P < 0.05), of which the enhancement quality had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.873) with 93.3% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The TA of DCE-MRI derived parameters were significantly different between LGGs and HGGs (P < 0.05), of which the uniformity of K-trans had the highest AUC (0.917) with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The degree of ITSS was significantly different between LGGs and HGGs (P < 0.001). The AUC of the ITSS was 0.925 with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The best discriminative power was obtained from a combination of enhancement quality, K-trans- uniformity, and ITSS, resulting in 96.7% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and AUC of 0.993. Conclusion Combining conventional MRI, TA of DCE-MRI, and ITSS on SWI may help to improve the differentiation between LGGs and HGGs.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 787
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with WHO tumor grading for gliomas
    Lüdemann, L
    Grieger, W
    Wurm, R
    Budzisch, M
    Hamm, B
    Zimmer, C
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (07) : 1231 - 1241
  • [22] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with WHO tumor grading for gliomas
    Lüdemann L.
    Grieger W.
    Wurm R.
    Budzisch M.
    Hamm B.
    Zimmer C.
    European Radiology, 2001, 11 (7) : 1231 - 1241
  • [23] The diagnostic value of combining conventional, diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for salivary gland tumors
    Zheng, Ning
    Li, Rui
    Liu, Wenjuan
    Shao, Shuo
    Jiang, Shan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1089):
  • [24] Glioma grade discrimination with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: An accurate analysis based on MRI guided stereotactic biopsy
    Wu, Juan
    Liang, Zonghui
    Deng, Xiaofei
    Xi, Yan
    Feng, Xiaoyuan
    Yao, Zhenwei
    Shu, Zheng
    Xie, Qian
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 99 : 91 - 97
  • [25] Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in newly presenting glioma
    Jackson, A
    Jayson, GC
    Li, KL
    Zhu, XP
    Checkley, DR
    Tessier, JJL
    Waterton, JC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 76 (903): : 153 - 162
  • [26] Whole-body MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of multiple myeloma
    Julie C. Dutoit
    Koenraad L. Verstraete
    Skeletal Radiology, 2017, 46 : 733 - 750
  • [27] Whole-body MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of multiple myeloma
    Dutoit, Julie C.
    Verstraete, Koenraad L.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (06) : 733 - 750
  • [28] Glioma Grading Capability: Comparisons among Parameters from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and ADC Value on DWI
    Choi, Hyun Seok
    Kim, Ah Hyun
    Ahn, Sung Soo
    Shin, Na-young
    Kim, Jinna
    Lee, Seung-Koo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 14 (03) : 487 - 492
  • [29] Multiscale entropy analysis in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Degenhard, A
    Mutz, M
    Nattkemper, TW
    Saalbach, A
    Twellmann, T
    White, MJ
    Khazen, M
    Pointon, L
    Leach, MO
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2004, 5370 : 868 - 879
  • [30] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI
    Li, Xin
    Huang, Wei
    Holmes, James H.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 32 (01) : 47 - 61