Supervision Typology in Computer Science Engineering Capstone Projects

被引:19
|
作者
Dominguez Perez, Cesar [1 ]
Jaime Elizondo, Arturo [1 ]
Garcia-Izquierdo, Francisco J. [1 ]
Olarte Larrea, Juan Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ La Rioja, Math & Comp Sci Dept, Logrono 26004, La Rioja, Spain
关键词
Capstone project; computer science engineering; supervision typology; EXPERIENCES; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01124.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Undergraduate students in computer science engineering undertake a capstone project that should integrate the specific knowledge and skills acquired during their studies. The advisor assigned to supervise the process undertakes a multifaceted commitment that varies among advisors. PURPOSE This study develops and validates an instrument, and then utilizes it to determine the different styles of supervision in computer science engineering capstone projects. DESIGN/METHOD A questionnaire was developed to survey capstone project advisors at a university during the past two years. A total of 109 surveys were successfully collected. A combination of multivariate statistical methods, such as factorial and cluster analysis, was employed. RESULTS This study distinguished seven main supervision factors: technology, arrangements, keep alive, execution, meetings, management, and reports. Then, six supervision styles were identified according to the advisor's varying degree of involvement in each factor: student alone, execution focused, global supervision, management focused, technological mentoring, and process focused. To further characterize these styles, we compared their applications focusing on the type of student, the grade obtained, the project duration, and the amount of time devoted by the advisor. CONCLUSION We have determined the main factors in capstone project supervision and characterized different styles of supervision according to these factors. These supervision styles can help advisors recognize ways to proceed in the supervision of capstone projects.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 697
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ambiguity and Uncertainty of Engineering Projects and Defining Goals in Engineering Capstone Courses
    Dubikovsky, Sergey
    2017 27TH EAEEIE ANNUAL CONFERENCE (EAEEIE), 2017,
  • [32] A survey of computer science capstone course literature
    Dugan, Robert, Jr.
    COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2011, 21 (03) : 201 - 267
  • [33] Science seminar: Science capstone research projects as a class in high school
    Schwebach, J. Reid
    AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 2008, 70 (08): : 488 - 497
  • [34] AC 2011-1211: SE CAPSTONE: INTEGRATING SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS TO ENGINEERING CAPSTONE PROJECTS: EXPERIENTIAL AND ACTIVE
    Corns, Steven
    Dagli, Cihan H.
    Guardiola, Ivan G.
    2011 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, 2011,
  • [35] Socially-relevant capstone design projects in power engineering
    O'Neill-Carrillo, E.
    Irizarry-Rivera, A. A.
    2006 IEEE/PES POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION. VOLS 1-5, 2006, : 671 - +
  • [36] Power engineering design projects: Capstone team projects versus topical design courses
    Bohmann, LJ
    Mork, BA
    Wiitanen, DO
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (01) : 152 - 156
  • [37] How Course Projects can Successfully Prepare Engineering Students for Capstone Design Projects
    El-Abd, Mohammed
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON2016), 2016, : 746 - 750
  • [38] Collaboration Support in an International Computer Science Capstone Course
    Adams, Robert
    Kleiner, Carsten
    SOCIAL COMPUTING AND SOCIAL MEDIA, SCSM 2016, 2016, 9742 : 313 - 323
  • [39] APPLICATION COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY IN THE ENGINEERING SUPERVISION
    Liu Lihong
    2011 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT (ICCTD 2011), VOL 3, 2012, : 393 - 397
  • [40] Using a systematic engineering design process to conduct undergraduate engineering management capstone projects
    Farr, John V.
    Lee, Marc A.
    Metro, Richard A.
    Sutton, James P.
    Journal of Engineering Education, 2001, 90 (02) : 193 - 197