Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements

被引:16
|
作者
Zalud, Ivica [1 ]
Good, Sara [2 ]
Carneiro, Gustavo [3 ]
Georgescu, Bogdan [3 ]
Aoki, Kathleen [4 ]
Green, Lorry [4 ]
Shahrestani, Farzaneh [4 ]
Okumura, Russell [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept OB GYN & Womens Hlth, Fetal Diagnost Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96826 USA
[2] Siemens Med Solut, Ultrasound Div, Mountain View, CA USA
[3] Siemens Inc, Siemens Corp Res, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Kapiolani Med Ctr Women & Children, Fetal Diagnost Ctr, Honolulu, HI USA
来源
关键词
Fetal biometry; ultrasound; computer measurements; ULTRASOUND IMAGES; HEAD MEASUREMENTS;
D O I
10.1080/14767050802415736
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. We compared the performance between sonographers and automated fetal biometry measurements (Auto OB) with respect to the following measurements: biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). Methods. The first set of experiments involved assessing the performance of Auto OB relative to the five sonographers, using 240 images for each user. Each sonographer made measurements in 80 images per anatomy. The second set of experiments compared the performance of Auto OB with respect to the data generated by the five sonographers for inter-observer variability (i.e., sonographers and clinicians) using a set of 10 images per anatomy. Results. Auto OB correlated well with manual measurements for BPD, HC, AC and FL (r0.98, p0.001 for all measurements). The errors produced by Auto OB for BPD is 1.46% (=1.74%), where denotes standard deviation), for HC is 1.25% (=1.34%), for AC is 3% (=6.16%) and for FL is 3.52% (=3.72%). In general, these errors represent deviations of less than 3 days for fetuses younger than 30 weeks, and less than 7 days for fetuses between 30 and 40 weeks of age. Conclusion. The measurements produced by Auto OB are comparable to the measurements done by sonographers.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry in Lithuania and their comparison with international charts
    Zaliunas, Bronius
    Jakaite, Vaidile
    Bartkeviciene, Daiva
    Ramasauskaite, Diana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 293 : 224 - 225
  • [32] Fetal Biometry Studies of Malaysian Pregnant Women and Comparison with International Charts
    Adam, N.
    Ramli, R. M.
    Jaafar, M. S.
    PROGRESS OF PHYSICS RESEARCH IN MALAYSIA, PERFIK2009, 2010, 1250 : 393 - 396
  • [33] Fetal biometry measurements can predict neonatal hypoglycemia in women with diabetic mellitus
    Heo, A.
    Lee, S.
    Kwon, S.
    Park, Y.
    Lee, J.
    Lee, Y.
    Chung, J.
    Cho, H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 249 - 250
  • [34] Accuracy of automated three-dimensional ultrasound imaging technique for fetal head biometry
    Pluym, I. D.
    Afshar, Y.
    Holliman, K.
    Kwan, L.
    Bolagani, A.
    Mok, T.
    Silver, B.
    Ramirez, E.
    Han, C. S.
    Platt, L. D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 57 (05) : 798 - 803
  • [35] Common fetal measurements: A comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging
    Parkar, Anagha P.
    Olsen, Oystein E.
    Gjelland, Knut
    Kiserud, Torvid
    Rosendahl, Karen
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [36] COMPARISON BETWEEN PLASMA AND URINARY ESTROGEN MEASUREMENTS IN PREDICTING FETAL RISK
    AICKIN, DR
    SMITH, MA
    BROWN, JB
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1974, 14 (02): : 59 - 76
  • [37] Automated, Objective Measurements of Colonoscopy Technique: A Comparison Between Trainees and Staff
    de Groen, Piet C.
    Srinivasan, Nandakumar
    Stanek, Sean
    Szewczynski, Michael J.
    Enders, Felicity
    Tavanapong, Wallapak
    Oh, JungHwan
    Wong, Johnny
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 144 (05) : S15 - S15
  • [38] EVALUATION OF FETAL SPINE BIOMETRY BETWEEN 11 AND 14 WEEKS OF GESTATION
    Cheng, Po-Jen
    Huang, Shang-Yu
    Shaw, Sheng-Wen
    Chueh, Ho-Yen
    Soong, Yung-Kuei
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 36 (07): : 1060 - 1065
  • [39] Comparison of biometry measurements and intraocular lens power prediction between 2 SS-OCT-based biometers
    Sorkin, Nir
    Zadok, Tal
    Barrett, Graham D.
    Chasid, Otzem
    Abulafia, Adi
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 49 (05): : 460 - 466
  • [40] Chinese fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with charts from other populations
    Zhang, Yixiu
    Meng, Hua
    Jiang, Yuxin
    Xu, Zhonghui
    Ouyang, Yunshu
    Li, Shengli
    Chen, Qian
    Wu, Qingqing
    Li, Rui
    Ru, Tong
    Cai, Aailu
    Chen, Xinlin
    Yang, Taizhu
    Chen, Ping
    Xie, Hongning
    Lu, Hong
    Dai, Qing
    Dong, Fen
    Yang, Meng
    Yang, Xiao
    Lu, Jia
    Tian, Jiawei
    Sun, Kun
    Li, Hui
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (09): : 1507 - 1515