A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis

被引:48
|
作者
Zamora, Natalia
Llamas, Jose-Maria [1 ]
Cibrian, Rosa [2 ]
Gandia, Jose-Luis [1 ]
Paredes, Vanessa
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Orthodont, Postgrad Orthodont Masters Course, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Physiol, Valencia, Spain
来源
关键词
Cone Beam Computed Tomography; cephalometry; landmark; orthodontics; reliability; LINEAR ACCURACY; BEAM; IDENTIFICATION; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.4317/medoral.17721
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) allows the possibility of modifying some of the diagnostic tools used in orthodontics, such as cephalometry. The first step must be to study the characteristics of these devices in terms of accuracy and reliability of the most commonly used landmarks. The aims were 1- To assess intra and inter-observer reliability in the location of anatomical landmarks belonging to hard tissues of the skull in images taken with a CBCT device, 2- To determine which of those landmarks are more vs. less reliable and 3- To introduce planes of reference so as to create cephalometric analyses appropriated to the 3D reality. Study design: Fifteen patients who had a CBCT (i-CAT (R)) as a diagnostic register were selected. To assess the reproducibility on landmark location and the differences in the measurements of two observers at different times, 41 landmarks were defined on the three spatial axes (X,Y,Z) and located. 3.690 measurements were taken and, as each determination has 3 coordinates, 11.070 data were processed with SPSS (R) statistical package. To discover the reproducibility of the method on landmark location, an ANOVA was undertaken using two variation factors: time (t1, t2 and t3) and observer (Ob1 and Ob2) for each axis (X, Y and Z) and landmark. The order of the CBCT scans submitted to the observers (Ob1, Ob2) at t1, t2, and t3, were different and randomly allocated. Multiple comparisons were undertaken using the Bonferroni test. The intra- and inter-examiner ICC's were calculated. Results: Intra- and inter- examiner reliability was high, both being ICC >= 0.99, with the best frequency on axis Z. Conclusions: The most reliable landmarks were: Nasion, Sella, Basion, left Porion, point A, anterior nasal spine, Pogonion, Gnathion, Menton, frontozygomatic sutures, first lower molars and upper and lower incisors. Those with less reliability were the supraorbitals, right zygion and posterior nasal spine.
引用
收藏
页码:E678 / E688
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A technique for three-dimensional cephalometric analysis as an aid in evaluating changes in the craniofacial skeleton
    Haffner, CL
    Pessa, JE
    Zadoo, VP
    Garza, JR
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1999, 69 (04) : 345 - 348
  • [32] Comparison of the observer reliability of cranial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiograph and three-dimensional computed tomography scans
    Kim, Jae-Young
    Lee, Dong-Keun
    Lee, Sang-Han
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2010, 36 (04) : 262 - 269
  • [33] The Reliability of Three-Dimensional Landmark-Based Craniomaxillofacial and Airway Cephalometric Analysis
    Yao, Kan
    Xie, Yilun
    Xia, Liang
    Wei, Silong
    Yu, Wenwen
    Shen, Guofang
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (14)
  • [34] Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis:: experimental validation in vitro
    Olszewski, R.
    Zech, F.
    Cosnard, G.
    Nicolas, V.
    Macq, B.
    Reychler, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 36 (09) : 828 - 833
  • [35] Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis of Orbital Morphology Modification for Midface Correction Surgery
    Smektala T.
    Staniszewska E.
    Sławińska A.
    Sporniak-Tutak K.
    Tutak M.
    Jędrzejewski M.
    Chrusciel-Nogalska M.
    Olszewski R.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2016, 15 (3) : 285 - 292
  • [36] Pilot study for three-dimensional cephalometric Enlow's counterpart analysis: Vertical track. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional comparison
    D'Attilio, Michele
    Falone, Giulia
    Pipitone, Rossana
    Moscagiuri, Francesco
    Caroccia, Francesco
    Peluso, Antonino
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [37] Bone Modifications Induced by Rapid Maxillary Expander: A Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Pilot Study Comparing Two Different Cephalometric Software Programs
    Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
    Pascadopoli, Maurizio
    Dicorato, Serena
    Todaro, Claudia
    Nardi, Maria Gloria
    Gallo, Simone
    Gandini, Paola
    Scribante, Andrea
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [38] Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks-a three-dimensional computed tomography study
    Titiz, Irem
    Laubinger, Michala
    Keller, Thomas
    Hertrich, Klaus
    Hirschfelder, Ursula
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 34 (03) : 276 - 286
  • [39] Accuracy and precision of 3D cephalometric landmarks from biorthogonal plain film x-rays
    Dean, D
    Palomo, M
    Subramanyan, K
    Hans, MG
    Broadbent, BH
    Moullas, A
    Macaraeg, O
    IMAGE DISPLAY - MEDICAL IMAGING 1998, 1998, 3335 : 50 - 58
  • [40] Application of cone beam CT 3D images to cephalometric analysis
    Ogawa, Naoki
    Miyazaki, Yoshikazu
    Kubota, Masato
    Huang, John C.
    Miller, Arthur J.
    Maki, Koutaro
    ORTHODONTIC WAVES, 2010, 26 (04): : 415 - 454