Effects of species' ecology on the accuracy of distribution models

被引:263
|
作者
McPherson, Jana M.
Jetz, Walter
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Biol Sci, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04823.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In the face of accelerating biodiversity loss and limited data, species distribution models - which statistically capture and predict species' occurrences based on environmental correlates - are increasingly used to inform conservation strategies. Additionally, distribution models and their fit provide insights on the broad-scale environmental niche of species. To investigate whether the performance of such models varies with species' ecological characteristics, we examined distribution models for 1329 bird species in southern and eastern Africa. The models were constructed at two spatial resolutions with both logistic and autologistic regression. Satellite-derived environmental indices served as predictors, and model accuracy was assessed with three metrics: sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics plots. We then determined the relationship between each measure of accuracy and ten ecological species characteristics using generalised linear models. Among the ecological traits tested, species' range size, migratory status, affinity for wetlands and endemism proved most influential on the performance of distribution models. The number of habitat types frequented (habitat tolerance), trophic rank, body mass, preferred habitat structure and association with sub-resolution habitats also showed some effect. In contrast, conservation status made no significant impact. These findings did not differ from one spatial resolution to the next. Our analyses thus provide conservation scientists and resource managers with a rule of thumb that helps distinguish, on the basis of ecological traits, between species whose occurrence is reliably or less reliably predicted by distribution models. Reasonably accurate distribution models should, however, be attainable for most species, because the influence ecological traits bore on model performance was only limited. These results suggest that none of the ecological traits tested provides an obvious correlate for environmental niche breadth or intra-specific niche differentiation.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 151
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Testing the accuracy of species distribution models using species records from a new field survey
    Newbold, Tim
    Reader, Tom
    El-Gabbas, Ahmed
    Berg, Wiebke
    Shohdi, Wael M.
    Zalat, Samy
    El Din, Sherif Baha
    Gilbert, Francis
    [J]. OIKOS, 2010, 119 (08) : 1326 - 1334
  • [22] Incorporating the effects of climate change on species interactions into species distribution models
    Lany, N. L.
    Zarnetske, P. L.
    Gouhier, T. C.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 57 : E320 - E320
  • [23] Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models
    Wisz, M. S.
    Hijmans, R. J.
    Li, J.
    Peterson, A. T.
    Graham, C. H.
    Guisan, A.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2008, 14 (05) : 763 - 773
  • [24] Incorporating effects of habitat patches into species distribution models
    Riva, Federico
    Martin, Caroline Jean
    Acedo, Carmen Galan
    Bellon, Erwan Nicolas
    Keil, Petr
    Moran-Ordonez, Alejandra
    Fahrig, Lenore
    Guisan, Antoine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2024,
  • [25] Incorporating reef fish avoidance behavior improves accuracy of species distribution models
    Stamoulis, Kostantinos A.
    Delevaux, Jade M. S.
    Williams, Ivor D.
    Friedlander, Alan M.
    Reichard, Jake
    Kamikawa, Keith
    Harvey, Euan S.
    [J]. PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [26] Measuring and comparing the accuracy of species distribution models with presence-absence data
    Liu, Canran
    White, Matt
    Newell, Graeme
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2011, 34 (02) : 232 - 243
  • [27] Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models
    Newbold, Tim
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 34 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [28] DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE FRULLANIA SPECIES OF SWITZERLAND
    BISANG, I
    [J]. BOTANICA HELVETICA, 1985, 95 (02): : 247 - 278
  • [29] Distribution and ecology of Armillaria species in Greece
    Tsopelas, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST PATHOLOGY, 1999, 29 (02) : 103 - 116
  • [30] Ecology and distribution of Armillaria species in Norway
    Keca, N.
    Solheim, H.
    [J]. FOREST PATHOLOGY, 2011, 41 (02) : 120 - 132