Deep learning reconstruction allows for usage of contrast agent of lower concentration for coronary CTA than filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction

被引:6
|
作者
Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar [1 ]
Ryu, Jae-Kyun [2 ]
Shin, Jaemin [3 ]
Kim, Han Myun [4 ]
Seo, Jung Wook [5 ]
Shim, Hackjoon [2 ,6 ]
Hwang, Dae Hyun [4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Canon Med Syst Korea, Med Imaging AI Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Dept Neurol, Guro Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Hallym Univ, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 1 Singil Ro, Seoul 07441, South Korea
[5] Inje Univ, Dept Radiol, Ilsan Paik Hosp, Goyang, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, ConnectAI Res Ctr, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Contrast media; image quality; multidetector computed tomography; image reconstruction; coronary; LOW-TUBE-VOLTAGE; IMAGE QUALITY; DYNAMIC CT; ANGIOGRAPHY; MEDIA; PROTOCOL; HEART; TIME;
D O I
10.1177/02841851221118476
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The demand for homogeneous and higher vascular contrast enhancement is critical to provide an appropriate interpretation of abnormal vascular findings in coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Purpose To evaluate the effect of various contrast media concentrations (Iohexol-370, Iohexol-300, Iohexol-240) and image reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], hybrid iterative reconstruction [IR], and deep learning reconstruction [DLR]) on coronary CTA. Material and Methods A total of 63 patients referred for coronary CTA between July and October 2021 were enrolled in this prospective study, and they randomly received one of three contrast media. CTA images were reconstructed with FBP, hybrid IR, and DLR. The CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for all three images. The images were subjectively evaluated by two radiologists in terms of overall image quality, artifacts, image noise, and vessel wall delineation on a 5-point Likert scale. Results The application of DLR resulted in significantly lower image noise; higher CT attenuation, SNR, and CNR; and better subjective analysis among the three different concentrations of contrast media groups (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the CT attenuation of the left ventricle (P = 0.089) and coronary arteries (P = 0.072) between hybrid IR at Iohexol-300 and DLR at Iohexol-240. Furthermore, application of DLR to the Iohexol-240 significantly improved SNR and CNR; it achieved higher subjective scores compared with hybrid IR at Iohexol-300 (P < 0.001). Conclusion We suggest that using DLR with Iohexol-240 contrast media is preferable to hybrid IR with Iohexol-300 contrast media in coronary CTA.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1017
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison between filtered-back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and deep learning reconstruction techniques
    Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar
    Jeon, Pil-Hyun
    Ryu, Jae-Kyun
    Shim, Hackjoon
    Jeon, Sang-Hyun
    Ko, Sung Min
    Kim, Hyunjung
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2023, 64 (08) : 2393 - 2400
  • [2] Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection
    Cha, Min Jae
    Seo, Jae Seung
    Yoo, Dong Soo
    Chong, Semin
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (03) : 280 - 286
  • [3] Comparison of a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm with Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Pediatric Abdominopelvic CT
    Son, Wookon
    Kim, MinWoo
    Hwang, Jae-Yeon
    Kim, Yong-Woo
    Park, Chankue
    Choo, Ki Seok
    Kim, Tae Un
    Jang, Joo Yeon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 23 (07) : 752 - 762
  • [4] A comparison of reconstruction algorithms with FDG PET. Iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction (IRSAC) allows greater detectability than filtered back projection (FBP).
    Akhurst, T
    Erdi, Y
    Colsher, J
    Crandall, P
    MacApinlac, H
    Humm, J
    Yeung, H
    Larson, SM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 26 (09): : 1027 - 1027
  • [5] The potential for reduced radiation dose from deep learning-based CT image reconstruction A comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction using a phantom
    Lee, Ji Eun
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Lim, Sanghyeok
    Lee, Min Hee
    Ha Yi, Boem
    Cha, Jang Gyu
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (19) : E25814
  • [6] Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium
    Takahashi, Masahiro
    Kimura, Fumiko
    Umezawa, Tatsuya
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Ogawa, Harumi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 10 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [7] Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT
    Obmann, V. C.
    Klink, T.
    Heverhagen, J. T.
    Stork, A.
    Laqmani, A.
    Adam, G.
    Begemann, P. G. C.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2015, 187 (05): : 372 - 379
  • [8] Coronary plaque detection in low-dose CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection
    Schmid, J.
    Layritz, C.
    Marwan, M.
    Mitschke, M.
    Pflederer, T.
    Ropers, D.
    Achenbach, S.
    Schuhbaeck, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 624 - 624
  • [9] Comparison of Image Noise in Dual Energy CT Images Reconstructed Using Filtered Back-Projection, Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction, and Deep Learning Methods
    Prakash, P.
    Nett, B.
    Tang, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E521 - E521
  • [10] Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary CT Angiography: Comparison of Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction With Different Strengths
    Wang, Rui
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Wu, Runze
    Nance, John W., Jr.
    Lv, Biao
    Yang, Hua
    Li, Fang
    Lu, Dongxu
    Zhang, Zhaoqi
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (02) : 179 - 184