Anterior versus posterior leaflet mitral valve repair: A propensity-matched analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Brescia, Alexander A. [1 ]
Watt, Tessa M. F. [1 ]
Rosenbloom, Liza M. [1 ]
Murray, Shannon L. [1 ]
Wu, Xiaoting [1 ]
Romano, Matthew A. [1 ]
Bolling, Steven F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Cardiac Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
关键词
mitral valve; mitral repair; degenerative mitral repair; mitral replacement; anterior leaflet; bileaflet; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE SUTURES; PROLAPSE; OUTCOMES; REGURGITATION; DURABILITY; DISEASE; SURGERY; REPLACEMENT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.148
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Mitral valve repair is superior to replacement for degenerative disease, but long-term outcomes of anterior versus posterior leaflet repair remain poorly defined. We propensity matched anterior and posterior repairs to compare long-term outcomes. Methods: Patients undergoing first-time degenerative mitral repair between 1992 and 2018 were identified. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were postprocedural residual mitral regurgitation and reoperation. From 1025 patients, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed, yielding 309 anterior (isolated anterior = 85, bileaflet = 224) and 309 isolated posterior repairs. Results: Age was 58 +/- 15 years, ejection fraction was 57% +/- 10%, and matched groups were well balanced. Anterior repairs had longer bypass (122 +/- 53 vs 109 +/- 43 minutes, P = .001) and crossclamp (94 +/- 44 vs 85 +/- 62 minutes, P = .033) times. Mean residual mitral regurgitation grade was 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.65) for anterior repair and 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.47) for posterior repair (P = .31). Overall, 92%(569/618) of matched patients had no residual mitral regurgitation, with no differences in mitral regurgitation grade between groups (P = .77). Survival did not differ between anterior (10 years: 72% +/- 7%; 15 years: 63% +/- 7%) and posterior (10 years: 74% +/- 7%; 15 years: 60% +/- 8%) groups (log-rank P = .93). Linearized incidence of reoperation was 0.62% per patient-year, including 0.74% for anterior and 0.48% for posterior repairs. Cumulative incidence of reoperation at 15 years was 7.5% after anterior repair and 4.9% after posterior repair (Gray's test P = .26). Conclusions: No long-term survival or reoperation difference was found between posterior and anterior repair. On the basis of these findings, surgeons at centers of excellence should aim for repair of both anterior and posterior leaflet pathology with the same decision-making threshold over valve replacement for degenerative mitral disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1095
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mitral valve anterior leaflet prolapse resolves following posterior leaflet repair
    Cho, L
    Gillinov, AM
    Griffin, BP
    Cosgrove, DM
    Garcia, MJ
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) : 147 - 147
  • [2] Propensity-matched analysis of robotic versus sternotomy approaches for mitral valve replacement
    Yan, Wenlong
    Wang, Yangyang
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Qingjiang
    Zheng, Xin
    Yang, Sumin
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (05) : 2375 - 2386
  • [3] Propensity-matched analysis of robotic versus sternotomy approaches for mitral valve replacement
    Wenlong Yan
    Yangyang Wang
    Wei Wang
    Qingjiang Wang
    Xin Zheng
    Sumin Yang
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 2375 - 2386
  • [4] Mitral Valve Repair for Anterior/Bileaflet Versus Posterior Leaflet Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
    Iqbal, Kinza
    Ul Haque, Ibtehaj
    Shaikh, Varisha Fatima
    Rathore, Sawai Singh
    Yasmin, Farah
    Iqbal, Ayman
    Shariff, Mariam
    Kumar, Ashish
    Stulak, John M.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (12)
  • [5] Transapical beating heart mitral valve repair versus conventional surgery: a propensity-matched study
    D'Onofrio, A.
    Mastro, F.
    Nadali, M.
    Fiocco, A.
    Pittarello, D.
    Aruta, P.
    Evangelista, G.
    Lorenzoni, G.
    Gregori, D.
    Gerosa, G.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01)
  • [6] The impact of atrial fibrillation on transcatheter mitral valve repair outcomes: A propensity-matched analysis
    Subahi, Ahmed
    Munir, Ahmad
    Abubakar, Hossam
    Akintoye, Emmanuel
    Yassin, Ahmed S.
    Adegbala, Oluwole
    Alraies, Mohamed Chadi
    Elder, Mahir
    Mohamad, Tamam
    Kaki, Amir
    Schreiber, Theodore
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (06) : 925 - 931
  • [7] Mitral valve repair and the anterior leaflet
    Letsou, GV
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 17 (02) : 179 - 182
  • [8] Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive approach versus sternotomy for mitral valve surgery
    Grant, Stuart W.
    Hickey, Graeme L.
    Modi, Paul
    Hunter, Steven
    Akowuah, Enoch
    Zacharias, Joseph
    HEART, 2019, 105 (10) : 783 - +
  • [9] Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair using a nationwide surgical database
    Hiroyuki Nishi
    Hiroaki Miyata
    Noboru Motomura
    Koichi Toda
    Shigeru Miyagawa
    Yoshiki Sawa
    Shinichi Takamoto
    Surgery Today, 2015, 45 : 1144 - 1152
  • [10] Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair using a nationwide surgical database
    Nishi, Hiroyuki
    Miyata, Hiroaki
    Motomura, Noboru
    Toda, Koichi
    Miyagawa, Shigeru
    Sawa, Yoshiki
    Takamoto, Shinichi
    SURGERY TODAY, 2015, 45 (09) : 1144 - 1152