Cost-Effectiveness of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

被引:7
|
作者
Zhu, Jiejin [1 ]
Zhou, Ying [1 ]
Li, Qingyu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Clin Pharm, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hangzhou Canc Hosp, Dept Pharm, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310002, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor; Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; Second-line treatment; Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor; Type; 2; diabetes; DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE-4 INHIBITORS; ADD-ON; UTILITY ANALYSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; METFORMIN; SULFONYLUREA; MELLITUS; SAXAGLIPTIN; LIRAGLUTIDE;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-023-02612-z
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
IntroductionEvidence from cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) for newer antidiabetic drugs is increasingly influencing revised recommendations for second-line therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This systematic review aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of newer antidiabetic drugs specified as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) for T2D in a second-line setting.MethodsA systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines, and all relevant published studies were searched comprehensively in electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and International Health Technology Assessment database published from April 2023. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 reporting checklists.ResultsWe included 28 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Overall reporting of the identified studies largely met CHEERS 2022 recommendations. The CORE and Cardiff models were the most frequently utilized for pharmacoeconomic evaluation in T2D. Four studies consistently discovered that SGLT2i was more cost-effective than GLP-1RA in T2D who were not adequately controlled by metformin monotherapy. Four studies compared GLP-1RA with DPP-4i, sufonylurea (SU), or insulin. Except for one that demonstrated SU was cost-effective, all were GLP-1RA. Five studies revealed that SGLT2i was more cost-effective than DPP-4i or SU. Eleven studies indicated that DPP-4i was more cost-effective than traditional antidiabetic drugs. Four additional studies explored the cost-effectiveness of various antidiabetic drugs as second-line options, indicating that SU, SGLT2i, or meglitinides were more economically advantageous. The most common driven factors were the cost of new antidiabetic drugs.ConclusionNewer antidiabetic drugs as second line are the cost-effective option for T2D from the cost-effectiveness perspective, especially SGLT2i.
引用
收藏
页码:4216 / 4235
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chiang, Chi-leung
    Chan, Sik-kwan
    Lee, Shing-fung
    Wong, Irene Oi-ling
    Choi, Horace Cheuk-wai
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [42] Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in second-line advanced bladder cancer
    Sarfaty, Michal
    Hall, Peter
    Chan, Kelvin K.
    Virik, Kiran
    Leshno, Moshe
    Gordon, Noa
    Moore, Assaf
    Neiman, Victoria
    Rosenbaum, Eli
    Goldstein, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06)
  • [43] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDIES OF NEWER NON- INSULIN ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS (NNIADS): TRENDS IN DECISION-ANALYTICAL MODELS (DAM) FOR MODELLING OF TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS (T2DM)
    Laursen, H.
    Jorgensen, E. P.
    Vestergaard, P.
    Ehlers, L. H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S92 - S92
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Second-line Advanced Bladder Cancer
    Sarfaty, Michal
    Hall, Peter S.
    Chan, Kelvin K. W.
    Virik, Kiran
    Leshno, Moshe
    Gordon, Noa
    Moore, Assaf
    Neiman, Victoria
    Rosenbaum, Eli
    Goldstein, Daniel A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [45] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF FULVESTRANT IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BREAST CANCER IN SECOND-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY
    Krysanov, I
    Krysanova, V
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A637 - A637
  • [46] A COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDY OF SECOND-LINE TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC OVERACTIVE BLADDER IN SPAIN
    Arlandis, S.
    Castro, D.
    Errando, C.
    Fernandez, E.
    Jimenez, M.
    Gonzalez, P.
    Crespo, C.
    Stauble, F.
    Rodriguez, J. M.
    [J]. GACETA SANITARIA, 2009, 23 : 200 - 201
  • [47] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SUNITINIB AS SECOND-LINE TREATMENT FOR GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR(GIST) IN CHINA
    Ren, H.
    Zhang, J.
    Dong, P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A455 - A455
  • [48] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PEMBROLIZUMAB AS SECOND-LINE TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED UROTHELIAL CANCER IN FRANCE
    Robert, J.
    Culine, S.
    Roupret, M.
    Zhong, Y.
    Prabhu, V. S.
    Xu, R.
    Li, H.
    Lafuma, A.
    Bensimon, L.
    Clement, A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S44 - S44
  • [49] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF REGORAFENIB AS A SECOND-LINE THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA IN CHINA
    Xiao, D.
    Zhu, S.
    Sun, W.
    Xuan, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S187 - S188
  • [50] A budget-impact and cost-effectiveness model for second-line treatment of major depression
    Malone, Daniel C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2007, 13 (06): : S8 - S18