Comparison of Pneumatonometry and Transpalpebral Tonometry Measurements of Intraocular Pressure during Scleral Lens Wear

被引:13
|
作者
Fogt, Jennifer Swingle [1 ]
Nau, Cherie B. [2 ]
Schornack, Muriel [2 ]
Shorter, Ellen [3 ]
Nau, Amy [4 ]
Harthan, Jennifer S. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Optometry, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Korb & Associates, Boston, MA USA
[5] Illinois Coll Optometry, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; CONTACT-LENSES; TGDC-01;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0000000000001574
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
SIGNIFICANCE: As scleral lens wear becomes more common, understanding the impact of these lenses upon ocular physiology is critically important. Studies on the effect of scleral lens wear upon intraocular pressure (IOP) have used different instruments and have reported conflicting results. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare assessment of IOP during scleral lens wear using pneumatonometry and transpalpebral tonometry. METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects wore a small-diameter (15.2 mm) and a large-diameter (18.0 mm) scleral lens on the right eye, each for 1 hour in randomized order. IOP was assessed with pneumatonometry and transpalpebral tonometry on both eyes before lens application, immediately after lens application, after 1 hour of lens wear, and immediately after lens removal. Paired t test compared mean IOP in the study eye to the control eye. Repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to take instrumentation, lens diameter, and their interaction into account in an analysis of the change in IOP in the study eye. RESULTS: Mean peripheral IOP measured with pneumatonometry was not significantly different from baseline at any subsequentmeasurement. Measurements with transpalpebral tonometry, however, were significantly different during scleral lens wear immediately after application and after 1 hour of wear with both diameter lenses (P < .005), but were not significantly different after either sized lens was removed. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the instrument used to measure IOP was a significant factor in IOP changes found during lens wear (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of IOP during scleral lens wear varies based upon the instrument that is used. Although further studies are clearly needed to further elucidate this issue, clinicians should continue to monitor optic nerve structure and function in scleral lens wearers, as they do in all patients.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 719
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reinforced scleral fixation of foldable intraocular lens by double sutures: comparison with intrascleral intraocular lens fixation
    Chantarasorn, Yodpong
    Techalertsuwan, Settapong
    Siripanthong, Pongsavit
    Tamerug, Anurak
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 62 (03) : 365 - 372
  • [42] Effect of Repeated Applanation Tonometry on the Accuracy of Intraocular Pressure Measurements
    Ehrenberg, M.
    Gaton, D.
    Lusky, M.
    Dotan, G.
    Weinberger, D.
    Snir, M.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [43] Reinforced scleral fixation of foldable intraocular lens by double sutures: comparison with intrascleral intraocular lens fixation
    Yodpong Chantarasorn
    Settapong Techalertsuwan
    Pongsavit Siripanthong
    Anurak Tamerug
    Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018, 62 : 365 - 372
  • [44] Assessing the Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Rebound Tonometry
    Realini, Tony
    McMillan, Brian
    Gross, Ronald L.
    Devience, Eva
    Balasubramani, Goundappa K.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (08) : 629 - 633
  • [45] Effect of Repeated Applanation Tonometry on the Accuracy of Intraocular Pressure Measurements
    Gaton, Dan D.
    Ehrenberg, Miriam
    Lusky, Moshe
    Wussuki-Lior, Orly
    Dotan, Gad
    Weinberger, Dov
    Snir, Moshe
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2010, 35 (06) : 475 - 479
  • [46] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children REPLY
    Feng, Chi Shian
    Jin, Ki Won
    Yi, Kayoung
    Choi, Dong Gyu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 163 : 192 - 193
  • [47] Continuous 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) using a novel contact lens sensor: Comparison with pneumatonometry
    Gillmann, Kevin
    Wasilewicz, Robert
    Hoskens, Kirsten
    Simon-Zoula, Sonja
    Mansouri, Kaweh
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [48] Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the TGDc-01 tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Lösch, A
    Scheuerle, A
    Rupp, V
    Auffarth, G
    Becker, M
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (04) : 313 - 316
  • [49] Effects of Contact Lens Wear on Biometry Measurements for Intraocular Lens Calculations
    Meyer, Jay J.
    Kim, Michelle J.
    Kim, Terry
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 44 : S255 - S258
  • [50] Intraocular Pressure during Trabeculectomy. Comparison of Intuitive Compression Tonometry versus IC-200 Rebound Tonometry
    Tornero-Jimenez, Andrea
    Paczka, Jose A.
    Ponce Horta, Ana Maria
    Escobedo Espinoza, Jonathan
    Orozco Garcia, Andrea
    Fernanda Vazquez, Isis
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)