Life Cycle Assessment of Electric and Fuel Cell Vehicle Transport Based on Forest Biomass

被引:14
|
作者
Singh, Bhawna [1 ,2 ]
Guest, Geoffrey
Bright, Ryan M.
Stromman, Anders Hammer
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ind Ecol Program IndEcol, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
bioenergy; industrial ecology; impact assessment; biohydrogen; fuel cell; electric vehicles; LAND-USE; ENERGY; IMPACTS; CLIMATE; BIOFUELS; COMBUSTION; EFFICIENCY; EXPANSION; EMISSIONS; NORWAY;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Use of biomass-based electricity and hydrogen in alternative transport could provide environmentally sustainable transport options with possible improvements in greenhouse gas balance. We perform a life cycle assessment of electric vehicle (EV) and fuel cell vehicle (FCV) powered by bioelectricity and biohydrogen, respectively, derived from Norwegian boreal forest biomass, considering the nonclimate neutrality of biological carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and alteration in surface albedo resulting from biomass harvesting-both with and without CO2 capture and storage (CCS)-while benchmarking these options against EVs powered by the average European electricity mix. Results show that with due consideration of the countering effects from global warming potential (GWP) factors for biogenic CO2 emissions and change in radiative forcing of the surface for the studied region, bioenergy-based EVs and FCVs provide reductions of approximately 30%, as compared to the reference EV powered by the average European electricity mix. With CCS coupled to bioenergy production, the biomass-based vehicle transport results in a net global warming impact reduction of approximately 110% to 120% (giving negative GWP and creating a climate-cooling benefit from biomass use). Other environmental impacts vary from -60% to +60%, with freshwater eutrophication showing maximum reductions (40% for the EV case and 60% for the FCV case) and photochemical oxidation showing a maximum increase (60% in the FCV value chain).
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 186
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional combustion engine vehicle, battery electric vehicle and fuel cell electric vehicle in Nepal
    Joshi, Ashim
    Sharma, Raghav
    Baral, Bivek
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 379
  • [2] Review of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles in Road Transport
    Burchart, Dorota
    Przytula, Iga
    ENERGIES, 2025, 18 (05)
  • [3] Life Cycle GHG of NG-Based Fuel and Electric Vehicle in China
    Ou, Xunmin
    Zhang, Xiliang
    Zhang, Xu
    Zhang, Qian
    ENERGIES, 2013, 6 (05) : 2644 - 2662
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment Model for Biomass Fuel Briquetting
    Rukayya Ibrahim Muazu
    Aiduan Li Borrion
    Julia A. Stegemann
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2022, 13 : 2461 - 2476
  • [5] Life cycle assessment on energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle in China
    Lu, Qiang
    Zhang, Bo
    Yang, Shichun
    Peng, Zhaoxia
    ENERGY, 2022, 257
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of an autonomous underwater vehicle that employs hydrogen fuel cell
    Sanchez, Pedro Jose Barnalte
    Marquez, Fausto Pedro Garcia
    Papaelias, Mayorkinos
    SUSTAINABLE FUTURES, 2023, 6
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment Model for Biomass Fuel Briquetting
    Muazu, Rukayya Ibrahim
    Borrion, Aiduan Li
    Stegemann, Julia A.
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2022, 13 (04) : 2461 - 2476
  • [8] Life Cycle Analysis of Hydrogen Production and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle in Indian Conditions
    Das, Jani
    2022 IEEE 19TH INDIA COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, INDICON, 2022,
  • [9] Integrating aerosol emissions of forest biomass into a life cycle assessment of forest-based production
    Vento, Eerik
    Hartikainen, Anni
    Tikka, Aapo
    Lamberg, Heikki
    Sippula, Olli
    Kilpelainen, Antti
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2024, 183
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of fuel cell-based APUs
    Baratto, F
    Diwekar, UM
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2005, 139 (1-2) : 188 - 196