Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform

被引:24
|
作者
Mowrey, KA
Cheng, Y
Tchou, PJ
Efimov, IR
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Cardiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
EUROPACE | 2002年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
defibrillation; defibrillation shock waveforms; sudden cardiac death; cellular response to defibrillation shocks; virtual electrode; polarization;
D O I
10.1053/eupc.2001.0199
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is a well-established therapy for treating patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Recently formulated virtual electrode polarization theory is a promising foundation for the theory of defibrillation. Yet, continuing optimization of defibrillation therapy is limited to primarily empirical methods due to difficulties in assessing kinetics of cellular response in whole heart models of defibrillation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of the myocardium in the context of virtual electrode polarization. Methods and results We used a Langendorff-perfused rabbit heart model of ICD therapy and voltage-sensitive fluorescent dye imaging in order to map kinetics of transmembrane potential during both mono- and biphasic shocks applied at various phases of the QT-interval. Cellular response was fitted to a single exponential function using the Levenberg-Marquardt method. Time constants (tau) were measured in 45 288 optical records from 17 hearts. We found that cellular response depends upon both QT-phase of application, intensity, polarity, and phase of the biphasic waveform. Shocks of larger strengths produce a faster response. The tau of the first-phase negatively polarizing response was significantly larger compared with the positively polarizing response at intensities below 200 V, but smaller at 200 V and above. The tau of the second phase negatively polarizing response was always slower than the positively polarizing response, regardless of amplitude, and timing. Overall, tau ranged from 1.6 ms to 14.2 ms. Conclusions The time constant or the membrane depends on the field, action potential phase and the shock polarity, but exceeds I msec. Therefore, we suggest using a slower shock leading edge, since, the membrane cannot follow potentially damaging faster waveforms. (C) 2002 The European Society of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 39
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanisms of superiority of ascending ramp waveforms: new insights into mechanisms of shock-induced vulnerability and defibrillation
    Qu, FJ
    Li, L
    Nikolski, VP
    Sharma, V
    Efimov, IR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 289 (02): : H569 - H577
  • [22] Intracellular calcium transient dynamics and the mechanism of shock-induced ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation in rabbit hearts
    Hwang, GS
    Hayashi, H
    Tang, L
    Ogawa, M
    Hernandez, H
    Tan, AY
    Karagueuzian, HS
    Weiss, JN
    Lin, SF
    Chen, PS
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (04) : 3A - 3A
  • [23] Reply to "On the optimal defibrillation waveform-how to reconcile theory and experiment?"
    Malkin, Robert A.
    Jackson, Stephanie R.
    Nguyen, Jennifer
    Yang, Zhao
    Guan, Dongxu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 53 (08) : 1726 - 1727
  • [24] The Optimal Second Phase Duration for Biphasic Truncated Exponential Waveform Defibrillation
    Li, Yongqin
    Wang, Hao
    Cho, Jun Hwi
    Fuller, Marc
    Russell, James
    Bisera, Joe
    Weil, Max Harry
    Tang, Wanchun
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (18) : S1473 - S1474
  • [25] Evaluation of shock waveform configuration on the defibrillation capacity of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in dogs
    Pariaut, Romain
    Saelinger, Carley
    Vila, Jorge
    Deforge, William
    Queiroz-Williams, Patricia
    Beaufrere, Hugues
    Zimmerman, Michael
    Saile, Katrin
    Reynolds, Caryn A.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 14 (03) : 389 - 398
  • [26] Effect of shock waveform on relationship between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold
    Swerdlow, CD
    Kass, RM
    O'Connor, ME
    Chen, PS
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (04) : 339 - 349
  • [27] Mechanisms of pain associated with internal defibrillation shocks: Results of a randomized study of shock waveform
    Boriani, G
    Biffi, M
    Silvestri, P
    Martignani, C
    Valzania, C
    Diemberger, I
    Moulder, C
    Mouchawar, G
    Kroll, M
    Branzi, A
    HEART RHYTHM, 2005, 2 (07) : 708 - 713
  • [28] Synchronized defibrillation shock delivery based on endocardial ventricular fibrillation waveform analysis is lead dependent
    Gurunathan, S
    Fain, E
    Damiano, R
    Hsia, PW
    COMPUTERS IN CARDIOLOGY 1996, 1996, : 553 - 556
  • [29] The effect of polarity of the initial phase of a biphasic shock waveform on the defibrillation threshold of pectorally implanted defibrillators
    Keelan, ET
    Sra, JS
    Axtell, K
    Maglio, C
    Underwood, RD
    Desphande, S
    Biehl, M
    Dhala, A
    Blanck, Z
    Jazayeri, MR
    Akhtar, M
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (02): : 337 - 342
  • [30] Electrode surface and optimal shock pulse shape for temporary internal atrial defibrillation
    Andraghetti, A
    PACEMAKER LEADS 1997, 1997, : 589 - 594