Prospect theory in the health domain: A quantitative assessment

被引:67
|
作者
Attema, Arthur E. [1 ]
Brouwer, Werner B. F. [1 ]
l'Haridon, Olivier [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, iBMG iMTA, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Rennes 1, Crem, F-35014 Rennes, France
[3] HEC Paris, Greghec, Paris, France
关键词
Loss aversion; Cumulative prospect theory; QALY model; Utility of life duration; TIME TRADE-OFF; PROBABILITY WEIGHTING FUNCTION; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; LOSS AVERSION; STANDARD GAMBLE; NONEXPECTED UTILITY; LIFE-YEARS; MARGINAL UTILITY; RISK PREFERENCES; DEPENDENT MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.08.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is well-known that expected utility (EU) has empirical deficiencies. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has developed as an alternative with more descriptive validity. However, CPT's full function had not yet been quantified in the health domain. This paper is therefore the first to simultaneously measure utility of life duration, probability weighting, and loss aversion in this domain. We observe loss aversion and risk aversion for gains and losses, which for gains can be explained by probabilistic pessimism. Utility for gains is almost linear. For losses, we find less weighting of probability 112 and concave utility. This contrasts with the common finding of convex utility for monetary losses. However, CPT was proposed to explain choices among lotteries involving monetary outcomes. Life years are arguably very different from monetary outcomes and need not generate convex utility for losses. Moreover, utility of life duration reflects discounting, causing concave utility. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1057 / 1065
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evolution Model of Health Food Safety Risk Based on Prospect Theory
    Luo, Jun
    Ma, Baichao
    Zhao, Yongle
    Chen, Tingqiang
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [22] Rethinking Risk: Prospect Theory Application in Health Message Framing Research
    Harrington, Nancy Grant
    Kerr, Anna M.
    HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2017, 32 (02) : 131 - 141
  • [23] Quantitative health impact assessment modelling
    Bronnum-Hansen, Henrik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 37 (05) : 447 - 449
  • [24] Prospect theory in multiple price list experiments: further insights on behaviour in the loss domain
    Bocqueho, Geraldine
    Jacob, Julien
    Brunette, Marielle
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2023, 94 (04) : 593 - 636
  • [25] Prospect theory in multiple price list experiments: further insights on behaviour in the loss domain
    Géraldine Bocquého
    Julien Jacob
    Marielle Brunette
    Theory and Decision, 2023, 94 : 593 - 636
  • [26] A test of prospect theory
    Feeny, D
    Eng, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 21 (04) : 511 - 516
  • [27] LOOKING AT PROSPECT THEORY
    Bromiley, Philip
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (12) : 1357 - 1370
  • [28] Priorities and prospect theory
    Happich M.
    Mazurek B.
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2002, 3 (1) : 40 - 46
  • [29] Health Status Assessment of Distributed Low-Carbon Energy Station Based on Grey-TOPSIS Improved By Prospect Theory
    Luo, YongHeng
    Jiang, Fei
    Liu, KaiCheng
    Zhang, Xinhe
    He, GuiXiong
    2022 IEEE/IAS INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEM ASIA (I&CPS ASIA 2022), 2022, : 521 - 526
  • [30] The Real Option Approach for Assessment of Big Data Asset Based on Prospect Theory
    Fang, Yinjie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2018, : 40 - 45