Methylation in Predicting Progression of Untreated High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

被引:53
|
作者
Louvanto, Karolina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aro, Karoliina [3 ]
Nedjai, Belinda [2 ]
Butzow, Ralf [4 ,5 ]
Jakobsson, Maija [3 ]
Kalliala, Ilkka [3 ,6 ]
Dillner, Joakim [7 ]
Nieminen, Pekka [3 ]
Lorincz, Attila [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Turku, Finland
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Canc Prevent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Charterhouse Sq, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Pathol, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Imperial Coll, Fac Med, Inst Reprod & Dev Biol, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Lab Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
DNA methylation; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CIN; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; DNA; BIOMARKERS; DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFIER; REGRESSION; GENES; HPV18; HPV31;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciz677
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. There is no prognostic test to ascertain whether cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) regress or progress. The majority of CINs regress in young women, and treatments increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We investigated the ability of a DNA methylation panel (the S5 classifier) to discriminate between outcomes among young women with untreated CIN grade 2 (CIN2). Methods. Baseline pyrosequencing methylation and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assays were performed on cervical cells from 149 women with CIN2 in a 2-year cohort study of active surveillance. Results. Twenty-five lesions progressed to CIN grade 3 or worse, 88 regressed to less than CIN grade 1, and 36 persisted as CIN1/2. When cytology, HPV16/18 and HPV16/18/31/33 genotyping, and the S5 classifier were compared to outcomes, the S5 classifier was the strongest biomarker associated with regression vs progression. The S5 classifier alone or in combination with HPV16/18/31/33 genotyping also showed significantly increased sensitivity vs cytology when comparing regression vs persistence/progression. With both the S5 classifier and cytology set at a specificity of 38.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4-49.6), the sensitivity of the S5 classifier was significantly higher (83.6%; 95% CI, 71.9-91.8) than of cytology (62.3%; 95% CI, 49.0-74.4; P = 0.005). The highest area under the curve was 0.735 (95% CI, 0.621-0.849) in comparing regression vs progression with a combination of the S5 classifier and cytology, whereas HPV genotyping did not provide additional information. Conclusions. The S5 classifier shows high potential as a prognostic biomarker to identify progressive CIN2.
引用
收藏
页码:2582 / 2590
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] MicroRNA Biomarkers of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Liquid Biopsy
    Causin, Rhafaela L.
    da Silva, Luciane S.
    Evangelista, Adriane F.
    Leal, Leticia F.
    Souza, Karen C. B.
    Pessoa-Pereira, Danielle
    Matsushita, Graziela M.
    Reis, Rui M.
    Fregnani, Jose H. T. G.
    Marques, Marcia M. C.
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [23] Oral Human Papillomavirus in Women With High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Woelber, Linn
    Breuer, Julia
    Meyer, Thomas
    Vettorazzi, Eik
    Prieske, Katharina
    Bohlmann, Inga
    Busch, Chia-Jung
    Teudt, Ingo
    Brummer, Oliver
    Mueller, Volkmar
    Schmalfeldt, Barbara
    Grimm, Donata
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2017, 21 (03) : 177 - 183
  • [24] Focal treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a pilot study
    Craig, Amaranta D.
    Khan, Michelle J.
    Singhrao, Ruby
    Sawaya, George F.
    Bae, Sejong
    Kamali, Deborah
    Huh, Warner
    Smith-McCune, Karen K.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 147 (01) : 209 - 209
  • [25] High-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia: Progression to invasive cancer is not a certainty
    Gautier, Mathilde
    Brochard, Charlene
    Lion, Annie
    Henno, Sebastien
    Mallet, Anne Laure
    Bodere, Anais
    Bouguen, Guillaume
    Lievre, Astrid
    Siproudhis, Laurent
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2016, 48 (07) : 806 - 811
  • [26] Detection of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Women Diagnosed with Low-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Cytology
    Panagakis, Georgios
    Papapanagiotou, Ioannis K.
    Theofanakis, Charalampos
    Tsetsa, Paraskevi
    Kontogeorgi, Adamantia
    Thomakos, Nikolaos
    Rodolakis, Alexandros
    Haidopoulos, Dimitrios
    [J]. LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [27] The challenge of cervical screening: to find and treat high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at risk of progression in women of childbearing age
    Herbert, A.
    [J]. CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [28] EFFICACY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF HIGH-GRADE CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA AND CERVICAL CANCER
    Golubenko, Aleksei
    Lokshina, Alesia
    Golubenko, Ramilia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A124 - A124
  • [29] Predictors of recurrence in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization
    Ge, Yan
    Liu, Yongli
    Cheng, Yun
    Liu, Yanbo
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (27)
  • [30] Genital papillomavirus in Greek women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma
    Labropoulou, V
    Diakomanolis, E
    Dailianas, S
    Kalpaktsoglou, K
    Rodolakis, A
    Beaudenon, S
    Kakkanas, A
    Mavromara, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 1996, 48 (01) : 80 - 87