A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis

被引:48
|
作者
Zamora, Natalia
Llamas, Jose-Maria [1 ]
Cibrian, Rosa [2 ]
Gandia, Jose-Luis [1 ]
Paredes, Vanessa
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Orthodont, Postgrad Orthodont Masters Course, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Physiol, Valencia, Spain
来源
关键词
Cone Beam Computed Tomography; cephalometry; landmark; orthodontics; reliability; LINEAR ACCURACY; BEAM; IDENTIFICATION; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.4317/medoral.17721
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) allows the possibility of modifying some of the diagnostic tools used in orthodontics, such as cephalometry. The first step must be to study the characteristics of these devices in terms of accuracy and reliability of the most commonly used landmarks. The aims were 1- To assess intra and inter-observer reliability in the location of anatomical landmarks belonging to hard tissues of the skull in images taken with a CBCT device, 2- To determine which of those landmarks are more vs. less reliable and 3- To introduce planes of reference so as to create cephalometric analyses appropriated to the 3D reality. Study design: Fifteen patients who had a CBCT (i-CAT (R)) as a diagnostic register were selected. To assess the reproducibility on landmark location and the differences in the measurements of two observers at different times, 41 landmarks were defined on the three spatial axes (X,Y,Z) and located. 3.690 measurements were taken and, as each determination has 3 coordinates, 11.070 data were processed with SPSS (R) statistical package. To discover the reproducibility of the method on landmark location, an ANOVA was undertaken using two variation factors: time (t1, t2 and t3) and observer (Ob1 and Ob2) for each axis (X, Y and Z) and landmark. The order of the CBCT scans submitted to the observers (Ob1, Ob2) at t1, t2, and t3, were different and randomly allocated. Multiple comparisons were undertaken using the Bonferroni test. The intra- and inter-examiner ICC's were calculated. Results: Intra- and inter- examiner reliability was high, both being ICC >= 0.99, with the best frequency on axis Z. Conclusions: The most reliable landmarks were: Nasion, Sella, Basion, left Porion, point A, anterior nasal spine, Pogonion, Gnathion, Menton, frontozygomatic sutures, first lower molars and upper and lower incisors. Those with less reliability were the supraorbitals, right zygion and posterior nasal spine.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:E678 / E688
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of the maxilla: Analysis of new landmarks
    Han, Michael D.
    Momin, Mohmedvasim R.
    Munaretto, Alexander M.
    Hao, Shuai
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 156 (03) : 337 - 344
  • [2] Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
    Lisboa, Cinthia de Oliveira
    Masterson, Daniele
    Jardim da Motta, Andrea Fonseca
    Motta, Alexandre Trindade
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2015, 23 (02) : 112 - 119
  • [3] Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph
    Olszewski, R.
    Reychler, H.
    Cosnard, G.
    Denis, J. M.
    Vynckier, S.
    Zech, F.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (05) : 261 - 267
  • [4] Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses
    Olszewski, Raphael
    Tanesy, Olivier
    Cosnard, Guy
    Zech, Francis
    Reychler, Herve
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 38 (03) : 214 - 221
  • [5] Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking and Frankfort Horizontal Plane Construction: Reproducibility of Conventional and Novel Landmarks
    Dot, Gauthier
    Rafflenbeul, Frederic
    Kerbrat, Adeline
    Rouch, Philippe
    Gajny, Laurent
    Schouman, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22)
  • [6] Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: A meta analysis
    Trpkova, B
    Major, P
    Prasad, N
    Nebbe, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1997, 112 (02) : 165 - 170
  • [7] Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT
    Naji, Pegah
    Alsufyani, Noura A.
    Lagravere, Manuel O.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2014, 84 (05) : 762 - 772
  • [8] Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography
    R. Olszewski
    L. Frison
    M. Wisniewski
    J. M. Denis
    S. Vynckier
    G. Cosnard
    F. Zech
    H. Reychler
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2013, 17 : 285 - 292
  • [9] Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography
    Olszewski, R.
    Frison, L.
    Wisniewski, M.
    Denis, J. M.
    Vynckier, S.
    Cosnard, G.
    Zech, F.
    Reychler, H.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (01) : 285 - 292
  • [10] Reliability of Traditional Cephalometric Landmarks as Seen in Three-Dimensional Analysis in Maxillary Expansion Treatments
    Lagravere, Manuel O.
    Gordon, Jillian M.
    Guedes, Ines H.
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    Carey, Jason P.
    Heo, Giseon
    Major, Paul W.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2009, 79 (06) : 1047 - 1056