Prospect theory in the health domain: A quantitative assessment

被引:67
|
作者
Attema, Arthur E. [1 ]
Brouwer, Werner B. F. [1 ]
l'Haridon, Olivier [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, iBMG iMTA, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Rennes 1, Crem, F-35014 Rennes, France
[3] HEC Paris, Greghec, Paris, France
关键词
Loss aversion; Cumulative prospect theory; QALY model; Utility of life duration; TIME TRADE-OFF; PROBABILITY WEIGHTING FUNCTION; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; LOSS AVERSION; STANDARD GAMBLE; NONEXPECTED UTILITY; LIFE-YEARS; MARGINAL UTILITY; RISK PREFERENCES; DEPENDENT MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.08.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is well-known that expected utility (EU) has empirical deficiencies. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has developed as an alternative with more descriptive validity. However, CPT's full function had not yet been quantified in the health domain. This paper is therefore the first to simultaneously measure utility of life duration, probability weighting, and loss aversion in this domain. We observe loss aversion and risk aversion for gains and losses, which for gains can be explained by probabilistic pessimism. Utility for gains is almost linear. For losses, we find less weighting of probability 112 and concave utility. This contrasts with the common finding of convex utility for monetary losses. However, CPT was proposed to explain choices among lotteries involving monetary outcomes. Life years are arguably very different from monetary outcomes and need not generate convex utility for losses. Moreover, utility of life duration reflects discounting, causing concave utility. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1057 / 1065
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative health impact assessment of waste incineration
    McCarthy, M
    Utley, M
    Gallivan, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 12 (04): : 79 - 79
  • [42] Quantitative assessment of health risks in the printing industry
    Jaffre, L.
    Dab, W.
    ARCHIVES DES MALADIES PROFESSIONNELLES ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT, 2018, 79 (04) : 538 - 545
  • [43] Health needs assessment: Theory and practice
    Couchman, W
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1998, 28 (03) : 684 - 685
  • [44] Health impact assessment - theory into practice
    Scott-Samuel, A
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (11) : 704 - 705
  • [45] From Cognitive-Domain Theory to Assessment Practice
    Bennett, Randy E.
    Deane, Paul
    van Rijn, Peter W.
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 51 (01) : 82 - 107
  • [46] Testing Prospect Theory Parameters
    Balaz, Vladimir
    Bacova, Viera
    Drobna, Eva
    Dudekova, Katarina
    Adamik, Kamil
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2013, 61 (07): : 655 - 671
  • [47] Prospect theory and energy efficiency
    Heutel, Garth
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 96 : 236 - 254
  • [48] Rethinking the prospect theory of patents
    Duffy, JF
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2004, 71 (02): : 439 - 510
  • [49] Prospect Theory and the Newsvendor Problem
    Nagarajan, Mahesh
    Shechter, Steven
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 60 (04) : 1057 - 1062
  • [50] A TEST OF PROSPECT-THEORY
    TOLAND, A
    ONEILL, P
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1983, 4 (01) : 53 - 56