Cost-Effectiveness of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

被引:7
|
作者
Zhu, Jiejin [1 ]
Zhou, Ying [1 ]
Li, Qingyu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Clin Pharm, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hangzhou Canc Hosp, Dept Pharm, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310002, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor; Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; Second-line treatment; Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor; Type; 2; diabetes; DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE-4 INHIBITORS; ADD-ON; UTILITY ANALYSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; METFORMIN; SULFONYLUREA; MELLITUS; SAXAGLIPTIN; LIRAGLUTIDE;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-023-02612-z
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
IntroductionEvidence from cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) for newer antidiabetic drugs is increasingly influencing revised recommendations for second-line therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This systematic review aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of newer antidiabetic drugs specified as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) for T2D in a second-line setting.MethodsA systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines, and all relevant published studies were searched comprehensively in electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and International Health Technology Assessment database published from April 2023. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 reporting checklists.ResultsWe included 28 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Overall reporting of the identified studies largely met CHEERS 2022 recommendations. The CORE and Cardiff models were the most frequently utilized for pharmacoeconomic evaluation in T2D. Four studies consistently discovered that SGLT2i was more cost-effective than GLP-1RA in T2D who were not adequately controlled by metformin monotherapy. Four studies compared GLP-1RA with DPP-4i, sufonylurea (SU), or insulin. Except for one that demonstrated SU was cost-effective, all were GLP-1RA. Five studies revealed that SGLT2i was more cost-effective than DPP-4i or SU. Eleven studies indicated that DPP-4i was more cost-effective than traditional antidiabetic drugs. Four additional studies explored the cost-effectiveness of various antidiabetic drugs as second-line options, indicating that SU, SGLT2i, or meglitinides were more economically advantageous. The most common driven factors were the cost of new antidiabetic drugs.ConclusionNewer antidiabetic drugs as second line are the cost-effective option for T2D from the cost-effectiveness perspective, especially SGLT2i.
引用
收藏
页码:4216 / 4235
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-Effectiveness of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
    Jiejin Zhu
    Ying Zhou
    Qingyu Li
    Gang Wang
    [J]. Advances in Therapy, 2023, 40 : 4216 - 4235
  • [2] Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of sulfonylureas and newer diabetes drugs as second-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes
    Franchi, Matteo
    Pellegrini, Giacomo
    Avogaro, Angelo
    Buzzetti, Giuliano
    Candido, Riccardo
    Cavaliere, Arturo
    Consoli, Agostino
    Marzona, Irene
    Mennini, Francesco Saverio
    Palcic, Stefano
    Corrao, Giovanni
    [J]. BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2024, 12 (03)
  • [3] Adherence to newer second-line oral antidiabetic drugs among people with type 2 diabetes-A systematic review
    Holdt-Caspersen, Nynne Sophie
    Dethlefsen, Claus
    Vestergaard, Peter
    Hejlesen, Ole
    Hangaard, Stine
    Jensen, Morten Hasselstrom
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH & PERSPECTIVES, 2024, 12 (02):
  • [4] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ORAL SEMAGLUTIDE AS THE SECOND-LINE AND THIRD-LINE TREATMENT FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENT
    Tan, E. C. H.
    Yang, M. C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S52 - S53
  • [5] Review: Newer second-line drugs for diabetes are not more cost-effective than sulfonylureas
    Genere, Natalia
    Montori, Victor M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 168 (02) : JC8 - JC8
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of second-line empagliflozin versus liraglutide for type 2 diabetes in the United States
    Reifsnider, Odette S.
    Pimple, Pratik
    Brand, Sarah
    Washington, Evelien Bergrath
    Shetty, Sharash
    Desai, Nihar R.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2022, 24 (04): : 652 - 661
  • [7] Cost-Effectiveness of Saxagliptin versus Acarbose as Second-Line Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes in China
    Gu, Shuyan
    Zeng, Yuhang
    Yu, Demin
    Hu, Xiaoqian
    Dong, Hengjin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Newer Non-Insulin Antidiabetic Drugs: Trends in Decision-Analytical Models for Modelling of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Henrik Vitus Bering Laursen
    Emmelie Ploug Jørgensen
    Peter Vestergaard
    Lars Holger Ehlers
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2023, 41 : 1469 - 1514
  • [9] A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Newer Non-Insulin Antidiabetic Drugs: Trends in Decision-Analytical Models for Modelling of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Laursen, Henrik Vitus Bering
    Jorgensen, Emmelie Ploug
    Vestergaard, Peter
    Ehlers, Lars Holger
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2023, 41 (11) : 1469 - 1514
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin as a Second-Line Therapy in Treatment Sequences of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in The United States
    Reifsnider, Odette
    Kansal, Anuraag
    Pimple, Pratik
    Aponte-Ribero, Valerie
    Brand, Sarah
    Shetty, Sharash
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2019, 140