Trends in Timing of and Glycemia at Initiation of Second-line Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in US Adults

被引:1
|
作者
Raghavan, Sridharan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Warsavage, Theodore [1 ,4 ]
Liu, Wenhui G. [1 ]
Raffle, Katherine [1 ]
Josey, Kevin [1 ,5 ]
Saxon, David R. [1 ,6 ]
Phillips, Lawrence S. [7 ,8 ]
Caplan, Liron [1 ,9 ]
Reusch, Jane E. B. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Colorado Hlth Care Syst, Med Serv, US Dept Vet Affairs, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Div Biomed Informat & Personalized Med, Dept Med, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Colorado Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Consortium, Aurora, CO 80202 USA
[4] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Informat, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Harvard Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Div Endocrinol Metab & Diabet, Dept Med, Aurora, CO USA
[7] Atlanta Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Med Serv, Decatur, GA USA
[8] Emory Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[9] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Div Rheumatol, Dept Med, Aurora, CO USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HEMOGLOBIN A(1C) TARGETS; CLINICAL INERTIA; TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION; METFORMIN MONOTHERAPY; SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA; GUIDANCE STATEMENT; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; GOAL ATTAINMENT; GLUCOSE CONTROL; BLOOD-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.2337/dc21-2492
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE Therapeutic inertia threatens the potential long-term benefits of achieving early glycemic control after type 2 diabetes diagnosis. We evaluated temporal trends in second-line diabetes medication initiation among individuals initially treated with metformin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We included data from 199,042 adults with type 2 diabetes in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system initially treated with metformin monotherapy from 2005 to 2013. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards and linear regression to estimate associations of year of metformin monotherapy initiation with time to second-line diabetes treatment over 5 years of follow-up (primary outcome) and with hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) at the time of second-line diabetes treatment initiation (secondary outcome). RESULTS The cumulative 5-year incidence of second-line medication initiation declined from 47% among metformin initiators in 2005 to 36% in 2013 counterparts (P < 0.0001) despite a gradual increase in mean HbA1c at the end of follow-up (from 6.94 +/- 1.28% to 7.09 +/- 1.42%, P-trend < 0.0001). In comparisons with metformin monotherapy initiators in 2005, adjusted hazard ratios for 5-year initiation of second-line diabetes treatment ranged from 0.90 (95% CI 0.87, 0.92) for 2006 metformin initiators to 0.68 (0.66, 0.70) for 2013 counterparts. Among those receiving second-line treatment within 5 years of metformin initiation, HbA1c at second-line medication initiation increased from 7.74 +/- 1.66% in 2005 metformin initiators to 8.55 +/- 1.92% in 2013 counterparts (P-trend < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS We observed progressive delays in diabetes treatment intensification consistent with therapeutic inertia. Process-of-care interventions early in the diabetes disease course may be needed to reverse adverse temporal trends in diabetes care.
引用
收藏
页码:1335 / 1345
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR SECOND-LINE MEDICATIONS TO MANAGE TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
    Ozdemir, Semra
    Baid, Drishti
    Verghese, Naina
    Lam, Amanda Yun Rui
    Lee, Phong Ching
    Ying, Lim Adoree Yi
    Zhu, Ling
    Finkelstein, Eric A.
    Goh, Su-Yen
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E286 - E287
  • [32] Changes in Treatment Satisfaction Over 3 Years in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Initiating Second-line Treatment
    Mita, Tomoya
    Katakami, Naoto
    Takahara, Mitsuyoshi
    Kawashima, Masaru
    Wada, Fumitaka
    Akiyama, Hiroki
    Morita, Naru
    Kidani, Yoko
    Yajima, Toshitaka
    Shimomura, Iichiro
    Watada, Hirotaka
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2022, 107 (09): : 2424 - 2432
  • [33] Trends and Factors Associated With Very High Glycemia and Noninitiation of Insulin Therapy in US Adults With Type 2 Diabetes, 1999-2018
    Ngueta, Gerard
    Nouthe, Brice
    Kengne, Andre Pascal
    DIABETES CARE, 2021, 44 (12) : E209 - E211
  • [34] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ORAL SEMAGLUTIDE AS THE SECOND-LINE AND THIRD-LINE TREATMENT FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENT
    Tan, E. C. H.
    Yang, M. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S52 - S53
  • [35] Recent trends in first-line glucose-lowering treatment choice for type 2 diabetes in younger and older adults in the US
    Shin, Hojin
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    Glynn, Robert
    Patorno, Elisabetta
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 254 - 254
  • [36] Cost-Effectiveness of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
    Jiejin Zhu
    Ying Zhou
    Qingyu Li
    Gang Wang
    Advances in Therapy, 2023, 40 : 4216 - 4235
  • [37] Cost-Effectiveness of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
    Zhu, Jiejin
    Zhou, Ying
    Li, Qingyu
    Wang, Gang
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2023, 40 (10) : 4216 - 4235
  • [38] Costs for Commercially Insured Adults Prescribed Second-line Diabetes Medications
    Liss, David T.
    Kang, Raymond H.
    Lancki, Nicola
    O'Brien, Matthew J.
    Wallia, Amisha
    Cooper, Andrew J.
    Harris, Sterling A.
    Parker, Emily D.
    Ackermann, Ronald T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2021, 27 (03): : E72 - +
  • [39] Insulin vs Sulfonylureas for Second-Line Diabetes Treatment Reply
    Roumie, Christianne L.
    Greevy, Robert A.
    Griffin, Marie R.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (16): : 1693 - 1694
  • [40] Trends in glycemic control and treatment from 1988 to 2002 among US adults with type 2 diabetes
    Suh, Dong-Churl
    Plauschinat, Craig A.
    Choi, Insun S.
    DIABETES, 2006, 55 : A228 - A228