A Comparison of Two Practical Methods for Measurement of the Dielectric Constant of LTCC Substrates

被引:0
|
作者
Barteczka, Beata [1 ]
Slobodzian, Piotr [1 ]
Macioszczyk, Jan [1 ]
Golonka, Leszek [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Technol, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
dielectric constant measurements; method of two microstrip lines; the SPDR method; error analysis; COMPLEX PERMITTIVITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper describes a comparison of two methods that are used in practice to determine the dielectric constant of RF and microwave substrates, namely the method of two microstrip lines (the microstrip differential phase method) and SPDR (split post dielectric resonator) method. We compare accuracy of these two methods that is subject mainly to geometry measurements. Our case study, based on an LTCC (low temperature co-fired ceramic) material with high relative permittivity (epsilon(r) = 16), shows that the method of two microstrip lines has potential to give almost identical results to those from the SPDR method. Our approach, however, requires several samples to be measured, and the obtained results exhibit quite large standard deviation. In addition to this the approach is very sensitive to the quality of samples under test.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE COMPARISON OF RADAR AND MICROWAVE RADIOMETRY METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE DIELECTRIC-CONSTANT
    YAKOVLEV, VP
    VUZMAN, IP
    IZVESTIYA VYSSHIKH UCHEBNYKH ZAVEDENII RADIOFIZIKA, 1988, 31 (04): : 421 - 425
  • [22] A New Approach to the Comparison of Microwave Methods Used at Dielectric Constant Assessment
    Faktorova, Dagmar
    Hadzima, Branislav
    Pastorek, Filip
    2013 36TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (TSP), 2013, : 344 - 347
  • [23] Comparison of the two-dimensional and multiplanar methods and establishment of a new constant for the measurement of fetal lung volume
    Junior, Edward Araujo
    Nardozza, Luciano Marcondes Machado
    Pires, Claudio Rodrigues
    Filho, Helio Antonio Guimaes
    Moron, Antonio Fernandes
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 21 (01): : 81 - 88
  • [24] Exploring Dielectric Constant and Dissipation Factor of LTCC Using Machine Learning
    Liu, Yu-chen
    Liu, Tzu-Yu
    Huang, Tien-Heng
    Chiu, Kuo-Chuang
    Lin, Shih-kang
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (19)
  • [25] Comparison of Two LTCC Pressure Sensors
    Tamas, Cosmin
    Marghescu, Cristina
    Ionescu, Ciprian
    Vasile, Alexandru
    ADVANCED TOPICS IN OPTOELECTRONICS, MICROELECTRONICS, AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES V, 2010, 7821
  • [26] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ON-SITE MEASUREMENT METHODS AND THEIR PRACTICAL ACCURACY
    Benigni, Helmut
    Leithner, Stefan
    Jaberg, Helmut
    Guggenberger, Mark
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 FLUIDS ENGINEERING DIVISION SUMMER MEETING (FEDSM2020), VOL 1, 2020,
  • [27] Measurement of thrombus formation: Comparison of two methods
    Harsfalvi, J
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 355 : S206 - S206
  • [28] Comparison of Two Methods for Phase Angle Measurement
    Velychko, Oleh
    Isaiev, Valentyn
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2019, 68 (06) : 1740 - 1747
  • [29] Comparison of two methods for the measurement of cortisol in urine
    Tahiri, N.
    Castillo, C.
    Cebrian Ballesteros, M.
    Loscocco, N.
    Prados, A.
    Urbina Lima, M. C.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2024, 558
  • [30] Light measurement in the hospital: A comparison of two methods
    Higgins, Patricia A.
    Winkelman, Chris
    Lipson, Amy R.
    Guo, Su-Er
    Rodgers, James
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2007, 30 (01) : 120 - 128