Effects of species' ecology on the accuracy of distribution models

被引:263
|
作者
McPherson, Jana M.
Jetz, Walter
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Biol Sci, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04823.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In the face of accelerating biodiversity loss and limited data, species distribution models - which statistically capture and predict species' occurrences based on environmental correlates - are increasingly used to inform conservation strategies. Additionally, distribution models and their fit provide insights on the broad-scale environmental niche of species. To investigate whether the performance of such models varies with species' ecological characteristics, we examined distribution models for 1329 bird species in southern and eastern Africa. The models were constructed at two spatial resolutions with both logistic and autologistic regression. Satellite-derived environmental indices served as predictors, and model accuracy was assessed with three metrics: sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics plots. We then determined the relationship between each measure of accuracy and ten ecological species characteristics using generalised linear models. Among the ecological traits tested, species' range size, migratory status, affinity for wetlands and endemism proved most influential on the performance of distribution models. The number of habitat types frequented (habitat tolerance), trophic rank, body mass, preferred habitat structure and association with sub-resolution habitats also showed some effect. In contrast, conservation status made no significant impact. These findings did not differ from one spatial resolution to the next. Our analyses thus provide conservation scientists and resource managers with a rule of thumb that helps distinguish, on the basis of ecological traits, between species whose occurrence is reliably or less reliably predicted by distribution models. Reasonably accurate distribution models should, however, be attainable for most species, because the influence ecological traits bore on model performance was only limited. These results suggest that none of the ecological traits tested provides an obvious correlate for environmental niche breadth or intra-specific niche differentiation.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 151
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF COASTAL SPECIES ON ROADSIDES
    SCOTT, NE
    DAVISON, AW
    [J]. VEGETATIO, 1985, 62 (1-3): : 433 - 440
  • [32] Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology
    Guisan, A
    Zimmermann, NE
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2000, 135 (2-3) : 147 - 186
  • [33] Effects of species and habitat positional errors on the performance and interpretation of species distribution models
    Osborne, Patrick E.
    Leitao, Pedro J.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2009, 15 (04) : 671 - 681
  • [34] Species distribution models reveal apparent competitive and facilitative effects of a dominant species on the distribution of tundra plants
    Pellissier, Loic
    Brathen, Kari Anne
    Pottier, Julien
    Randin, Christophe F.
    Vittoz, Pascal
    Dubuis, Anne
    Yoccoz, Nigel G.
    Alm, Torbjorn
    Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
    Guisan, Antoine
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2010, 33 (06) : 1004 - 1014
  • [35] Ecological and biological indicators of the accuracy of species distribution models: lessons from European bryophytes
    Collart, Flavien
    Broennimann, Olivier
    Guisan, Antoine
    Vanderpoorten, Alain
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2023, 2023 (08)
  • [36] Incorporation of latitude-adjusted bioclimatic variables increases accuracy in species distribution models
    Andersen, Desiree
    Litvinchuk, Spartak N.
    Jang, Hoan Jin
    Jiang, Jianping
    Koo, Kyo Soung
    Maslova, Irina
    Kim, Daemin
    Jang, Yikweon
    Borz, Amael
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2022, 469
  • [37] Finer spatial resolution improves accuracy of species distribution models in heterogeneous landscapes - A response
    Ramesh, Vijay
    Melnick, Don J.
    Gopalakrishna, Trisha
    Barve, Sahas
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 213 : 247 - 248
  • [38] Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS)
    Allouche, Omri
    Tsoar, Asaf
    Kadmon, Ronen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2006, 43 (06) : 1223 - 1232
  • [39] Effects of models and spatial resolutions on the species distribution model performance
    Farashi A.
    Alizadeh-Noughani M.
    [J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2018, 4 (1) : 263 - 268
  • [40] Effects of simulated observation errors on the performance of species distribution models
    Fernandes, Rui F.
    Scherrer, Daniel
    Guisan, Antoine
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2019, 25 (03) : 400 - 413