Intraocular Pressure and Steep Trendelenburg During Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: Is There a Risk?

被引:23
|
作者
Borahay, Mostafa A. [1 ]
Patel, Pooja R. [1 ]
Walsh, Teresa M. [1 ]
Tarnal, Vijay [2 ]
Koutrouvelis, Aristides [2 ]
Vizzeri, Gianmarco [3 ]
Jennings, Kristofer [4 ]
Jerig, Sean [1 ]
Kilic, Gokhan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Anesthesiol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Ophthalmol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Prevent Med & Community Hlth, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
Intraocular pressure; Robotic surgery; Trendelenburg; BODY POSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: Steep Trendelenburg position is frequently used during gynecologic minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, little attention has been given to the potential impact of this nonphysiologic positioning on patients, specifically intraocular pressure (TOP). The purpose of our study was to evaluate TOP changes during laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy conducted in the steep Trendelenburg position. Design: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: John Sealy Hospital at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. Patients: Female patients with no history of ocular pathology who underwent elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Interventions: The anesthesia protocol was standardized for all study patients. TOP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were obtained before anesthesia, after general anesthesia and intubation were achieved, after 1 hour of steep Trendelenburg positioning, after 2 hours of steep Trendelenburg positioning, and after the patient was returned to the supine position. Ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) was calculated using the following equation: OPP = MAP TOP. Main Results: A total of 10 patients were included in this prospective study. A significant increase in TOP from baseline was observed after 1 hour and 2 hours of steep Trendelenburg positioning (p = .005 and .002, respectively). There was a statistically significant trend of increasing the TOP from baseline to the second hour of steep Trendelenburg positioning (p < .001). The TOP remained significantly elevated once the patient was returned to the supine position when compared with the baseline TOP (p = .006). OPP significantly decreased from baseline after 2 hours of steep Trendelenburg positioning (p = .03). Conclusions: TOP increases significantly when patients are placed in the steep Trendelenburg position. Although further studies are needed to better characterize this process, given the aging population of our MIS patients in whom risk for glaucoma is significant, preoperative ocular health assessment should be considered in certain cases. (C) 2013 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 824
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electromechanical Morcellators in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An Update
    Driessen, Sara R. C.
    Arkenbout, Ewout A.
    Thurkow, Andreas L.
    Jansen, Frank-Willem
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 377 - 383
  • [42] New Developments in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery
    Stewart, Katherine Ikard
    Fader, Amanda N.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 60 (02): : 330 - 348
  • [43] INTRAOCULAR PRESSURES DURING ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURES UTILIZING STEEP TRENDELENBURG POSITIONING
    Christman, Matthew
    Mondzelewski, Todd
    Durbin, Jason
    Lujan, Eugenio
    L'Esperance, James
    Davis, Kimberly
    Auge, Brian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E284 - E285
  • [44] Risk Factors for Postoperative Narcotic Use in Benign, Minimally-Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
    Frost, Anja S.
    Kohn, Jaden
    Wang, Karen
    Simpson, Khara
    Patzkowsky, Kristin E.
    Wu, Harold
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2022, 26 (03)
  • [45] Safe Use of Electrosurgical Energy During Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Practical Guide
    Fogelson, Nicholas S.
    Mohling, Shanti, I
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2022, 38 (04) : 264 - 268
  • [47] Perioperative management for gynecologic minimally invasive surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Garcia-Ruiz, Nuria S.
    Ramirez-Caban, Laura
    Malekzadeh, Maral
    Padilla, Pamela Frazzini
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 33 (04) : 262 - 269
  • [48] Mobility Experiments With Microrobots for Minimally Invasive Intraocular Surgery
    Ullrich, Franziska
    Bergeles, Christos
    Pokki, Juho
    Ergeneman, Olgac
    Erni, Sandro
    Chatzipirpiridis, George
    Pane, Salvador
    Framme, Carsten
    Nelson, Bradley J.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (04) : 2853 - 2863
  • [49] The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Intraocular Pressure Increase in Patients During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in the Steep Trendelenburg Position
    Abe, Takashige
    Takada, Norikata
    Matsumoto, Ryuji
    Osawa, Takahiro
    Sazawa, Ataru
    Maruyama, Satoru
    Tsuchiya, Kunihiko
    Harabayashi, Toru
    Minami, Keita
    Nagamori, Satoshi
    Hatanaka, Kanako C.
    Tanaka, Yuka
    Shinohara, Nobuo
    Nonomura, Katsuya
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) : 304 - 309
  • [50] Cardiac Function and Hemodynamic Changes during Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy with Pneumoperitoneum and Steep Trendelenburg Position for Patients with Endometrial Cancer Who Are Obese
    Laskov, Ido
    Alpern, Sharon
    Ronel, Ilai
    Segal, Roy
    Zindel, Ofra
    Zoborovsky, Ilanit
    Michaan, Nadav
    Grisaru, Dan
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (05) : 1079 - 1085