Comparative analyses of forest fuels in a life cycle perspective with a focus on transport systems

被引:25
|
作者
Eriksson, Lisa Naeslund [1 ]
机构
[1] Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Engn Math & Phys, SE-83125 Ostersund, Sweden
关键词
Chips; Bundles; Pellets; Transportation; Primary energy; CO2; emissions; Costs; Dry-matter losses; Life cycle perspective;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.06.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Local, national and international transportation of forest fuels with regard to costs, primary energy use and CO2 emission was analysed. The main issue was the extent to which both mode and distance of transport affect the monetary cost, CO2 emission and primary energy use arising from the use of various types of forest residues for energy purpose. Local applications proved the most efficient options of those studied. Chipping of bundles at a terminal, for transport by rail and sea to national or international end-users, has low costs and produces only modest CO2 emissions. For the pellet options, the cost is about the same as for chipping, but require more primary energy and emit more CO2. The traditional chipping system is more expensive than the other options. The costs of the international options over a transport distance of 1100 km vary between 21 and 28 is an element of(2007)/MWh, whereas pellet options cost between 22 and 25 is an element of(2007)/MWh. The primary energy required for transport of logging residues vis-A-vis pellets falls in the range 4-7% and 2-4%, respectively, of the bio-energy delivered. The primary energy needed to produce pellets gives them a lower fossil fuel substitution rate per hectare, compared with bundle systems. Similarly, for chip systems vis-A-vis bundle systems, the biomass delivered to the conversion plant is reduced by the greater physical dry-matter losses entailed by chipping systems in the forest-fuel chain. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1190 / 1197
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Energy balance and global warming potential of biogas-based fuels from a life cycle perspective
    Moghaddam, Elham Ahmadi
    Ahlgren, Serina
    Hulteberg, Christian
    Nordberg, Ake
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 132 : 74 - 82
  • [42] Comparative assessment of sewage sludge disposal alternatives in Mashhad: a life cycle perspective
    Fatemeh Rostami
    Seyyed Mohammad Tafazzoli
    Samaneh Tavakoli Aminian
    Akram Avami
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 315 - 333
  • [43] Biogas-to-biomethane upgrading: A comparative review and assessment in a life cycle perspective
    Ardolino, F.
    Cardamone, G. F.
    Parrillo, F.
    Arena, U.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 139
  • [44] Social capital and Internet use in an age-comparative perspective with a focus on later life
    Neves, Barbara Barbosa
    Fonseca, Jaime R. S.
    Amaro, Fausto
    Pasqualotti, Adriano
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [45] Comparative assessment of sewage sludge disposal alternatives in Mashhad: a life cycle perspective
    Rostami, Fatemeh
    Tafazzoli, Seyyed Mohammad
    Aminian, Samaneh Tavakoli
    Avami, Akram
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (01) : 315 - 333
  • [46] Management accounting systems and organizational configuration: a life-cycle perspective
    Moores, K
    Yuen, S
    [J]. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2001, 26 (4-5) : 351 - 389
  • [47] Skills for the Future? A Life Cycle Perspective on Systems of Vocational Education and Training
    Chuan, Amanda
    Ibsen, Christian Lyhne
    [J]. ILR REVIEW, 2022, 75 (03) : 638 - 664
  • [48] A systems life cycle approach to managing the radiology profession: an Australian perspective
    Taba, Seyedamir Tavakoli
    Atkinson, Simon Reay
    Lewis, Sarah
    Chung, Kon Shing Kenneth
    Hossain, Liaquat
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2015, 39 (02) : 228 - 239
  • [49] Life cycle environmental and economic impact assessment of alternative transport fuels and power-train technologies
    Sharma, Ashish
    Strezov, Vladimir
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 133 : 1132 - 1141
  • [50] Life Cycle Assessment of Electric and Fuel Cell Vehicle Transport Based on Forest Biomass
    Singh, Bhawna
    Guest, Geoffrey
    Bright, Ryan M.
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 18 (02) : 176 - 186