Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting Without Distal Embolic Protection Devices

被引:11
|
作者
Binning, Mandy J. [1 ]
Maxwell, Christina R. [1 ]
Stofko, Douglas [2 ]
Zerr, Myra [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Maghazehe, Kamyar [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Liebman, Kenneth [1 ]
Hakma, Zakaria [1 ]
Lewis-Diaz, Cynthia [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Veznedaroglu, Erol [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Neurosci Inst, 219 Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Tennova Neurosci, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Capital Hlth Reg Med Ctr, Trenton, NJ USA
[4] Capital Inst Neurosci, Trenton, NJ USA
[5] Capital Hlth Reg Med Ctr, Pennington, NJ USA
[6] Capital Inst Neurosci, Pennington, NJ USA
关键词
Angioplasty; Carotid artery; Embolic protection device; Stenting; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ENDARTERECTOMY; STENOSIS; FILTER;
D O I
10.1227/NEU.0000000000001367
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Embolic protection devices are used during carotid artery stenting procedures to reduce risk of distal embolization. Although this is a standard procedural recommendation, no studies have shown superiority of these devices over unprotected stenting procedures. OBJECTIVE: To assess the periprocedural outcomeand durability of carotid artery stenting without embolic protection devices and poststent angioplasty. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 174 carotid angioplasty stent procedures performed at our institution. One hundred sixty-six patients underwent angioplasty and stenting without distal protection devices or poststent angioplasty. Complications related to stenting, including procedural complications, postoperative stroke and/or myocardial infarction, and stent restenosis were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five stents (78%) were performed in symptomatic patients, whereas 22% of stents were placed for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. The degree of stenosis was 80% or greater in 75% of patients and 90% or greater in 55% of patients. Following the stenting procedure, the 24-hour and 30-day rate of transient ischemic attack, intracranial hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke was 0. Three (2%) patients had a perioperative, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Five patients (2.8%) required treatment for restenosis (> 50% stenosis from baseline), 1 of which was symptomatic. CONCLUSION: Our data show that carotid artery stenting without the use of embolic protection devices and without postangioplasty stenting, in experienced hands, can be performed safely. Furthermore, this technique does not result in a higher degree of in-stent restenosis than series in which poststenting angioplasty is performed.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 64
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting Without Distal Embolic Protection Devices
    Pelz, David M.
    Lownie, Stephen P.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (06) : E273 - E273
  • [2] In Reply: Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting Without Distal Embolic Protection Devices
    Binning, Mandy J.
    Veznedaroglu, Erol
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (06) : E274 - E274
  • [3] Letter: Commentary: Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting Without Distal Embolic Protection Devices
    Binning, Mandy J.
    Veznedaroglu, Erol
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 81 (03)
  • [4] Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection?
    Zahn, R
    Mark, B
    Niedermaier, N
    Zeymer, U
    Limbourg, P
    Ischinger, T
    Haerten, K
    Hauptmann, KE
    von Leitner, ER
    Kasper, W
    Tebbe, U
    Senges, J
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (17) : 1550 - 1558
  • [5] Elective carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection
    Durmaz, Hasanali
    Ergun, Onur
    Birgi, Erdem
    Dayanir, Hakan
    Conkbayir, Isik
    Hekimoglu, Saki
    NEUROLOGY ASIA, 2020, 25 (03) : 253 - 262
  • [6] Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Without Protection Devices
    Mansour, O. Y.
    Weber, J.
    Niesen, W.
    Schumacher, M.
    Berlis, A.
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) : 65 - 73
  • [7] Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices?
    Zahn, R
    Mark, B
    Zeymer, U
    Niedermaier, N
    Von Leitner, E
    Ischinger, T
    Senges, J
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 204 - 204
  • [8] Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting - Is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices?
    Zahn, R
    Ischinger, T
    Mark, B
    Gass, S
    Zeymer, U
    Schmalz, W
    Haerten, K
    Hauptmann, KE
    von Leitner, ER
    Kasper, W
    Tebbe, U
    Senges, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (11) : 1769 - 1774
  • [9] Distal embolic protection during renal artery angioplasty and stenting
    Edwards, Matthew S.
    Craven, Brandon L.
    Stafford, Jeanette
    Craven, Timothy E.
    Sauve, Kenneth J.
    Ayerdi, Juan
    Geary, Randolph L.
    Hansen, Kimberley J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 44 (01) : 128 - 135
  • [10] Distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection?
    Zahn, R
    Mark, B
    Siegler, KE
    Limbourg, P
    Von Leitner, ER
    Reinhard, U
    Ischingers, T
    Senges, J
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 654 - 654