Intraocular Pressure and Steep Trendelenburg During Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: Is There a Risk?

被引:23
|
作者
Borahay, Mostafa A. [1 ]
Patel, Pooja R. [1 ]
Walsh, Teresa M. [1 ]
Tarnal, Vijay [2 ]
Koutrouvelis, Aristides [2 ]
Vizzeri, Gianmarco [3 ]
Jennings, Kristofer [4 ]
Jerig, Sean [1 ]
Kilic, Gokhan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Anesthesiol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Ophthalmol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Prevent Med & Community Hlth, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
Intraocular pressure; Robotic surgery; Trendelenburg; BODY POSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: Steep Trendelenburg position is frequently used during gynecologic minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, little attention has been given to the potential impact of this nonphysiologic positioning on patients, specifically intraocular pressure (TOP). The purpose of our study was to evaluate TOP changes during laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy conducted in the steep Trendelenburg position. Design: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: John Sealy Hospital at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. Patients: Female patients with no history of ocular pathology who underwent elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Interventions: The anesthesia protocol was standardized for all study patients. TOP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were obtained before anesthesia, after general anesthesia and intubation were achieved, after 1 hour of steep Trendelenburg positioning, after 2 hours of steep Trendelenburg positioning, and after the patient was returned to the supine position. Ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) was calculated using the following equation: OPP = MAP TOP. Main Results: A total of 10 patients were included in this prospective study. A significant increase in TOP from baseline was observed after 1 hour and 2 hours of steep Trendelenburg positioning (p = .005 and .002, respectively). There was a statistically significant trend of increasing the TOP from baseline to the second hour of steep Trendelenburg positioning (p < .001). The TOP remained significantly elevated once the patient was returned to the supine position when compared with the baseline TOP (p = .006). OPP significantly decreased from baseline after 2 hours of steep Trendelenburg positioning (p = .03). Conclusions: TOP increases significantly when patients are placed in the steep Trendelenburg position. Although further studies are needed to better characterize this process, given the aging population of our MIS patients in whom risk for glaucoma is significant, preoperative ocular health assessment should be considered in certain cases. (C) 2013 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 824
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of Systemic Administration of Dexmedetomidine on Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure during Laparoscopic Surgery in a Steep Trendelenburg Position: Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study
    Joo, Jin
    Koh, Hyunjung
    Lee, Kusang
    Lee, Jaemin
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (06) : 989 - 996
  • [32] The Effect of Increased Intraocular Pressure During Steep Trendelenburg Positioning in Robotic Prostatectomy and Hysterectomy on Structural and Functional Ocular Parameters
    Awad, Hamdy
    Bai, Michael
    Ramadan, Mohamed Ehab
    Shabsigh, Ahmad
    Backes, Floor
    Craven, Mary Abigail
    Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
    Bergese, Sergio D.
    Slabaugh, Mark
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (04): : 975 - 982
  • [33] Venous Thromboembolic Events in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Nick, Alpa M.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 20 (06) : 766 - 769
  • [34] Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
    Youssef, Youssef
    Afaneh, Huda
    Borahay, Mostafa A.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2022, 26 (03)
  • [35] Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers: A Review
    Mattson, Jordan N.
    Bender, David P.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 63 (01): : 24 - 29
  • [36] The role of power morcellation in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery
    Boudova, B.
    Richtarova, A.
    Fruhauf, F.
    Fischerova, D.
    Mara, M.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 87 (04): : 289 - 294
  • [37] Current Controversies and Advances in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
    Kho, Kimberly A.
    CURRENT WOMENS HEALTH REVIEWS, 2018, 14 (01) : 3 - 3
  • [38] Holistic Approach to Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Preface
    Lee, Ted
    Donnellan, Nicole
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022, 49 (02) : XV - XVI
  • [39] Perioperative pain management in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery
    Womack, Ashley S.
    Smith, Rachael B.
    Mourad, Jamal
    Mahnert, Nichole D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 32 (04) : 277 - 284
  • [40] Considerations for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery in obese patients
    Louie, Michelle
    Toubia, Tarek
    Schiff, Lauren D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 28 (04) : 283 - 289