Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids increase insulin sensitivity in growing steers

被引:0
|
作者
Cartiff, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Fellner, V. [1 ,2 ]
Eisemann, J. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Interdept Nutr Program, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; insulin sensitivity; n-3 fatty acids; steers; BOVINE SKELETAL-MUSCLE; HOLSTEIN COWS; FATTY-ACIDS; GLUCOSE-METABOLISM; ABOMASAL INFUSION; MINIATURE PIGS; DAIRY-COWS; WHOLE-BODY; OIL; RESPONSIVENESS;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2012-5694
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of dietary n-3 long chain PUFA on insulin sensitivity in growing steers. Steers (n = 12, initial BW = 336.3 kg, SEM = 7.7) were adapted to a basal diet that was 70% concentrate mix and 30% orchardgrass hay. Steers were fed a daily amount of 0.26 Mcal ME per kg BW0.75. After 3 wk steers were transitioned to 1 of 2 treatment (Trt) diets (n = 6 per diet) containing added Ca salts of fatty acids at 4% of DM using a source of fat that was enriched in n-3 fatty acids, including eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid (FOFA), or a source of fat without n-3 fatty acids and a greater percentage of C16: 0 and C18: 1 (LCFA). Three intravenous (i.v.) glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT) were conducted, 1 during the basal diet, and 2 after transition to treatment diets at time 1 (T1; d 4 Trt) and time 2 (T2; d 39 Trt). Three i.v. insulin challenge tests (IC) were conducted the day after each IVGTT. Measurements on the basal diet were used as covariates. For IVGTT, there was a diet by time interaction (P < 0.05) for glucose area under the response curve (AUC). The AUC(50) (mM glucose x 50 min) at T1 was less (P = 0.02) for LCFA (126.2) than FOFA (151.8), AUC(50) at T2 tended to be greater (P = 0.07) for LCFA (165.9) than FOFA (146.0). Preinfusion insulin concentration was greater (P < 0.001) before the IVGTT and IC for steers fed LCFA (40.4 and 40.2 mu IU/mL) than for steers fed FOFA (23.7 and 27.1 mu IU/mL), respectively. Glucose clearance did not differ between treatments. For IC, minimum glucose concentration was greater (P = 0.02) and glucose AUC(150) was less (P < 0.01) for steers fed LCFA than for steers fed FOFA. Values for glucose concentration were 1.8 mM and 1.5 mM and for AUC(150) (mM glucose x 150 min) were 203.1 and 263.6 for steers fed LCFA and FOFA, respectively. Insulin clearance (fraction/min) was greater (P < 0.01) for steers fed LCFA (0.121) than FOFA (0.101). The insulin AUC(60) (mu IU/mL x 60 min) postinfusion was less for LCFA (17,674) than FOFA (19,997), and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) at T1 (19,552) than T2 (18,119). Plasma NEFA concentrations at T2 during IVGTT were greater (P < 0.05) in steers fed FOFA than in steers fed LCFA. The results indicated that supplementing with long-chain n-3 PUFA (FOFA) increased insulin sensitivity in growing steers compared with feeding a supplement with greater concentration of SFA (LCFA).
引用
收藏
页码:2332 / 2342
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Significance of antioxidative functions of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in marine microorganisms
    Okuyama, Hidetoshi
    Orikasa, Yoshitake
    Nishida, Takanori
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 74 (03) : 570 - 574
  • [22] Genes and pathways involved in biosynthesis of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in bacteria
    Ootaki, M
    Morita, N
    Nishida, T
    Tanaka, M
    Hase, A
    Yano, Y
    Yamada, A
    Yu, R
    Watanabe, K
    Okuyama, H
    ADVANCED RESEARCH ON PLANT LIPIDS, 2003, : 49 - 52
  • [23] Identification of docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids multiple targets facing periodontopathogens
    Sette-de-Souza, Pedro Henrique
    da Silva Bezerra, Wislayne Mirelly
    Gomes Dantas, Maria Karoline
    Santos Moura, Larissa Mylena
    Donato Duarte Filho, Eduardo Sergio
    Lopes, Daniela Siqueira
    MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS, 2021, 161
  • [24] Enzymatic Synthesis of Epoxidized Metabolites of Docosahexaenoic, Eicosapentaenoic, and Arachidonic Acids
    Woodman, Joseph W.
    Cinelli, Mans A.
    Scharmen-Burgdolf, Amy
    Lee, Kin Sing Stephen
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2019, (148):
  • [25] APPLICATION OF WATER MIMICS ON PREPARATION OF EICOSAPENTAENOIC AND DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACIDS CONTAINING GLYCEROLIPIDS
    HOSOKAWA, M
    TAKAHASHI, K
    MIYAZAKI, N
    OKAMURA, K
    HATANO, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1995, 72 (04) : 421 - 425
  • [26] Differential Anti-Adipogenic Effects of Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Acids in Obesity
    Zhuang, Pan
    Lu, Yanhua
    Shou, Qiyang
    Mao, Lei
    He, Lilin
    Wang, Jun
    Chen, Jingnan
    Zhang, Yu
    Jiao, Jingjing
    MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (14)
  • [27] Bacterial genes responsible for the biosynthesis of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids and their heterologous expression
    Okuyama, Hidetoshi
    Orikasa, Yoshitake
    Nishida, Takanorl
    Watanabe, Kazuo
    Morita, Naoki
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 73 (03) : 665 - 670
  • [28] INSULIN-RESPONSE TO FEEDING IN GROWING STEERS
    CHASE, LE
    WANGSNESS, PJ
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1975, 58 (05) : 776 - 776
  • [29] Effects of docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids on blood lipid profile in hypercholesterolemic children
    Pederiva, C.
    Riva, E.
    Ferrante, F.
    Saviano, C.
    Giovannini, M.
    Agostoni, C.
    Decarlis, S.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 : 13 - 13
  • [30] Docosahexaenoic and Eicosapentaenoic Acids Segregate Differently between Raft and Nonraft Domains
    Williams, Justin A.
    Batten, Shawn E.
    Harris, Mitchel
    Rockett, Benjamin Drew
    Shaikh, Saame Raza
    Stillwell, William
    Wassall, Stephen R.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 103 (02) : 228 - 237