Perioperative Outcomes of Single vs Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Experience

被引:42
|
作者
Saidian, Ava [1 ]
Fang, Andrew M. [1 ]
Hakim, Ornin [2 ]
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina [3 ]
Nix, Jeffrey W. [1 ,4 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] UAB, ONeal Comprehens Canc Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2020年 / 204卷 / 03期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; robotic surgical procedures; minimally invasive surgical procedures;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000811
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical approach to radical prostatectomy has evolved due to advances in minimally invasive surgery, with most contemporary approaches involving the Si or Xi multi-port robotic systems. U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the single-port da Vinci (R) SP robotic platform has led to a few case series suggesting its safety and feasibility for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. However, there are no established data on perioperative outcomes comparing single-port to multi-port robotic approaches to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by 2 urological surgeons at our institution between October 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The available preoperative clinical and demographic data, operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed using the t-test, chi-square and Fisher exact statistical measures. Results: Overall 95 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution were included in our study, with 47 single-port and 48 multi-port. Preoperative clinical parameters including age, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery and biopsy grade group were similar across the 2 groups. No differences in estimated blood loss (169.2 +/- 114.2 vs 157.7 +/- 125.4 ml, p=0.64), operative time (255.9 +/- 44.1 vs 274.7 +/- 50.4 minutes, p=0.06), length of hospitalization (1.1 +/- 0.5 vs 1.4 +/- 1.1 days, p=0.17), rate of perioperative inpatient Clavien-Dindo complications 2 or greater (4.3% vs 6.3% p=0.66) and rate of positive pathological margin (21.3% vs 27.1%, p=0.51) were noted comparing the single-port and multi-port approaches, respectively. Conclusions: The single-port robotic system allows a feasible approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and has operative and perioperative outcomes comparable to those of the well accepted multi-port robotic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 495
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT AND MULTI-PORT ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE
    Saidian, Ava
    Fang, Andrew
    Hakim, Ornin
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E900 - E901
  • [2] PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF SINGLE-PORT AND MULTI-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A SINGLE-INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISON ANALYSIS
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Mikesell, Carter
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E604 - E604
  • [3] Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and "Multi-Port" Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where do we stand?
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Garisto, Juan
    Bove, Pierluigi
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Rocco, Bernardo
    UROLOGY, 2021, 155 : 138 - 143
  • [4] Perioperative results of single-port vs multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via peritoneal approach: a meta-analysis
    Zongying Lv
    Guiyuan Chen
    Yugen Li
    Junyang Li
    Anneng Hu
    Xiaodong Yu
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 1309 - 1318
  • [5] Perioperative results of single-port vs multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via peritoneal approach: a meta-analysis
    Lv, Zongying
    Chen, Guiyuan
    Li, Yugen
    Li, Junyang
    Hu, Anneng
    Yu, Xiaodong
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (04) : 1309 - 1318
  • [6] A comparative analysis of single port versus multi-port robotic assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Walsh, Anna L.
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2020, 61 (04) : 335 - 337
  • [7] Comparing the Incidence of Incisional Hernia after Single-Port vs Multi-Port Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Norton, John C.
    Compher, Tyler
    Burns, Zachary R.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Parmar, Abhishek
    Rais-bahrami, Soroush
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S577 - S577
  • [8] Comparison of single-port and multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?
    Li, Jinze
    Cao, Dehong
    Huang, Yin
    Wei, Qiang
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2022, 11 (06) : 906 - 907
  • [9] COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE AND SHORT-TERM FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT TRANSVESICAL AND MULTI-PORT TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E984 - E984
  • [10] Perioperative outcomes of single-port robotic assisted partial nephrectomy compared to multi-port robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy
    Mehrazin, R.
    Altschuler, J.
    Ranti, D.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83