Anterior versus posterior leaflet mitral valve repair: A propensity-matched analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Brescia, Alexander A. [1 ]
Watt, Tessa M. F. [1 ]
Rosenbloom, Liza M. [1 ]
Murray, Shannon L. [1 ]
Wu, Xiaoting [1 ]
Romano, Matthew A. [1 ]
Bolling, Steven F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Cardiac Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
关键词
mitral valve; mitral repair; degenerative mitral repair; mitral replacement; anterior leaflet; bileaflet; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE SUTURES; PROLAPSE; OUTCOMES; REGURGITATION; DURABILITY; DISEASE; SURGERY; REPLACEMENT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.148
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Mitral valve repair is superior to replacement for degenerative disease, but long-term outcomes of anterior versus posterior leaflet repair remain poorly defined. We propensity matched anterior and posterior repairs to compare long-term outcomes. Methods: Patients undergoing first-time degenerative mitral repair between 1992 and 2018 were identified. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were postprocedural residual mitral regurgitation and reoperation. From 1025 patients, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed, yielding 309 anterior (isolated anterior = 85, bileaflet = 224) and 309 isolated posterior repairs. Results: Age was 58 +/- 15 years, ejection fraction was 57% +/- 10%, and matched groups were well balanced. Anterior repairs had longer bypass (122 +/- 53 vs 109 +/- 43 minutes, P = .001) and crossclamp (94 +/- 44 vs 85 +/- 62 minutes, P = .033) times. Mean residual mitral regurgitation grade was 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.65) for anterior repair and 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.47) for posterior repair (P = .31). Overall, 92%(569/618) of matched patients had no residual mitral regurgitation, with no differences in mitral regurgitation grade between groups (P = .77). Survival did not differ between anterior (10 years: 72% +/- 7%; 15 years: 63% +/- 7%) and posterior (10 years: 74% +/- 7%; 15 years: 60% +/- 8%) groups (log-rank P = .93). Linearized incidence of reoperation was 0.62% per patient-year, including 0.74% for anterior and 0.48% for posterior repairs. Cumulative incidence of reoperation at 15 years was 7.5% after anterior repair and 4.9% after posterior repair (Gray's test P = .26). Conclusions: No long-term survival or reoperation difference was found between posterior and anterior repair. On the basis of these findings, surgeons at centers of excellence should aim for repair of both anterior and posterior leaflet pathology with the same decision-making threshold over valve replacement for degenerative mitral disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1095
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of involvement of anterior leaflet versus posterior leaflet on residual regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse
    Sulcaj, Laureta
    Rizza, Antonio
    Glauber, Mattia
    Trianni, Giuseppe
    Palmieri, Cataldo
    Ravani, Marcello
    Dibra, Alban
    Maffei, Stefano
    Berti, Sergio
    CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND, 2009, 7
  • [22] Early Outcomes After Mitral Valve Repair versus Replacement in the Elderly: A Propensity Matched Analysis
    Farid, Shakil
    Ladwiniec, Andrew
    Hernandez-Sanchez, Jules
    Povey, Hannah
    Caruana, Edward
    Ali, Ayyaz
    Moorjani, Narain
    Irons, Joanne
    Ring, Liam
    Abu-Omar, Yasir
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2019, 28 (02): : 314 - 319
  • [23] Triangular resection of the anterior leaflet for repair of the mitral valve
    Fasol, R
    Joubert-Hübner, E
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 71 (01): : 381 - 383
  • [24] Mitral Valve Repair of the Anterior Leaflet: Are We There Yet?
    Bahiraie, Pegah
    Soleimani, Hamidreza
    Heydari, Narges
    Najafi, Kimia
    Karlas, Angelos
    V. Avgerinos, Dimitrios
    Samanidis, Georgios
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Doulamis, Ilias P.
    Ioannis, Iakovou
    Spilias, Nikolaos
    Hosseini, Kaveh
    Kampaktsis, Polydoros N.
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 78 : 72 - 83
  • [25] Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve repair: a propensity-matched comparison
    Wang, Qing
    Xi, Wang
    Gao, Yang
    Shen, Hua
    Min, Jie
    Yang, Jie
    Le, Shiguan
    Zhang, Yufeng
    Wang, Zhinong
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 26 (05) : 805 - 812
  • [26] Mitral valve repair for broad, asymmetrical prolapse in the posterior mitral leaflet
    Yoshikai M.
    Ohnishi H.
    Itoh M.
    Noguchi R.
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2008, 56 (3) : 137 - 139
  • [27] Posterior Mitral Leaflet Prolapse and Subsequent Mitral Valve Endocarditis Complicated With Anterior Leaflet Perforation
    Sasaki, Hideki
    Numata, Yukihide
    Saito, Jien
    Kamiya, Shinji
    Asano, Miki
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [28] Tissue versus mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50-70: a propensity-matched analysis
    Fialka, Nicholas M.
    Watkins, Abeline R.
    Alam, Abrar
    EL-Andari, Ryaan
    Kang, Jimmy J. H.
    Hong, Yongzhe
    Bozso, Sabin J.
    Moon, Michael C.
    Nagendran, Jeevan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 66 (02)
  • [29] Characteristic of myocardial work in mitral valve prolapse with versus without mitral annular disjunction: A propensity-matched study
    Ge, Zhengdan
    Ge, Zhenyi
    Hu, Chunqiang
    Wang, Yongshi
    Pan, Wenzhi
    Kong, Dehong
    Zhou, Nianwei
    Dong, Lili
    Yan, Yan
    Chen, Haiyan
    Pan, Cuizhen
    Shu, Xianhong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 414
  • [30] Repair of anterior leaflet mitral valve prolapse: Chordal replacement versus chordal shortening
    Phillips, MR
    Daly, RC
    Schaff, HV
    Dearani, JA
    Mullany, CJ
    Orszulak, TA
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 69 (01): : 25 - 29