Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments

被引:92
|
作者
Svider, Peter F. [1 ]
Agarwal, Nitin [2 ]
Choudhry, Osamah J. [2 ]
Hajart, Aaron F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baredes, Soly [1 ,4 ]
Liu, James K. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Eloy, Jean Anderson [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol & Neurosci, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[4] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
关键词
HEALTH LITERACY; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.001
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the readability of online patient education materials among academic otolaryngology departments in the mid-Atlantic region, with the purpose of determining whether these commonly used online resources were written at a level readily understood by the average American. Methods: A readability analysis of online patient education materials was performed using several commonly used readability assessments including the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the FleschKincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, the New Dale-Chall Test, the Coleman-Liau Index, the New Fog Count, the Raygor Readability Estimate, the FORCAST test, and the Fry Graph. Results: Most patient education materials from these programs were written at or above an 11th grade reading level, considerably above National Institutes of Health guidelines for recommended difficulty. Conclusions: Patient educational materials from academic otolaryngology Web sites are written at too difficult a reading level for a significant portion of patients and can be simplified. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why publish in the Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery?
    Levine, Paul A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2006, 132 (08) : 837 - 837
  • [42] Sleeping beauties in the otolaryngology-head & neck surgery literature
    Coelho, Daniel H.
    Kirk, Andrew
    Miller, Derrick
    Hasan, Kaazim
    Fenton, John E.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (03): : 609 - 614
  • [43] Career development resource for otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
    Donnellan, Kimberly A.
    Pitman, Karen T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 206 (05): : 724 - 726
  • [44] Patient Safety and Quality Improvement in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Gettelfinger, John D.
    Paulk, P. Barrett
    Schmalbach, Cecelia E.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (01): : 33 - 40
  • [45] Artificial Intelligence Governance and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
    Nwosu, Obinna I.
    Crowson, Matthew G.
    Rameau, Anais
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2023, 133 (11): : 2868 - 2870
  • [46] The Patient Perspective-A Valuable But Untapped Resource in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
    Chang, Steven S.
    [J]. JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 146 (05) : 497 - +
  • [47] Appearance and morality: Ethics and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
    Sulmasy, DP
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2002, 126 (01) : 4 - 7
  • [48] Rules for Successful Leadership in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
    Oghalai, John S.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2022, 132 (08): : 1503 - 1504
  • [49] Duplicate publication in the field of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
    Bailey, BJ
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2002, 126 (03) : 211 - 216
  • [50] Perception of Shame in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Training
    McMains, Kevin Christopher
    Peel, Jennifer
    Weitzel, Erik K.
    Der-Torossian, Hirak
    Couch, Marion
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 153 (05) : 786 - 790