Construction and case analysis of an index for the sustainability of ecosystem services

被引:12
|
作者
Chen, Huaxiang [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Lina [1 ]
Qiu, Quanyi [1 ]
Hou, Lipeng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Baosheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Urban Environm, Key Lab Urban Environm & Hlth, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
Sustainability index; Ecosystem services; Marine-terrestrial zone; Golden Triangle of Southern Fujian China; VULNERABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106370
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Natural resources are finite, and a sustainable land use structure and layout are important for promoting the sustainable development of ecosystem services. In this study, we constructed a sustainability index for ecosystem services using three indicators-namely the value, vulnerability, and spatial trade-offs of ecosystem services. Additionally, we attempted to investigate the factors which influence the sustainability of ecosystem services (ESS), as well as the effect of different calculation methods on the calculated sustainability. The "Golden Triangle of Southern Fujian"-a marine-terrestrial zone urban agglomeration-was taken as a case study to investigate the ESS. Results showed that: (1) Factors of regional economic density, population density, and land use changes significantly influence the ESS, while the geographical location and urban infrastructure construction have little impact; (2) A method involving the multiplication and superposition of the positive and negative index was found to be reasonable for calculating the ESS; (3) In the research area, the ESS is generally high, with the sustainability indices of most counties reaching 0.3-0.5 (ordinary quality) and above. During the study periods (2005-2010 and 2010-2015), the sustainability indices of cultivated land, forest land, water area, and grassland decreased by 5.61, 5.90, 2.62, and 7.35%, respectively, while the sustainability indices of construction land and unused land increased by 4.85%, 32.10%, respectively. The number of counties whose ESS was classified as weak (0-0.1) or relatively weak (0.1-0.3) decreased to zero during the study periods. This research provides a method for the quantitative evaluation of the ESS and has theoretical and practical significance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Towards ecological, socioeconomic and cultural sustainability of marine ecosystem services
    Nishijima, Shota
    Belgrano, Andrea
    POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2021, 63 (01) : 14 - 16
  • [42] A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services
    Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
    Polasky, Stephen
    King, Elizabeth
    Balvanera, Patricia
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [43] Sustainability threshold for multiple ecosystem services in the Venice lagoon, Italy
    Rova, Silvia
    Stocco, Alice
    Pranovi, Fabio
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 64
  • [44] Ecosystem services in environmental sustainability: a formalized approach using UML
    Khaiter, P. A.
    Erechtchoukova, M. G.
    20TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2013), 2013, : 1805 - 1811
  • [45] Introduction to Special Issue on Modeling and sustainability of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Doyen, Luc
    NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2017, 30 (01) : 5 - 9
  • [46] Sustainability of Lakes and Reservoirs: Multiple Perspectives Based on Ecosystem Services
    Ho, Long
    Goethals, Peter
    WATER, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [47] Analysis of Spatial Relationship Based on Ecosystem Services and Ecological Risk Index in the Counties of Chongqing
    Li, Zihui
    Zhu, Kangwen
    Song, Dan
    Guan, Dongjie
    Cao, Jiameng
    Su, Xiangyuan
    Zhang, Yanjun
    Zhang, Ya
    Ba, Yong
    Wang, Haoyu
    LAND, 2023, 12 (10)
  • [48] Spatial analysis of demand for sparsely located ecosystem services using alternative index approaches
    Granado-Diaz, Ruben
    Gomez-Limon, Jose A.
    Rodriguez-Entrena, Macario
    Villanueva, Anastasio J.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 47 (02) : 752 - 784
  • [49] The construction of green infrastructure network in the perspectives of ecosystem services and ecological sensitivity: The case of Harbin, China
    Bai, Yujing
    Guo, Rong
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 27
  • [50] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES VALUE: CASE OF POLLINATION
    Majewski, Janusz
    ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 49 : 41 - 47