Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments

被引:92
|
作者
Svider, Peter F. [1 ]
Agarwal, Nitin [2 ]
Choudhry, Osamah J. [2 ]
Hajart, Aaron F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baredes, Soly [1 ,4 ]
Liu, James K. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Eloy, Jean Anderson [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol & Neurosci, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[4] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
关键词
HEALTH LITERACY; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.001
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the readability of online patient education materials among academic otolaryngology departments in the mid-Atlantic region, with the purpose of determining whether these commonly used online resources were written at a level readily understood by the average American. Methods: A readability analysis of online patient education materials was performed using several commonly used readability assessments including the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the FleschKincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, the New Dale-Chall Test, the Coleman-Liau Index, the New Fog Count, the Raygor Readability Estimate, the FORCAST test, and the Fry Graph. Results: Most patient education materials from these programs were written at or above an 11th grade reading level, considerably above National Institutes of Health guidelines for recommended difficulty. Conclusions: Patient educational materials from academic otolaryngology Web sites are written at too difficult a reading level for a significant portion of patients and can be simplified. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Centennial celebration of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery in the United States: History of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
    Papel, ID
    Goldstein, JC
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1996, 114 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [22] The use of robotics in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
    Maan, Z. N.
    Gibbins, N.
    Khalil, Rami
    Ally, Z.
    D'Souza, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 50 - 50
  • [23] Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery in Undergraduate Medical Education: Advances and Innovations
    Fung, Kevin
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 : S1 - S14
  • [24] Readability assessment of online thyroid surgery patient education materials
    Patel, Chirag R.
    Cherla, Deepa V.
    Sanghvi, Saurin
    Baredes, Soly
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (10): : 1421 - 1425
  • [25] DNA microarrays in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
    Whipple, ME
    Kuo, WP
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2002, 127 (03) : 196 - 204
  • [26] A UNIFIED OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK-SURGERY
    SCHULLER, DE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1989, 115 (12) : 1422 - 1423
  • [27] Clinical Biomarkers in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
    Samarrai, Ruwaa
    Rahman, Khalil
    Parham, Kourosh
    [J]. ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2024, 103 (05) : NP301 - NP311
  • [28] Climate Change and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
    Haugen, Thorsen
    Prichardo, Priscilla
    Hellums, Ryan
    Lindemann, Logan
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 168 (05) : 1261 - 1263
  • [29] Treatment research in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
    Gates, GA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1999, 125 (12) : 1408 - 1409
  • [30] CHANGES IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK-SURGERY
    CONLEY, J
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1984, 97 (5-6) : 387 - 391