Methylation in Predicting Progression of Untreated High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

被引:53
|
作者
Louvanto, Karolina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aro, Karoliina [3 ]
Nedjai, Belinda [2 ]
Butzow, Ralf [4 ,5 ]
Jakobsson, Maija [3 ]
Kalliala, Ilkka [3 ,6 ]
Dillner, Joakim [7 ]
Nieminen, Pekka [3 ]
Lorincz, Attila [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Turku, Finland
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Canc Prevent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Charterhouse Sq, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Pathol, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Imperial Coll, Fac Med, Inst Reprod & Dev Biol, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Lab Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
DNA methylation; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CIN; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; DNA; BIOMARKERS; DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFIER; REGRESSION; GENES; HPV18; HPV31;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciz677
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. There is no prognostic test to ascertain whether cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) regress or progress. The majority of CINs regress in young women, and treatments increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We investigated the ability of a DNA methylation panel (the S5 classifier) to discriminate between outcomes among young women with untreated CIN grade 2 (CIN2). Methods. Baseline pyrosequencing methylation and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assays were performed on cervical cells from 149 women with CIN2 in a 2-year cohort study of active surveillance. Results. Twenty-five lesions progressed to CIN grade 3 or worse, 88 regressed to less than CIN grade 1, and 36 persisted as CIN1/2. When cytology, HPV16/18 and HPV16/18/31/33 genotyping, and the S5 classifier were compared to outcomes, the S5 classifier was the strongest biomarker associated with regression vs progression. The S5 classifier alone or in combination with HPV16/18/31/33 genotyping also showed significantly increased sensitivity vs cytology when comparing regression vs persistence/progression. With both the S5 classifier and cytology set at a specificity of 38.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4-49.6), the sensitivity of the S5 classifier was significantly higher (83.6%; 95% CI, 71.9-91.8) than of cytology (62.3%; 95% CI, 49.0-74.4; P = 0.005). The highest area under the curve was 0.735 (95% CI, 0.621-0.849) in comparing regression vs progression with a combination of the S5 classifier and cytology, whereas HPV genotyping did not provide additional information. Conclusions. The S5 classifier shows high potential as a prognostic biomarker to identify progressive CIN2.
引用
收藏
页码:2582 / 2590
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prevalence of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in immunocompetent women treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Monti, Ermelinda
    Salmaso, Marta
    Alberico, Daniela
    Cetera, Giulia Emily
    Viscardi, Anna
    Boero, Veronica
    Di Loreto, Eugenia
    Libutti, Giada
    Roncella, Elena
    Barbara, Giussy
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 291 : 82 - 87
  • [2] Regression and progression rates of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2
    Lycke, Kathrine Dyhr
    Kahlert, Johnny
    Damgaard, Rikke Kamp
    Eriksen, Dina Overgaard
    Bennetsen, Mary Holten
    Petersen, Lone Kjeld
    Gravitt, Patti
    Hammer, Anne
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 : 80 - 80
  • [3] GENETIC PROFILING OF HIGH-GRADE CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    Bierkens, Mariska
    Wilting, Saskia M.
    Meijer, Chris J. L. M.
    Ylstra, Bauke
    Snijders, Peter J. F.
    Steenbergen, Renske D. M.
    [J]. CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2009, 31 (02) : 147 - 148
  • [4] Investigating Human Papillomavirus 16 Methylation as a Biomarker for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Mir, Saira
    Domjahn, Briyana
    Ault, Kevin A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 184S - 185S
  • [5] CHARACTERIZATION OF HIGH-GRADE AND LOW-GRADE CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    SHAFI, MI
    DUNN, JA
    FINN, CB
    KEHOE, S
    BUXTON, EJ
    JORDAN, JA
    LUESLEY, DM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1993, 3 (04) : 203 - 207
  • [6] Association between PEG3 DNA methylation and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Claire Bosire
    Adriana C. Vidal
    Jennifer S. Smith
    Dereje Jima
    Zhiqing Huang
    David Skaar
    Fidel Valea
    Rex Bentley
    Margaret Gradison
    Kimberly S. H. Yarnall
    Anne Ford
    Francine Overcash
    Susan K. Murphy
    Cathrine Hoyo
    [J]. Infectious Agents and Cancer, 16
  • [7] Association between PEG3 DNA methylation and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Bosire, Claire
    Vidal, Adriana C.
    Smith, Jennifer S.
    Jima, Dereje
    Huang, Zhiqing
    Skaar, David
    Valea, Fidel
    Bentley, Rex
    Gradison, Margaret
    Yarnall, Kimberly S. H.
    Ford, Anne
    Overcash, Francine
    Murphy, Susan K.
    Hoyo, Cathrine
    [J]. INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [8] High-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia after hysterectomy for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Is hysterectomy a "definitive" treatment compared to conization?
    Tanaka, Miyu
    Yamanoi, Koji
    Taki, Mana
    Kitamura, Sachiko
    Sunada, Masumi
    Chigusa, Yoshitsugu
    Horie, Akihito
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Hamanishi, Junzo
    Mandai, Masaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (09) : 2361 - 2369
  • [9] Colposcopic regression patterns in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Brewer, CA
    Wilczynski, SP
    Kurosaki, T
    Daood, R
    Berman, ML
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (04): : 617 - 621
  • [10] Umbilication Is a Strong Predictor of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Slama, Jiri
    Adamcova, Karolina
    Dusek, Ladislav
    Sosna, Ondrej
    Cibula, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2013, 17 (03) : 303 - 307