Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading

被引:33
|
作者
Su, Chun-Qiu [1 ]
Lu, Shan-Shan [1 ]
Han, Qiu-Yue [1 ]
Zhou, Mao-Dong [1 ]
Hong, Xun-Ning [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guang Zhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Glioma; dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; susceptibility weighted imaging; texture analysis; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; PERFUSION MRI; GLIOBLASTOMA; PARAMETERS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1177/0284185118801127
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The application of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in glioma grading is limited and non-specific. Purpose To investigate the application values of MRI, texture analysis (TA) of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and intratumoral susceptibility signal (ITSS) on susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), alone and in combination, for glioma grading. Material and Methods Fifty-two patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas who underwent DCE-MRI and SWI were enrolled in this retrospective study. Conventional MRIs were evaluated by the VASARI scoring system. TA of DCE-MRI-derived parameters and the degree of ITSS were compared between low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The diagnostic ability of each parameter and their combination for glioma grading were analyzed. Results Significant statistical differences in VASARI features were observed between LGGs and HGGs (P < 0.05), of which the enhancement quality had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.873) with 93.3% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The TA of DCE-MRI derived parameters were significantly different between LGGs and HGGs (P < 0.05), of which the uniformity of K-trans had the highest AUC (0.917) with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The degree of ITSS was significantly different between LGGs and HGGs (P < 0.001). The AUC of the ITSS was 0.925 with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The best discriminative power was obtained from a combination of enhancement quality, K-trans- uniformity, and ITSS, resulting in 96.7% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and AUC of 0.993. Conclusion Combining conventional MRI, TA of DCE-MRI, and ITSS on SWI may help to improve the differentiation between LGGs and HGGs.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 787
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Glioma grading by microvascular permeability parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intratumoral susceptibility signal on susceptibility weighted imaging
    Xiaoguang Li
    Yongshan Zhu
    Houyi Kang
    Yulong Zhang
    Huaping Liang
    Sumei Wang
    Weiguo Zhang
    Cancer Imaging, 15
  • [2] Glioma grading by microvascular permeability parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intratumoral susceptibility signal on susceptibility weighted imaging
    Li, Xiaoguang
    Zhu, Yongshan
    Kang, Houyi
    Zhang, Yulong
    Liang, Huaping
    Wang, Sumei
    Zhang, Weiguo
    CANCER IMAGING, 2015, 15
  • [3] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Grading of Gliomas
    Arevalo-Perez, Julio
    Peck, Kyung K.
    Young, Robert J.
    Holodny, Andrei I.
    Karimi, Sasan
    Lyo, John K.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2015, 25 (05) : 792 - 798
  • [4] Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Contrast-enhanced (DSC) Perfusion MRI in Neurooncological Imaging
    Mangla, R.
    Srinath, G.
    Kathuria, S.
    Ekholm, S.
    Westesson, P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [5] Discriminant analysis to classify glioma grading using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and immunohistochemical markers
    Awasthi, Rishi
    Rathore, Ram K. S.
    Soni, Priyanka
    Sahoo, Prativa
    Awasthi, Ashish
    Husain, Nuzhat
    Behari, Sanjay
    Singh, Rohit K.
    Pandey, Chandra M.
    Gupta, Rakesh K.
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 54 (03) : 205 - 213
  • [6] Discriminant analysis to classify glioma grading using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and immunohistochemical markers
    Rishi Awasthi
    Ram K. S. Rathore
    Priyanka Soni
    Prativa Sahoo
    Ashish Awasthi
    Nuzhat Husain
    Sanjay Behari
    Rohit K. Singh
    Chandra M. Pandey
    Rakesh K. Gupta
    Neuroradiology, 2012, 54 : 205 - 213
  • [7] Combined evaluation of conventional MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion weighted imaging for response evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma
    Dutoit, Julie C.
    Claus, Eveline
    Offner, Fritz
    Noens, Lucien
    Delanghe, Joris
    Verstraete, Koenraad L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (02) : 373 - 382
  • [8] Integrating diffusion kurtosis imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI, and short echo time chemical shift imaging for grading gliomas
    Van Cauter, Sofie
    De Keyzer, Frederik
    Sima, Diana M.
    Sava, Anca Croitor
    D'Arco, Felice
    Veraart, Jelle
    Peeters, Ronald R.
    Leemans, Alexander
    Van Gool, Stefaan
    Wilms, Guido
    Demaerel, Philippe
    Van Huffel, Sabine
    Sunaert, Stefan
    Himmelreich, Uwe
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (07) : 1010 - 1021
  • [9] Combination value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI in astrocytoma grading and correlation with GFAP, Topoisomerase IIα and MGMT
    Qin, Jiang-Bo
    Zhang, Hui
    Wang, Xiao-Chun
    Tan, Yan
    Wu, Xiao-Feng
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 18 (03) : 2763 - 2770
  • [10] Prospective glioma grading using single-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI
    Jain, K. K.
    Sahoo, P.
    Tyagi, R.
    Mehta, A.
    Patir, R.
    Vaishya, S.
    Prakash, N.
    Vasudev, N.
    Gupta, R. K.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (10) : 1128 - 1135