Anterior versus posterior leaflet mitral valve repair: A propensity-matched analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Brescia, Alexander A. [1 ]
Watt, Tessa M. F. [1 ]
Rosenbloom, Liza M. [1 ]
Murray, Shannon L. [1 ]
Wu, Xiaoting [1 ]
Romano, Matthew A. [1 ]
Bolling, Steven F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Cardiac Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
关键词
mitral valve; mitral repair; degenerative mitral repair; mitral replacement; anterior leaflet; bileaflet; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE SUTURES; PROLAPSE; OUTCOMES; REGURGITATION; DURABILITY; DISEASE; SURGERY; REPLACEMENT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.148
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Mitral valve repair is superior to replacement for degenerative disease, but long-term outcomes of anterior versus posterior leaflet repair remain poorly defined. We propensity matched anterior and posterior repairs to compare long-term outcomes. Methods: Patients undergoing first-time degenerative mitral repair between 1992 and 2018 were identified. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were postprocedural residual mitral regurgitation and reoperation. From 1025 patients, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed, yielding 309 anterior (isolated anterior = 85, bileaflet = 224) and 309 isolated posterior repairs. Results: Age was 58 +/- 15 years, ejection fraction was 57% +/- 10%, and matched groups were well balanced. Anterior repairs had longer bypass (122 +/- 53 vs 109 +/- 43 minutes, P = .001) and crossclamp (94 +/- 44 vs 85 +/- 62 minutes, P = .033) times. Mean residual mitral regurgitation grade was 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.65) for anterior repair and 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.47) for posterior repair (P = .31). Overall, 92%(569/618) of matched patients had no residual mitral regurgitation, with no differences in mitral regurgitation grade between groups (P = .77). Survival did not differ between anterior (10 years: 72% +/- 7%; 15 years: 63% +/- 7%) and posterior (10 years: 74% +/- 7%; 15 years: 60% +/- 8%) groups (log-rank P = .93). Linearized incidence of reoperation was 0.62% per patient-year, including 0.74% for anterior and 0.48% for posterior repairs. Cumulative incidence of reoperation at 15 years was 7.5% after anterior repair and 4.9% after posterior repair (Gray's test P = .26). Conclusions: No long-term survival or reoperation difference was found between posterior and anterior repair. On the basis of these findings, surgeons at centers of excellence should aim for repair of both anterior and posterior leaflet pathology with the same decision-making threshold over valve replacement for degenerative mitral disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1095
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SURGICAL REPAIR OF RHEUMATIC MITRAL-VALVE LESIONS BY TRANSFER OF A SEGMENT OF THE POSTERIOR LEAFLET WITH ITS CHORDAE TO THE ANTERIOR LEAFLET
    HVASS, U
    PANSARD, Y
    LAMBERTI, A
    MOUHANNA, G
    TOUCHE, T
    LANGLOIS, J
    ARCHIVES DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DES VAISSEAUX, 1986, 79 (01): : 103 - 106
  • [42] Haircut mitral valve repair: posterior leaflet-plasty
    Chitwood, W. Randolph, Jr.
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 4 (04) : 387 - 392
  • [43] Robotic mitral valve repair for anterior leaflet and bileaflet prolapse
    Rodriguez, Evelio
    Nifong, L. Wiley
    Chu, Michael W. A.
    Wood, William
    Vos, Paul W.
    Chitwood, W. Randolph
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 85 (02): : 438 - 444
  • [44] Minimally invasive mitral valve repair for anterior leaflet prolapse
    Pfannmueller, Bettina
    Seeburger, Joerg
    Misfeld, Martin
    Borger, Michael Andrew
    Garbade, Jens
    Mohr, Friedrich W.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 146 (01): : 109 - 113
  • [45] Allograft Versus Autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
    Ouro-Rodrigues, Evelyn
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Williams, Omar Ramos
    Derman, Peter B.
    Yasmeh, Siamak
    Cheng, Wayne K.
    Danisa, Olumide
    Liu, Joseph N.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [46] Right Minithoracotomy Versus Full Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Repair: A Propensity Matched Comparison
    Lange, Ruediger
    Voss, Bernhard
    Kehl, Victoria
    Mazzitelli, Domenico
    Tassani-Prell, Peter
    Guenther, Thomas
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 103 (02): : 573 - 579
  • [47] History of mitral valve anterior leaflet repair with triangular resection
    Grossi, EA
    LaPietra, A
    Galloway, AC
    Colvin, SB
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (05): : 1794 - 1795
  • [48] Mitral valve repair for mitral posterior leaflet prolpase in consecutive 57 patients
    Wang, Shuiyun
    Zhang, Shiju
    Sun, Hongtao
    Yin, Zhaohua
    Chen, Liyu
    Li, Haojie
    Song, Min
    Luo, Guohua
    CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 120 : 109 - 109
  • [49] Safety and durability of mitral valve repair for anterior leaflet perforation
    Sareyyupoglu, Basar
    Schaff, Hartzell V.
    Suri, Rakesh M.
    Connolly, Heidi M.
    Daly, Richard C.
    Orszulak, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 139 (06): : 1488 - 1493
  • [50] Posterior leaflet preservation in mitral valve prolapse: A new approach to mitral repair
    Dreyfus, Gilles D.
    Corbi, Pierre
    Rubin, Sylvain
    Aubert, Stephane
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2006, 15 (04): : 528 - 530