Physically informed artificial neural networks for atomistic modeling of materials

被引:207
|
作者
Pun, G. P. Purja [1 ]
Batra, R. [2 ]
Ramprasad, R. [2 ]
Mishin, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, MSN 3F3, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
GENERALIZED GRADIENT APPROXIMATION; POTENTIAL-ENERGY SURFACES; EMBEDDED-ATOM METHOD; INTERATOMIC POTENTIALS; HYDROCARBONS; METALS; CHEMISTRY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-019-10343-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Large-scale atomistic computer simulations of materials heavily rely on interatomic potentials predicting the energy and Newtonian forces on atoms. Traditional interatomic potentials are based on physical intuition but contain few adjustable parameters and are usually not accurate. The emerging machine-learning (ML) potentials achieve highly accurate interpolation within a large DFT database but, being purely mathematical constructions, suffer from poor transferability to unknown structures. We propose a new approach that can drastically improve the transferability of ML potentials by informing them of the physical nature of interatomic bonding. This is achieved by combining a rather general physics-based model (analytical bond-order potential) with a neural-network regression. This approach, called the physically informed neural network (PINN) potential, is demonstrated by developing a general-purpose PINN potential for Al. We suggest that the development of physics-based ML potentials is the most effective way forward in the field of atomistic simulations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling soil collapse by artificial neural networks
    Basma A.A.
    Kallas N.
    Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 2004, 22 (3) : 427 - 438
  • [32] Modeling of pain using artificial neural networks
    Haeri, M
    Asemani, D
    Gharibzadeh, S
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 220 (03) : 277 - 284
  • [33] THE ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND THE DRYING PROCESS MODELING
    JINESCU, G
    LAVRIC, V
    DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 13 (5-7) : 1579 - 1586
  • [34] Multifidelity modeling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)
    Penwarden, Michael
    Zhe, Shandian
    Narayan, Akil
    Kirby, Robert M.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2022, 451
  • [35] Physics-informed neural networks for modeling astrophysical shocks
    Moschou, S. P.
    Hicks, E.
    Parekh, R. Y.
    Mathew, D.
    Majumdar, S.
    Vlahakis, N.
    MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 4 (03):
  • [36] Physics-Informed Neural Networks with skip connections for modeling and
    Kittelsen, Jonas Ekeland
    Antonelo, Eric Aislan
    Camponogara, Eduardo
    Imsland, Lars Struen
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 158
  • [37] STUDY OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE "NOT" CATEGORY ON INFORMED CONSENT THROUGH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    Perez, Elena Martin
    Davila, Jacobo Salvat
    Martin, Quintin Martin
    JP JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2023, 23 (02) : 95 - 106
  • [38] Physics-informed neural networks with adaptive localized artificial viscosity
    Coutinho, Emilio Jose Rocha
    Dall'Aqua, Marcelo
    McClenny, Levi
    Zhong, Ming
    Braga-Neto, Ulisses
    Gildin, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2023, 489
  • [39] Physically Architected Recurrent Neural Networks for Nonlinear Dynamical Loudspeaker Modeling
    Gruber, Christian
    Enzner, Gerald
    Martin, Rainer
    IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2024, 72 : 5371 - 5387
  • [40] Physically Consistent Neural Networks for building thermal modeling: Theory and analysis
    Di Natale, L.
    Svetozarevic, B.
    Heer, P.
    Jones, C. N.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 325