Methylation in Predicting Progression of Untreated High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

被引:53
|
作者
Louvanto, Karolina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aro, Karoliina [3 ]
Nedjai, Belinda [2 ]
Butzow, Ralf [4 ,5 ]
Jakobsson, Maija [3 ]
Kalliala, Ilkka [3 ,6 ]
Dillner, Joakim [7 ]
Nieminen, Pekka [3 ]
Lorincz, Attila [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Turku, Finland
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Canc Prevent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Charterhouse Sq, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Pathol, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Imperial Coll, Fac Med, Inst Reprod & Dev Biol, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Lab Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
DNA methylation; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CIN; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; DNA; BIOMARKERS; DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFIER; REGRESSION; GENES; HPV18; HPV31;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciz677
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. There is no prognostic test to ascertain whether cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) regress or progress. The majority of CINs regress in young women, and treatments increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We investigated the ability of a DNA methylation panel (the S5 classifier) to discriminate between outcomes among young women with untreated CIN grade 2 (CIN2). Methods. Baseline pyrosequencing methylation and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assays were performed on cervical cells from 149 women with CIN2 in a 2-year cohort study of active surveillance. Results. Twenty-five lesions progressed to CIN grade 3 or worse, 88 regressed to less than CIN grade 1, and 36 persisted as CIN1/2. When cytology, HPV16/18 and HPV16/18/31/33 genotyping, and the S5 classifier were compared to outcomes, the S5 classifier was the strongest biomarker associated with regression vs progression. The S5 classifier alone or in combination with HPV16/18/31/33 genotyping also showed significantly increased sensitivity vs cytology when comparing regression vs persistence/progression. With both the S5 classifier and cytology set at a specificity of 38.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4-49.6), the sensitivity of the S5 classifier was significantly higher (83.6%; 95% CI, 71.9-91.8) than of cytology (62.3%; 95% CI, 49.0-74.4; P = 0.005). The highest area under the curve was 0.735 (95% CI, 0.621-0.849) in comparing regression vs progression with a combination of the S5 classifier and cytology, whereas HPV genotyping did not provide additional information. Conclusions. The S5 classifier shows high potential as a prognostic biomarker to identify progressive CIN2.
引用
收藏
页码:2582 / 2590
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Predictors for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women with Abnormal Smears
    Szarewski, Anne
    Ambroisine, Laurence
    Cadman, Louise
    Austin, Janet
    Ho, Linda
    Terry, George
    Liddle, Stuart
    Dina, Roberto
    McCarthy, Julie
    Buckley, Hilary
    Bergeron, Christine
    Soutter, Pat
    Lyons, Deirdre
    Cuzick, Jack
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (11) : 3033 - 3042
  • [42] Natural history of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review of prognostic biomarkers
    Koeneman, Margot M.
    Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M.
    Nijman, Hans W.
    Slangen, Brigitte F. M.
    Van Gorp, Toon
    Kruse, Arnold-Jan
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2015, 15 (04) : 527 - 546
  • [43] Intravaginal Application of Topical Black Salve for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Ayoub, Peter J.
    Parise, Angela
    [J]. OCHSNER JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (04): : 456 - 458
  • [44] Recurrent High-Grade Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Ditto, Antonino
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Maggiore, Umberto Leone Roberti
    Indini, Alice
    Lorusso, Domenica
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 : 223 - 223
  • [45] High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in dogs
    Waters, DJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 35 (5-6) : 456 - 458
  • [46] Epidemiology of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Sakr, WA
    Billis, A
    Ekman, P
    Wilt, T
    Bostwick, DG
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2000, 34 : 11 - 18
  • [47] EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HIGH-GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    SAKR, WA
    GRIGNON, DJ
    HAAS, GP
    SCHOMER, KL
    HEILBRUN, LK
    CASSIN, BJ
    POWELL, IJ
    MONTIE, JA
    PONTES, JE
    CRISSMAN, JD
    [J]. PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1995, 191 (09) : 838 - 841
  • [48] Cervical Eosinophilic Dysplasia - A newly recognized variant of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
    Ma, L
    Fisk, J
    Parkash, V
    Zheng, W
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2003, 16 (01) : 199A - 200A
  • [49] Cervical eosinophilic dysplasia - A newly recognized variant of high-grade cervical Intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
    Ma, L
    Fisk, J
    Parkash, V
    Zheng, W
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2003, 83 (01) : 199A - 200A
  • [50] Clinical validation of methylation biomarkers for optimal detection of high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia
    Voss, Feline O.
    Thuijs, Nikki B.
    Duin, Sylvia
    Ozer, Mujde
    van Beurden, Marc
    Berkhof, Johannes
    Steenbergen, Renske D. M.
    Bleeker, Maaike C. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 153 (04) : 783 - 791