Listening Effort and Perceived Clarity for Normal-Hearing Children With the Use of Digital Noise Reduction

被引:47
|
作者
Gustafson, Samantha [1 ,3 ]
McCreery, Ryan [2 ]
Hoover, Brenda [2 ]
Kopun, Judy G. [2 ]
Stelmachowicz, Pat [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Boys Town Natl Res Hosp, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Hearing & Speech Sci, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2014年 / 35卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Digital noise reduction; Children; Listening effort; Hearing aids; RESPONSE-TIME DISTRIBUTIONS; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; AID; INTELLIGIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHMS; ADULTS; AMPLIFICATION; RECOGNITION; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1097/01.aud.0000440715.85844.b8
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate how digital noise reduction (DNR) impacts listening effort and judgment of sound clarity in children with normal hearing. It was hypothesized that when two DNR algorithms differing in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) output are compared, the algorithm that provides the greatest improvement in overall output SNR will reduce listening effort and receive a better clarity rating from child listeners. A secondary goal was to evaluate the relation between the inversion method measurements and listening effort with DNR processing. Design: Twenty-four children with normal hearing (ages 7 to 12 years) participated in a speech recognition task in which consonant-vowel-consonant nonwords were presented in broadband background noise. Test stimuli were recorded through two hearing aids with DNR off and DNR on at 0 dB and +5 dB input SNR. Stimuli were presented to listeners and verbal response time (VRT) and phoneme recognition scores were measured. The underlying assumption was that an increase in VRT reflects an increase in listening effort. Children rated the sound clarity for each condition. The two commercially available HAs were chosen based on: (1) an inversion technique, which was used to quantify the magnitude of change in SNR with the activation of DNR, and (2) a measure of magnitude-squared coherence, which was used to ensure that DNR in both devices preserved the spectrum. Results: One device provided a greater improvement in overall output SNR than the other. Both DNR algorithms resulted in minimal spectral distortion as measured using coherence. For both devices, VRT decreased for the DNR-on condition, suggesting that listening effort decreased with DNR in both devices. Clarity ratings were also better in the DNR-on condition for both devices. The device showing the greatest improvement in output SNR with DNR engaged improved phoneme recognition scores. The magnitude of this improved phoneme recognition was not accurately predicted with measurements of output SNR. Measured output SNR varied in the ability to predict other outcomes. Conclusions: Overall, results suggest that DNR effectively reduces listening effort and improves subjective clarity ratings in children with normal hearing but that these improvements are not necessarily related to the output SNR improvements or preserved speech spectra provided by the DNR.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 194
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combined Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Speech Recognition Performance of Normal-Hearing Children and Adults
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Wroblewski, Marcin
    Hajicek, Joshua
    Rubinstein, Adrienne
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (03): : 336 - 344
  • [42] Listening effort in individuals with noise-induced hearing loss
    Shetty, Hemanth Narayan
    Raju, Suma
    Kumar, Yashwanth
    Singh, Sanjana S.
    [J]. HEARING BALANCE AND COMMUNICATION, 2022, 20 (04) : 263 - 271
  • [43] Quality of life, effort and disturbance perceived in noise: A comparison between employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing
    Hua, Hakan
    Karlsson, Jan
    Widen, Stephen
    Moller, Claes
    Lyxell, Bjorn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2013, 52 (09) : 642 - 649
  • [44] On the Pitch Strength of Bandpass Noise in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
    Horbach, Maria
    Verhey, Jesko L.
    Hots, Jan
    [J]. TRENDS IN HEARING, 2018, 22
  • [45] Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants
    Perreau, Ann E.
    Wu, Yu-Hsiang
    Tatge, Bailey
    Irwin, Diana
    Corts, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (08) : 685 - 697
  • [46] Listening through hearing aids affects spatial perception and speech intelligibility in normal-hearing listeners
    Cubick, Jens
    Buchholz, Jorg M.
    Best, Virginia
    Lavandier, Mathieu
    Dau, Torsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 144 (05): : 2896 - 2905
  • [47] PHONEME FEATURE PERCEPTION IN NOISE BY NORMAL-HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED SUBJECTS
    GORDONSALANT, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1985, 28 (01): : 87 - 95
  • [48] Music in noise recognition: An EEG study of listening effort in cochlear implant users and normal hearing controls
    Cartocci, Giulia
    Inguscio, Bianca Maria Serena
    Giorgi, Andrea
    Vozzi, Alessia
    Leone, Carlo Antonio
    Grassia, Rosa
    Di Nardo, Walter
    Di Cesare, Tiziana
    Fetoni, Anna Rita
    Freni, Francesco
    Ciodaro, Francesco
    Galletti, Francesco
    Albera, Roberto
    Canale, Andrea
    Piccioni, Lucia Oriella
    Babiloni, Fabio
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [49] HEARING-IMPAIRED CHILDREN AND THE PSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING OF THEIR NORMAL-HEARING SIBLINGS
    ISRAELITE, NK
    [J]. VOLTA REVIEW, 1986, 88 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [50] Developmental Effects and Spatial Hearing in Young Children With Normal-Hearing Sensitivity
    Schafer, Erin C.
    Beeler, Stephanie
    Ramos, Hope
    Morais, Mila
    Monzingo, Jamie
    Algier, Katherine
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2012, 33 (06): : E32 - E43