Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting Without Distal Embolic Protection Devices

被引:11
|
作者
Binning, Mandy J. [1 ]
Maxwell, Christina R. [1 ]
Stofko, Douglas [2 ]
Zerr, Myra [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Maghazehe, Kamyar [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Liebman, Kenneth [1 ]
Hakma, Zakaria [1 ]
Lewis-Diaz, Cynthia [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Veznedaroglu, Erol [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Neurosci Inst, 219 Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Tennova Neurosci, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Capital Hlth Reg Med Ctr, Trenton, NJ USA
[4] Capital Inst Neurosci, Trenton, NJ USA
[5] Capital Hlth Reg Med Ctr, Pennington, NJ USA
[6] Capital Inst Neurosci, Pennington, NJ USA
关键词
Angioplasty; Carotid artery; Embolic protection device; Stenting; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ENDARTERECTOMY; STENOSIS; FILTER;
D O I
10.1227/NEU.0000000000001367
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Embolic protection devices are used during carotid artery stenting procedures to reduce risk of distal embolization. Although this is a standard procedural recommendation, no studies have shown superiority of these devices over unprotected stenting procedures. OBJECTIVE: To assess the periprocedural outcomeand durability of carotid artery stenting without embolic protection devices and poststent angioplasty. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 174 carotid angioplasty stent procedures performed at our institution. One hundred sixty-six patients underwent angioplasty and stenting without distal protection devices or poststent angioplasty. Complications related to stenting, including procedural complications, postoperative stroke and/or myocardial infarction, and stent restenosis were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five stents (78%) were performed in symptomatic patients, whereas 22% of stents were placed for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. The degree of stenosis was 80% or greater in 75% of patients and 90% or greater in 55% of patients. Following the stenting procedure, the 24-hour and 30-day rate of transient ischemic attack, intracranial hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke was 0. Three (2%) patients had a perioperative, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Five patients (2.8%) required treatment for restenosis (> 50% stenosis from baseline), 1 of which was symptomatic. CONCLUSION: Our data show that carotid artery stenting without the use of embolic protection devices and without postangioplasty stenting, in experienced hands, can be performed safely. Furthermore, this technique does not result in a higher degree of in-stent restenosis than series in which poststenting angioplasty is performed.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 64
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contemporary Review of Embolic Distal Protection Strategies in Carotid Artery Stenting
    Lam, Russell C.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 21 (08): : 413 - 414
  • [22] Safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection in octogenarians
    Clavijo, LC
    Satler, LF
    Nanjundappa, A
    Ahmed, HM
    Bersnahan, T
    Whitman, DJ
    Waksman, R
    Laird, JR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (04) : 34B - 34B
  • [23] Embolic protection devices during carotid artery stenting: Is there a difference between proximal occlusion and distal filter?
    Gargiulo, Giuseppe
    Stabile, Eugenio
    Sannino, Anna
    Perrino, Cinzia
    Trimarco, Bruno
    Esposito, Giovanni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 187 : 592 - 593
  • [24] Retinal artery occlusion during carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection device
    Kohara, Kotaro
    Ishikawa, Tatsuya
    Kobayashi, Tomonori
    Kawamata, Takakazu
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 31 (05): : 504 - 508
  • [25] Embolic Protection Devices in Carotid Stenting: To Go Proximal or To Go Distal, That Is the Question
    Sousa, Jose
    Puga, Luis
    Paiva, Luis
    Silva, Joana
    Costa, Marco
    Goncalves, Lino
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B158 - B159
  • [26] Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience
    Yosuke Kajihara
    Shigeyuki Sakamoto
    Yoshihiro Kiura
    Kazutoshi Mukada
    Takahiro Chaki
    Shiro Kajihara
    Kaoru Kurisu
    Neurosurgical Review, 2015, 38 : 671 - 676
  • [27] Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience
    Kajihara, Yosuke
    Sakamoto, Shigeyuki
    Kiura, Yoshihiro
    Mukada, Kazutoshi
    Chaki, Takahiro
    Kajihara, Shiro
    Kurisu, Kaoru
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 38 (04) : 671 - 676
  • [28] Long-term outcome of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection
    Andersen, G.
    Azzari, F.
    Luduena, S.
    Chambre, D.
    Schipani, G.
    Fernandez, A.
    Brieva, S.
    Torresani, E.
    Bertoni, H.
    Leguizamon, J.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (12) : E327 - E328
  • [29] Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: Preliminary experience in 100 cases
    Maynar, M.
    Baldi, S.
    Rostagno, R.
    Zander, T.
    Rabellino, M.
    Llorens, R.
    Alvarez, J.
    Barajas, F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2007, 28 (07) : 1378 - 1383
  • [30] Distal embolic protection devices, high intensity transient signals and neurological outcomes during carotid artery stenting
    Gruberg, L.
    Nair, P.
    Kerner, A.
    Petchersky, S.
    Kouperberg, E.
    Kabaha, M.
    Beyar, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 233 - 233