Listening Effort and Perceived Clarity for Normal-Hearing Children With the Use of Digital Noise Reduction

被引:47
|
作者
Gustafson, Samantha [1 ,3 ]
McCreery, Ryan [2 ]
Hoover, Brenda [2 ]
Kopun, Judy G. [2 ]
Stelmachowicz, Pat [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Boys Town Natl Res Hosp, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Hearing & Speech Sci, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2014年 / 35卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Digital noise reduction; Children; Listening effort; Hearing aids; RESPONSE-TIME DISTRIBUTIONS; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; AID; INTELLIGIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHMS; ADULTS; AMPLIFICATION; RECOGNITION; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1097/01.aud.0000440715.85844.b8
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate how digital noise reduction (DNR) impacts listening effort and judgment of sound clarity in children with normal hearing. It was hypothesized that when two DNR algorithms differing in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) output are compared, the algorithm that provides the greatest improvement in overall output SNR will reduce listening effort and receive a better clarity rating from child listeners. A secondary goal was to evaluate the relation between the inversion method measurements and listening effort with DNR processing. Design: Twenty-four children with normal hearing (ages 7 to 12 years) participated in a speech recognition task in which consonant-vowel-consonant nonwords were presented in broadband background noise. Test stimuli were recorded through two hearing aids with DNR off and DNR on at 0 dB and +5 dB input SNR. Stimuli were presented to listeners and verbal response time (VRT) and phoneme recognition scores were measured. The underlying assumption was that an increase in VRT reflects an increase in listening effort. Children rated the sound clarity for each condition. The two commercially available HAs were chosen based on: (1) an inversion technique, which was used to quantify the magnitude of change in SNR with the activation of DNR, and (2) a measure of magnitude-squared coherence, which was used to ensure that DNR in both devices preserved the spectrum. Results: One device provided a greater improvement in overall output SNR than the other. Both DNR algorithms resulted in minimal spectral distortion as measured using coherence. For both devices, VRT decreased for the DNR-on condition, suggesting that listening effort decreased with DNR in both devices. Clarity ratings were also better in the DNR-on condition for both devices. The device showing the greatest improvement in output SNR with DNR engaged improved phoneme recognition scores. The magnitude of this improved phoneme recognition was not accurately predicted with measurements of output SNR. Measured output SNR varied in the ability to predict other outcomes. Conclusions: Overall, results suggest that DNR effectively reduces listening effort and improves subjective clarity ratings in children with normal hearing but that these improvements are not necessarily related to the output SNR improvements or preserved speech spectra provided by the DNR.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 194
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Speech recognition in background noise: Monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients
    Persson, P
    Harder, H
    Arlinger, S
    Magnuson, B
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2001, 22 (05) : 625 - 630
  • [22] Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids
    Ching, Teresa Y. C.
    van Wanrooy, Emma
    Dillon, Harvey
    Carter, Lyndal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2011, 129 (01): : 368 - 375
  • [23] Sound localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners
    Lorenzi, C
    Gatehouse, S
    Lever, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 105 (03): : 1810 - 1820
  • [24] Cognitive skills and the effect of noise on perceived effort in employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing
    Hua, Hakan
    Emilsson, Magnus
    Ellis, Rachel
    Widen, Stephen
    Moller, Claes
    Lyxell, Bjorn
    [J]. NOISE & HEALTH, 2014, 16 (69): : 79 - 88
  • [25] Listening Effort in School-Age Children With Normal Hearing Compared to Children With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally
    Oosthuizen, Ilze
    Picou, Erin M.
    Pottas, Lidia
    Myburgh, Hermanus Carel
    Swanepoel, De Wet
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2021, 30 (02) : 309 - 324
  • [26] Speech Recognition in Noise 5-Year-Old Normal-Hearing Children
    Hagerman, Bjorn
    Hermansson, Emma
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 39 (01): : 52 - 60
  • [27] Active noise reduction versus conventional hearing protection - Relative benefits for normal-hearing and impaired listeners
    Abel, SM
    Spencer, DL
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1997, 26 (03): : 155 - 167
  • [28] Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners
    Stuart, A
    Phillips, DP
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 1996, 17 (06): : 478 - 489
  • [29] Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants
    Mao, Yitao
    Xu, Li
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 56 : S23 - S30
  • [30] Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners
    Schwander, T.
    Levitt, H.
    [J]. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 1987, 24 (04): : 87 - 92