Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements

被引:16
|
作者
Zalud, Ivica [1 ]
Good, Sara [2 ]
Carneiro, Gustavo [3 ]
Georgescu, Bogdan [3 ]
Aoki, Kathleen [4 ]
Green, Lorry [4 ]
Shahrestani, Farzaneh [4 ]
Okumura, Russell [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept OB GYN & Womens Hlth, Fetal Diagnost Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96826 USA
[2] Siemens Med Solut, Ultrasound Div, Mountain View, CA USA
[3] Siemens Inc, Siemens Corp Res, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Kapiolani Med Ctr Women & Children, Fetal Diagnost Ctr, Honolulu, HI USA
来源
关键词
Fetal biometry; ultrasound; computer measurements; ULTRASOUND IMAGES; HEAD MEASUREMENTS;
D O I
10.1080/14767050802415736
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. We compared the performance between sonographers and automated fetal biometry measurements (Auto OB) with respect to the following measurements: biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). Methods. The first set of experiments involved assessing the performance of Auto OB relative to the five sonographers, using 240 images for each user. Each sonographer made measurements in 80 images per anatomy. The second set of experiments compared the performance of Auto OB with respect to the data generated by the five sonographers for inter-observer variability (i.e., sonographers and clinicians) using a set of 10 images per anatomy. Results. Auto OB correlated well with manual measurements for BPD, HC, AC and FL (r0.98, p0.001 for all measurements). The errors produced by Auto OB for BPD is 1.46% (=1.74%), where denotes standard deviation), for HC is 1.25% (=1.34%), for AC is 3% (=6.16%) and for FL is 3.52% (=3.72%). In general, these errors represent deviations of less than 3 days for fetuses younger than 30 weeks, and less than 7 days for fetuses between 30 and 40 weeks of age. Conclusion. The measurements produced by Auto OB are comparable to the measurements done by sonographers.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of Sonographic Fetal Biometry Measurements
    Mansour, Trina
    Oshiro, Bryan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 : 113S - 113S
  • [2] A pragmatic comparison of fetal biometry curves
    Dhombres, Ferdinand
    Massoud, Mona
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2023, 51 (11-12): : 524 - 530
  • [3] Artificial intelligence assistance for fetal development: evaluation of an automated software for biometry measurements in the mid-trimester
    Han, Xuesong
    Yu, Junxuan
    Yang, Xin
    Chen, Chaoyu
    Zhou, Han
    Qiu, Chuangxin
    Cao, Yan
    Zhang, Tianjing
    Peng, Meiran
    Zhu, Guiyao
    Ni, Dong
    Zhang, Yuanji
    Liu, Nana
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [4] Fetal biometry: A comparison of family physicians and radiologists
    Keith, R
    Frisch, L
    FAMILY MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (02) : 111 - 114
  • [5] Correlation between fetal cardiac diagnosis by obstetric and pediatric cardiologist sonographers and comparison with postnatal findings
    Meyer-Wittkopf, M
    Cooper, S
    Sholler, G
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 17 (05) : 392 - 397
  • [6] Standardization of fetal ultrasound biometry measurements: improving the quality and consistency of measurements
    Sarris, I.
    Ioannou, C.
    Dighe, M.
    Mitidieri, A.
    Oberto, M.
    Qingqing, W.
    Shah, J.
    Sohoni, S.
    Al Zidjali, W.
    Hoch, L.
    Altman, D. G.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 38 (06) : 681 - 687
  • [7] Scanning for chorionicity: comparison between sonographers and perinatologists
    Weisz, B
    Pandya, P
    Dave, R
    Jauniaux, E
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (09) : 835 - 838
  • [8] Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry
    Salim, I.
    Cavallaro, A.
    Ciofolo-Veit, C.
    Rouet, L.
    Raynaud, C.
    Mory, B.
    Billon, A. Collet
    Harrison, G.
    Roundhill, D.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 54 (05) : 650 - 654
  • [9] Fetal biometry measurements in diabetic pregnant women and neonatal outcomes
    Heo, Aram
    Chung, Jinha
    Lee, Seula
    Cho, Hyunjin
    OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE, 2025, 68 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [10] Automated region mask for four-chamber fetal heart biometry
    S. Vijayalakshmi
    N. Sriraam
    S. Suresh
    S. Muttan
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2013, 27 : 205 - 209