Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform

被引:24
|
作者
Mowrey, KA
Cheng, Y
Tchou, PJ
Efimov, IR
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Cardiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
EUROPACE | 2002年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
defibrillation; defibrillation shock waveforms; sudden cardiac death; cellular response to defibrillation shocks; virtual electrode; polarization;
D O I
10.1053/eupc.2001.0199
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is a well-established therapy for treating patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Recently formulated virtual electrode polarization theory is a promising foundation for the theory of defibrillation. Yet, continuing optimization of defibrillation therapy is limited to primarily empirical methods due to difficulties in assessing kinetics of cellular response in whole heart models of defibrillation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of the myocardium in the context of virtual electrode polarization. Methods and results We used a Langendorff-perfused rabbit heart model of ICD therapy and voltage-sensitive fluorescent dye imaging in order to map kinetics of transmembrane potential during both mono- and biphasic shocks applied at various phases of the QT-interval. Cellular response was fitted to a single exponential function using the Levenberg-Marquardt method. Time constants (tau) were measured in 45 288 optical records from 17 hearts. We found that cellular response depends upon both QT-phase of application, intensity, polarity, and phase of the biphasic waveform. Shocks of larger strengths produce a faster response. The tau of the first-phase negatively polarizing response was significantly larger compared with the positively polarizing response at intensities below 200 V, but smaller at 200 V and above. The tau of the second phase negatively polarizing response was always slower than the positively polarizing response, regardless of amplitude, and timing. Overall, tau ranged from 1.6 ms to 14.2 ms. Conclusions The time constant or the membrane depends on the field, action potential phase and the shock polarity, but exceeds I msec. Therefore, we suggest using a slower shock leading edge, since, the membrane cannot follow potentially damaging faster waveforms. (C) 2002 The European Society of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 39
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design of a real-time ventricular fibrillation waveform analysis system for improved low energy DC defibrillation shock delivery
    Hsia, PW
    Mendoza, D
    Gurunathan, S
    Naik, S
    Damiano, R
    COMPUTERS IN CARDIOLOGY 1996, 1996, : 349 - 352
  • [32] Impact of defibrillation testing on predicted ICD shock efficacy: Implications for clinical practice
    Smits, Karel
    Virag, Nathalie
    Swerdlow, Charles D.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2013, 10 (05) : 709 - 717
  • [33] Kinetics theory of shock-induced structural heterogenization
    Meshcheryakov, Yurii
    XXVII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER SIMULATION IN MECHANICS OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES - FUNDAMENTALS OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC FRACTURE (MCM 2017), 2017, 6 : 109 - 114
  • [34] Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on membrane response to shocks: Implications to defibrillation mechanisms
    Akar, FG
    Pastore, JM
    Girouard, SD
    Laurita, KR
    Rosenbaum, DS
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 937 - 937
  • [35] Defibrillation waveform and post-shock rhythm in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest
    Carpenter, J
    Rea, TD
    Murray, JA
    Kudenchuk, PJ
    Eisenberg, MS
    RESUSCITATION, 2003, 59 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [36] Optimization of transthoracic ventricular defibrillation-biphasic and triphasic shocks, waveform rounding, and synchronized shock delivery
    Kidwai, BJ
    McIntyre, A
    Anderson, J
    Adgey, AAJ
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2002, 35 (03) : 235 - 244
  • [37] SHOCK-INDUCED RESPONSE BURSTS AND SUPPRESSION
    WEISS, KM
    STRONGMA.KT
    PSYCHONOMIC SCIENCE, 1969, 15 (05): : 238 - &
  • [38] Is there an optimal shape of the defibrillation shock: Constant current vs. pulsed biphasic waveforms?
    Dotsinsky, Ivan
    Mudrov, Tsvetan
    Krasteva, Vessela
    Kostov, Jecho
    International Journal Bioautomation, 2013, 17 (01) : 45 - 56
  • [39] Prehospital optimal shock energy for defibrillation (POSED): A cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial
    Pocock, Helen
    Deakin, Charles
    Lall, Ranjit
    Michelet, Felix
    Sun, Chu
    Smith, Deb
    Hill, Catherine
    Rai, Jeskaran
    Starr, Kath
    Brown, Martina
    Rodriguez-Bachiller, Isabel
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2024, 17
  • [40] Optimal Phase Relationship between Defibrillation and Mechanical Chest Compressions Improves Shock Success
    Li, Yongqin
    Wang, Hao
    Cho, Jun Hwi
    Quan, Weilun
    Freeman, Gary
    Bisera, Joe
    Weil, Max Harry
    Tang, Wanchun
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (18) : S822 - S822