A Comparison of Two Practical Methods for Measurement of the Dielectric Constant of LTCC Substrates

被引:0
|
作者
Barteczka, Beata [1 ]
Slobodzian, Piotr [1 ]
Macioszczyk, Jan [1 ]
Golonka, Leszek [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Technol, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
dielectric constant measurements; method of two microstrip lines; the SPDR method; error analysis; COMPLEX PERMITTIVITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper describes a comparison of two methods that are used in practice to determine the dielectric constant of RF and microwave substrates, namely the method of two microstrip lines (the microstrip differential phase method) and SPDR (split post dielectric resonator) method. We compare accuracy of these two methods that is subject mainly to geometry measurements. Our case study, based on an LTCC (low temperature co-fired ceramic) material with high relative permittivity (epsilon(r) = 16), shows that the method of two microstrip lines has potential to give almost identical results to those from the SPDR method. Our approach, however, requires several samples to be measured, and the obtained results exhibit quite large standard deviation. In addition to this the approach is very sensitive to the quality of samples under test.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of two methods for the measurement of sperm concentration
    Sokol, RZ
    Shulman, P
    Paulson, RJ
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (03) : 591 - 594
  • [32] Comparison of two methods for measurement of equine insulin
    Banse, Heidi E.
    McCann, Joseph
    Yang, Fan
    Wagg, Catherine
    McFarlane, Dianne
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2014, 26 (04) : 527 - 530
  • [33] Comparison of two methods for measurement of equine adrenocorticotropin
    Banse, Heidi E.
    Schultz, Nichol
    McCue, Molly
    Geor, Ray
    McFarlane, Dianne
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2018, 30 (02) : 233 - 237
  • [34] Comparison of two methods for cervical length measurement
    Olson, G
    Barton, J
    Saade, G
    Hankins, G
    Anderson, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S251 - S251
  • [35] Comparison of two new methods for the measurement of lung volumes with two standard methods
    Cliff, IJ
    Evans, AH
    Pantin, CFA
    Baldwin, DR
    THORAX, 1999, 54 (04) : 329 - 333
  • [36] Two methods for the measurement of complex permittivity of microwave dielectric ceramics
    Xiao, F
    Chen, R
    Huang, ZY
    Xiong, ZX
    HIGH-PERFORMANCE CERAMICS III, PTS 1 AND 2, 2005, 280-283 : 61 - 64
  • [37] MEASUREMENT OF DIELECTRIC LOSS AND DIELECTRIC CONSTANT OF SMALL SPECIMENS
    SHELYUBSKII, VI
    INDUSTRIAL LABORATORY, 1969, 35 (05): : 673 - +
  • [38] Comparison of Grating Constant Measurement Methods for Plain Rainbow Holographic Materials
    Huang Min
    Xi Yonghui
    Li Xiu
    Guo Chunli
    He Ruili
    ACTA OPTICA SINICA, 2019, 39 (10)
  • [39] MEASUREMENT OF THE DIELECTRIC-CONSTANT OF SOIL
    SNOWDEN, DP
    MORRIS, GC
    VANLINT, VAJ
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1985, 32 (06) : 4312 - 4314
  • [40] Automatization of the complex dielectric constant measurement
    Atanaskovic, A
    Tasic, V
    Ivkovic, S
    TELSIKS 2001, VOL 1 & 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 691 - 694