Cost-Effectiveness of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

被引:7
|
作者
Zhu, Jiejin [1 ]
Zhou, Ying [1 ]
Li, Qingyu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Clin Pharm, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hangzhou Canc Hosp, Dept Pharm, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310002, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor; Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; Second-line treatment; Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor; Type; 2; diabetes; DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE-4 INHIBITORS; ADD-ON; UTILITY ANALYSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; METFORMIN; SULFONYLUREA; MELLITUS; SAXAGLIPTIN; LIRAGLUTIDE;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-023-02612-z
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
IntroductionEvidence from cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) for newer antidiabetic drugs is increasingly influencing revised recommendations for second-line therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This systematic review aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of newer antidiabetic drugs specified as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) for T2D in a second-line setting.MethodsA systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines, and all relevant published studies were searched comprehensively in electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and International Health Technology Assessment database published from April 2023. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 reporting checklists.ResultsWe included 28 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Overall reporting of the identified studies largely met CHEERS 2022 recommendations. The CORE and Cardiff models were the most frequently utilized for pharmacoeconomic evaluation in T2D. Four studies consistently discovered that SGLT2i was more cost-effective than GLP-1RA in T2D who were not adequately controlled by metformin monotherapy. Four studies compared GLP-1RA with DPP-4i, sufonylurea (SU), or insulin. Except for one that demonstrated SU was cost-effective, all were GLP-1RA. Five studies revealed that SGLT2i was more cost-effective than DPP-4i or SU. Eleven studies indicated that DPP-4i was more cost-effective than traditional antidiabetic drugs. Four additional studies explored the cost-effectiveness of various antidiabetic drugs as second-line options, indicating that SU, SGLT2i, or meglitinides were more economically advantageous. The most common driven factors were the cost of new antidiabetic drugs.ConclusionNewer antidiabetic drugs as second line are the cost-effective option for T2D from the cost-effectiveness perspective, especially SGLT2i.
引用
收藏
页码:4216 / 4235
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Type 2 diabetes: second-line antidiabetic therapy in early pregnancy
    Clauss, Maria
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2024, 228 (02): : 119 - 119
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness analysis of second-line pharmacological treatment of acromegaly in Spain
    Peral, Carmen
    Cordido, Fernando
    Gimeno-Ballester, Vicente
    Mir, Nuria
    Sanchez-Cenizo, Laura
    Rubio-Rodriguez, Dario
    Rubio-Terres, Carlos
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01) : 105 - 114
  • [23] Cost-Effectiveness of Cabozantinib in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Enrique
    Aguiar, Pedro N., Jr.
    Cordon, Monica L.
    Chavarri-Guerra, Yanin
    Lopes, Gilberto de Lima, Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2019, 17 (06): : 669 - 675
  • [24] Comparison of Glucose-Lowering Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gu, Shuyan
    Hu, Xiaoqian
    Zhen, Xuemei
    Shi, Lizheng
    Shao, Hui
    Sun, Xueshan
    Gu, Yuxuan
    Huang, Minzhuo
    Dong, Hengjin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (18)
  • [25] Outcomes of second-line oral antidiabetic drugs in persons with young-onset type 2 diabetes
    Yen, Fu-Shun
    Wei, James Cheng-Chung
    Liu, Jia-Sin
    Hsu, Chih-Cheng
    Hwu, Chii-Min
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 177
  • [26] Cost-Effectiveness of Saxagliptin Compared With Glibenclamide as a Second-Line Therapy Added to Metformin for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Ethiopia
    Bekele, Mengistu
    Norheim, Ole Frithjof
    Hailu, Alemayehu
    [J]. MDM POLICY & PRACTICE, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [27] PATIENTS' PREFERENCES FOR NEWER SECOND-LINE PHARMACOLOGICAL AGENTS IN TYPE 2 DIABETES
    Banjara, B.
    Poudel, N.
    Garza, K. B.
    Westrick, S. C.
    Whitley, H. P.
    Ngorsuraches, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S566 - S566
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness of treatment of type 2 diabetes
    Eastman, RC
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (03) : 464 - 465
  • [29] Meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness of second-line antiepileptic drugs for status epilepticus
    Sanchez Fernandez, Ivann
    Gainza-Lein, Marina
    Lamb, Nathan
    Loddenkemper, Tobias
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (20) : E2339 - E2348
  • [30] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT PATHWAYS FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES DRUGS
    Kwon, C. S.
    Seoane-Vazquez, E.
    Rodriguez-Monguio, R.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A202 - A202