A comparison of reconstruction algorithms with FDG PET. Iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction (IRSAC) allows greater detectability than filtered back projection (FBP).

被引：0
|
作者：
Akhurst, T
Erdi, Y
Colsher, J
Crandall, P
MacApinlac, H
Humm, J
Yeung, H
Larson, SM
机构：
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] GE Med Syst, Milwaukee, WI USA
来源：
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE | 1999年 / 26卷 / 09期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要：
OS267
引用
收藏
页码：1027 / 1027
页数：1
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] FDG-PET standardized uptake values (SUVs) in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction (IRSAC) and filtered back projection (FBP).
    Ramos, CD
    Erdi, YE
    Gonen, M
    Riedel, E
    Yeung, HW
    Macapinlac, HA
    Chisin, R
    Larson, SM
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 41 (05) : 282P - 282P
  • [2] Comparison of SUV obtained from filtered back projection with measured attenuation correction and iterative reconstruction with segmented attenuation correction.
    Kim, CK
    Chun, H
    Almeida, O
    Krynyckyi, BR
    Knesaurek, K
    Machac, J
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 44 (05) : 62P - 62P
  • [3] FDG-PET standardized uptake values in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction and filtered back-projection
    Ramos, CD
    Erdi, YE
    Gonen, M
    Riedel, E
    Yeung, HWD
    Macapinlac, HA
    Chisin, R
    Larson, SM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (02) : 155 - 164
  • [4] FDG-PET standardized uptake values in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction and filtered back-projection
    Celso D. Ramos
    Yusuf E. Erdi
    Mithat Gonen
    Elyn Riedel
    Henry W. D. Yeung
    Homer A. Macapinlac
    Roland Chisin
    Steven M. Larson
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2001, 28 : 155 - 164
  • [5] The influence of filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction on partial volume correction in PET
    Kops, ER
    Krause, BJ
    NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 44 (03): : 99 - 106
  • [6] Local detection of prostate cancer by positron emission tomography with 2-fluorodeoxyglucose: comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction with segmented attenuation correction
    Turlakow, A
    Larson, SM
    Coakley, F
    Akhurst, T
    Gonen, M
    Macapinlac, HA
    Kelly, W
    Leibel, S
    Humm, J
    Scardino, P
    Scher, H
    Hricak, H
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 45 (03): : 235 - 244
  • [7] OS-EM reconstruction vs. filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction for neurologic FDG PET studies: Improved image quality?
    Fulton, RR
    Meikle, SR
    Hooper, PK
    Eberl, S
    Silver, KM
    Fulham, MJ
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (05) : 872 - 872
  • [8] Clinical significance of quantitative differences in FDG lymph node uptake during early HIV infection: Iterative reconstruction with segmented attenuation correction versus filtered back projection with measured attenuation correction.
    Chin, B
    Iyengar, S
    Schwartz, D
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 42 (05) : 192P - 193P
  • [9] Deep learning reconstruction allows for usage of contrast agent of lower concentration for coronary CTA than filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction
    Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar
    Ryu, Jae-Kyun
    Shin, Jaemin
    Kim, Han Myun
    Seo, Jung Wook
    Shim, Hackjoon
    Hwang, Dae Hyun
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2023, 64 (03) : 1007 - 1017
  • [10] Comparison of a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm with Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Pediatric Abdominopelvic CT
    Son, Wookon
    Kim, MinWoo
    Hwang, Jae-Yeon
    Kim, Yong-Woo
    Park, Chankue
    Choo, Ki Seok
    Kim, Tae Un
    Jang, Joo Yeon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 23 (07) : 752 - 762
1234