Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements

被引:16
|
作者
Zalud, Ivica [1 ]
Good, Sara [2 ]
Carneiro, Gustavo [3 ]
Georgescu, Bogdan [3 ]
Aoki, Kathleen [4 ]
Green, Lorry [4 ]
Shahrestani, Farzaneh [4 ]
Okumura, Russell [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept OB GYN & Womens Hlth, Fetal Diagnost Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96826 USA
[2] Siemens Med Solut, Ultrasound Div, Mountain View, CA USA
[3] Siemens Inc, Siemens Corp Res, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Kapiolani Med Ctr Women & Children, Fetal Diagnost Ctr, Honolulu, HI USA
来源
关键词
Fetal biometry; ultrasound; computer measurements; ULTRASOUND IMAGES; HEAD MEASUREMENTS;
D O I
10.1080/14767050802415736
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. We compared the performance between sonographers and automated fetal biometry measurements (Auto OB) with respect to the following measurements: biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). Methods. The first set of experiments involved assessing the performance of Auto OB relative to the five sonographers, using 240 images for each user. Each sonographer made measurements in 80 images per anatomy. The second set of experiments compared the performance of Auto OB with respect to the data generated by the five sonographers for inter-observer variability (i.e., sonographers and clinicians) using a set of 10 images per anatomy. Results. Auto OB correlated well with manual measurements for BPD, HC, AC and FL (r0.98, p0.001 for all measurements). The errors produced by Auto OB for BPD is 1.46% (=1.74%), where denotes standard deviation), for HC is 1.25% (=1.34%), for AC is 3% (=6.16%) and for FL is 3.52% (=3.72%). In general, these errors represent deviations of less than 3 days for fetuses younger than 30 weeks, and less than 7 days for fetuses between 30 and 40 weeks of age. Conclusion. The measurements produced by Auto OB are comparable to the measurements done by sonographers.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automated 3D Ultrasound Biometry Planes Extraction for First Trimester Fetal Assessment
    Ryou, Hosuk
    Yaqub, Mohammad
    Cavallaro, Angelo
    Roseman, Fenella
    Papageorghiou, Aris
    Noble, J. Alison
    MACHINE LEARNING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, MLMI 2016, 2016, 10019 : 196 - 204
  • [42] Comparison of ocular biometry measurements by applanation and immersion A-scan techniques
    Ademola-Popoola, Dupe S.
    Nzeh, Donald A.
    Saka, Sadiat E.
    Olokoba, Lateefat B.
    Obajolowo, Tokunbo S.
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 27 (3-4): : 110 - 114
  • [43] Comparison of optical biometry and applanation ultrasound measurements of the axial length of the eye
    Nakhli, Fouad R.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 28 (04) : 287 - 291
  • [44] Comparison of the ocular ultrasonic and optical biometry devices in the different quality measurements
    Khorrami-Nejad, Masoud
    Khodair, Ahmed Mohammed
    Khodaparast, Mehdi
    Mofrad, Farshid Babapour
    Nasrabadi, Farzaneh Dehghanian
    JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY, 2023, 16 (04) : 284 - 295
  • [45] Comparison of sonographic triplet fetal growth measurements between Japanese and American populations
    Masashi Akiyama
    Atsushi Kuno
    Masazi Utsu
    Toshiyuki Hata
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2003, 30 (3) : 171 - 175
  • [46] Discrepancy in fetal head biometry between ultrasound and MRI in suspected microcephalic fetuses
    Yaniv, Gal
    Katorza, Eldad
    Abitbol, Vered Tsehmaister
    Eisenkraft, Arik
    Bercovitz, Ronen
    Bader, Salim
    Hoffmann, Chen
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (12) : 1519 - 1527
  • [47] Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population
    Dubiel, Mariusz
    Krajewski, Maciej
    Pietryga, Marek
    Tretyn, Andrzej
    Breborowicz, Grzegorz
    Lindquist, Pelle
    Gudmundsson, Saemundur
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2008, 79 (11) : 746 - 753
  • [48] Direct estimation of fetal biometry measurements from ultrasound video scans through deep learning
    Plotka, Szymon
    Pustelnik, Karol
    Szenejko, Paula
    Zebrowska, Kinga
    Rzucidlo-Szymanska, Iga
    Szymecka-Samaha, Natalia
    Legowik, Tomasz
    Kosinska-Kaczynska, Katarzyna
    Korzeniowski, Przemyslaw
    Bilinski, Piotr
    Khalil, Asma
    Brawura-Biskupski-Samaha, Robert
    Isgum, Ivana
    Sanchez, Clara. I.
    Sitek, Arkadiusz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 7 (04)
  • [49] Fetal Biometry Assessment of Biparietal Diameter for Saudi Arabia Population and Comparison with Other Countries
    A-Marri, Hana Mohammed
    Ramli, Ramzun Maizan
    Al-sahlanee, Mayyadah Hasan Rhaif
    Azman, Nurul Zahirah Noor
    Rahman, Azhar Abdul
    Mustafa, Iskandar Shahrim
    Razak, Nik Noor Ashikin Nik Abdul
    Ayob, Nur Syuhada
    Zakaria, Nabela
    Al-Marri, Hana Mohammed
    Yahaya, Nor Zakiah
    2016 6TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL SYSTEM, COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (ICCSCE), 2016, : 366 - 369
  • [50] Fetal biometry in the Korean population: reference charts and comparison with charts from other populations
    Kwon, Ji Young
    Park, In Yang
    Wie, Jeoung Ha
    Choe, Suyearn
    Kim, Chan Joo
    Shin, Jong Chul
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 34 (10) : 927 - 934