Faculty Development for the Operating Room An Examination of the Effectiveness of an Intraoperative Teaching Course for Surgeons

被引:14
|
作者
Gardner, Aimee K. [1 ]
Timberlake, Matthew D. [2 ]
Dunkin, Brian J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Surg, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, MS BCM115,DeBakey Bldg,M108K,One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Urol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, Houston, TX USA
关键词
debriefing; faculty development; intraoperative teaching; operating room teaching; teaching; EDUCATION; PROGRAM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002468
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: We describe a half-day faculty development course designed to equip surgical educators with evidence-based teaching frameworks shown to promote learning in the operating room (OR). We hypothesize that participating faculty will deliver improved instruction as perceived by residents. Methods: Residents anonymously rated faculty teaching behaviors among whom they had recently worked in the OR (minimum 3 cases in preceding 6 months) using the Briefing - Intraoperative teaching - Debriefing Assessment Tool (BIDAT; 1 = never, 5 = always). Faculty then attended a half-day course. The curriculum was based on the "briefing-intraoperative teaching-debriefing" framework. Discussion and practice centered on goal setting, performance-enhancing instruction, dual task interference, and feedback. After the course, residents again evaluated the faculty. Paired-samples and independent-samples t tests were used to analyze pre and post course changes and differences between groups, respectively. Results: Nineteen faculty completed the course. Associate professors (N = 4) demonstrated improved briefing (4.32 +/- 0.48 -> 4.76 +/- 0.45, P < 0.01), debriefing (4.30 +/- 0.29 -> 4.77 +/- 0.43, P < 0.01), and total teaching (4.38 +/- 0.78 -> 4.79 +/- 0.39, P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed among assistant (N = 9) or full professors (N = 6). All 3 faculty members who served as course co-instructors, regardless of rank, improved significantly in briefing (4.42 +/- 0.22 -> 4.98 +/- 0.29, P < 0.05), debriefing (4.27 +/- 0.23 -> 4.98 +/- 0.29, P < 0.04), and total teaching (4.37 +/- 0.21 -> 4.99 +/- 0.02, P < 0.05). Faculty with baseline teaching scores in the bottom quartile improved teaching behaviors in all phases of instruction (P < 0.05). Teaching scores over the same period did not change among faculty who did not attend. Conclusions: A half-day course aimed at enhancing intraoperative instruction can contribute to resident-perceived improvement in structured teaching behavior among participating faculty. Initiatives directed at intraoperative instruction might be best targeted towards midlevel faculty with established technical expertise who are motivated to expand teaching efforts and those who have low levels of baseline teaching scores.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 190
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Teaching the Medical Interview: Methods and Key Learning Issues in a Faculty Development Course
    David S. Hatem
    Susan V. Barrett
    Mariana Hewson
    David Steele
    Urip Purwono
    Robert Smith
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2007, 22 : 1718 - 1724
  • [32] HISTORY AND PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION BY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS - THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT COURSE
    KEEN, R
    FILARDO, T
    COLGAN, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 110 (01): : 64 - 66
  • [33] PLATFORM FOR OPERATING ROOM TEACHING AND LEARNING (PORTAL): DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW EDUCATIONAL PARADIGM
    Wanderer, J. P.
    Baker, K. H.
    Forman, S. A.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 114
  • [34] Faculty Online Teaching Effectiveness Scale (FOTES): Instrument development and content validation
    Chen, Yea-Jyh
    Smith, Yvonne M.
    Stidham, Andrea Warner
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2024, 106
  • [35] Instructional technology and faculty development: How iWRITE challenges course design and teaching methods
    Procter, Margaret
    [J]. UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES, PT 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 756 - 765
  • [36] Rethinking Teaching in Higher Education: From a Course Design Workshop to a Faculty Development Framework
    Simmons, Laura K.
    [J]. TEACHING THEOLOGY AND RELIGION, 2006, 9 (04): : 243 - 245
  • [37] TEACHING AND LEARNING ROUNDS: DESIGNING A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT COURSE USING ELEMENTS OF THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
    McShane, Michael
    Torres, Hugo
    Jain, Priyank
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 : S709 - S710
  • [38] TEACHING IS LEARNING: EXPLORING FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF FIRST-TIME ONLINE COURSE DEVELOPMENT
    Plews, R.
    Bonvin, M.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 6488 - 6494
  • [40] Assessing the effectiveness of a faculty instructional development programme, part 2: Teaching and learning styles
    Mourtos, NJ
    Allen, EL
    [J]. 6TH UICEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON ENINEERING EDUCATION, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: EDUCATING FOR THE RIGHT ENVIRONMENT, 2003, : 243 - 247