A comprehensive framework for the activation, management, and evaluation of Co-production in the public sector

被引:2
|
作者
Cepiku, Denita [1 ]
Marsilio, Marta [2 ]
Sicilia, Mariafrancesca [3 ]
Vainieri, Milena [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Management & Law, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Econ Management & Quantitat Methods, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Bergamo, Dept Management, Bergamo, Italy
[4] Inst Management, Scuola Super Sant Anna Pisa, Pisa, Italy
关键词
Co; -production; Public service; Collaboration management; Evaluation; Performance; VALUE CO-CREATION; CUSTOMER PARTICIPATION; HEALTH-CARE; CITIZEN COPRODUCTION; SOCIAL-SERVICES; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; USER COPRODUCTION; ENGAGING CITIZENS; SELF-EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135056
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-production analyses the practices in which state or firms and lay actors work together in any phase of the production cycle. In the public sector, citizens are not seen as mere recipients of services but as co-producers at different stages. Scholarly interest in co-production has grown steadily in the past years. However, the research has yet to integrate the many co-production concepts into a distinctive theoretical comprehensive framework able to strengthen the understanding of the interrelated dynamics at play. The article conducts a systematic indepth qualitative review of the co-production literature for the public sector. The results highlight the main components into four pillars of a comprehensive theoretical framework to guide scholars and practitioners in the activation and management of co-production as well as in the evaluation of its outcomes. The article concludes by formulating a future research agenda for co-production in the public sector.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Analytical Framework for Value Co-Production in Services
    Karmarkar, Uday S.
    Roels, Guillaume
    SERVICE SCIENCE, 2015, 7 (03) : 163 - 180
  • [32] A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services
    Khine, Pwint Kay
    Mi, Jianing
    Shahid, Raza
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [33] Urban Public Art: Geographies of Co-Production
    Pardue, Derek
    Gibbings, Sheri
    CITY & SOCIETY, 2018, 30 (01) : 3 - 4
  • [34] Debate: Co-production of public services and outcomes
    Bovaird, Tony
    Flemig, Sophie
    Loeffler, Elke
    Osborne, Stephen P.
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 37 (05) : 363 - 364
  • [35] CO-PRODUCTION IN HEALTH: AN EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS
    Gupta, A.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 50 : 156 - 157
  • [36] Democratizing co-production of sustainable public services
    Lopez-De-Ipina, D.
    Brandsen, T.
    Steen, T.
    Misikangas, P.
    Sarasa, D.
    Mueller, A. P. Rodriguez
    Edelmann, N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2022: Intelligent Technologies, Governments and Citizens, 2022, : 497 - 499
  • [37] Digital management in the public sector - a framework
    Bygstad, Bendik
    Iden, Jon
    ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT- AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 20 (04) : 442 - 458
  • [38] Individual, Group, and Collective Co-production: The Role of Public Value Conceptions in Shaping Co-production Practices
    McMullin, Caitlin
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2023, 55 (02) : 239 - 263
  • [39] Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations
    Edelmann, Noella
    Mergel, Ines
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [40] The Wisdom of the Crowds and the Public Sphere: the co-production of solutions to public problems through ideas management platforms
    Monteiro Martins, Teresa Cristina
    Zambalde, Andre Luiz
    ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA E GESTAO SOCIAL, 2020, 12 (03):