Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids increase insulin sensitivity in growing steers

被引:0
|
作者
Cartiff, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Fellner, V. [1 ,2 ]
Eisemann, J. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Interdept Nutr Program, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; insulin sensitivity; n-3 fatty acids; steers; BOVINE SKELETAL-MUSCLE; HOLSTEIN COWS; FATTY-ACIDS; GLUCOSE-METABOLISM; ABOMASAL INFUSION; MINIATURE PIGS; DAIRY-COWS; WHOLE-BODY; OIL; RESPONSIVENESS;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2012-5694
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of dietary n-3 long chain PUFA on insulin sensitivity in growing steers. Steers (n = 12, initial BW = 336.3 kg, SEM = 7.7) were adapted to a basal diet that was 70% concentrate mix and 30% orchardgrass hay. Steers were fed a daily amount of 0.26 Mcal ME per kg BW0.75. After 3 wk steers were transitioned to 1 of 2 treatment (Trt) diets (n = 6 per diet) containing added Ca salts of fatty acids at 4% of DM using a source of fat that was enriched in n-3 fatty acids, including eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid (FOFA), or a source of fat without n-3 fatty acids and a greater percentage of C16: 0 and C18: 1 (LCFA). Three intravenous (i.v.) glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT) were conducted, 1 during the basal diet, and 2 after transition to treatment diets at time 1 (T1; d 4 Trt) and time 2 (T2; d 39 Trt). Three i.v. insulin challenge tests (IC) were conducted the day after each IVGTT. Measurements on the basal diet were used as covariates. For IVGTT, there was a diet by time interaction (P < 0.05) for glucose area under the response curve (AUC). The AUC(50) (mM glucose x 50 min) at T1 was less (P = 0.02) for LCFA (126.2) than FOFA (151.8), AUC(50) at T2 tended to be greater (P = 0.07) for LCFA (165.9) than FOFA (146.0). Preinfusion insulin concentration was greater (P < 0.001) before the IVGTT and IC for steers fed LCFA (40.4 and 40.2 mu IU/mL) than for steers fed FOFA (23.7 and 27.1 mu IU/mL), respectively. Glucose clearance did not differ between treatments. For IC, minimum glucose concentration was greater (P = 0.02) and glucose AUC(150) was less (P < 0.01) for steers fed LCFA than for steers fed FOFA. Values for glucose concentration were 1.8 mM and 1.5 mM and for AUC(150) (mM glucose x 150 min) were 203.1 and 263.6 for steers fed LCFA and FOFA, respectively. Insulin clearance (fraction/min) was greater (P < 0.01) for steers fed LCFA (0.121) than FOFA (0.101). The insulin AUC(60) (mu IU/mL x 60 min) postinfusion was less for LCFA (17,674) than FOFA (19,997), and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) at T1 (19,552) than T2 (18,119). Plasma NEFA concentrations at T2 during IVGTT were greater (P < 0.05) in steers fed FOFA than in steers fed LCFA. The results indicated that supplementing with long-chain n-3 PUFA (FOFA) increased insulin sensitivity in growing steers compared with feeding a supplement with greater concentration of SFA (LCFA).
引用
收藏
页码:2332 / 2342
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFECTS OF DIETS ENRICHED IN EICOSAPENTAENOIC OR DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACIDS ON PROSTANOID METABOLISM IN THE RAT
    CROFT, KD
    BEILIN, LJ
    LEGGE, FM
    VANDONGEN, R
    LIPIDS, 1987, 22 (09) : 647 - 650
  • [42] LIPOXYGENASE IN TROUT GILL TISSUE ACTING ON ARACHIDONIC, EICOSAPENTAENOIC AND DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACIDS
    GERMAN, JB
    BRUCKNER, GG
    KINSELLA, JE
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1986, 875 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [43] Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids production by and okara-utilizing potential of thraustochytrids
    Fan, KW
    Chen, F
    Jones, EBG
    Vrijmoed, LLP
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 27 (04) : 199 - 202
  • [44] Disappearance of docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids from cultures of mixed ruminal microorganisms
    AbuGhazaleh, AA
    Jenkins, TC
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2004, 87 (03) : 645 - 651
  • [45] Oxidation of plasma proteins is not increased after supplementation with eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids
    Wander, RC
    Du, SL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2000, 72 (03): : 731 - 737
  • [46] Fatty Acids and Their Derivatives in Cardiovascular Disease: Arachidonic, Eicosapentaenoic, and Docosahexaenoic Acids and Their Byproducts, the Eicosanoids and Docosanoids
    Baum, Seth J.
    Hamm, Aidan
    CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR RISK REPORTS, 2012, 6 (02)
  • [47] Fatty Acids and Their Derivatives in Cardiovascular Disease: Arachidonic, Eicosapentaenoic, and Docosahexaenoic Acids and Their Byproducts, the Eicosanoids and Docosanoids
    Seth J. Baum
    Aidan Hamm
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2012, 6 (2) : 146 - 154
  • [48] Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Acids Differentially Alter Gut Microbiome and Reverse High-Fat Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance
    Zhuang, Pan
    Zhang, Yu
    Shou, Qiyang
    Li, Haoyu
    Zhu, Ya'er
    He, Lilin
    Chen, Jingnan
    Jiao, Jingjing
    MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH, 2020, 64 (10)
  • [49] Dietary eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid are more effective than alpha-linolenic acid in improving insulin sensitivity in rats
    Andersen, Gaby
    Harnack, Kerstin
    Erbersdobler, Helmut F.
    Somoza, Veronika
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2008, 52 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [50] Docosahexaenoic and Eicosapentaenoic Acids Promote the Accumulation of Browning-Related Myokines via Calcium Signaling in Insulin-Resistant Mice
    Wei, Wenting
    Yu, Siyan
    Zeng, Huanting
    Tan, Weifeng
    Hu, Manjiang
    Huang, Jie
    Li, Xudong
    Mao, Limei
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2024, 154 (04): : 1271 - 1281