Deep learning reconstruction allows for usage of contrast agent of lower concentration for coronary CTA than filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction

被引:6
|
作者
Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar [1 ]
Ryu, Jae-Kyun [2 ]
Shin, Jaemin [3 ]
Kim, Han Myun [4 ]
Seo, Jung Wook [5 ]
Shim, Hackjoon [2 ,6 ]
Hwang, Dae Hyun [4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Canon Med Syst Korea, Med Imaging AI Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Dept Neurol, Guro Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Hallym Univ, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 1 Singil Ro, Seoul 07441, South Korea
[5] Inje Univ, Dept Radiol, Ilsan Paik Hosp, Goyang, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, ConnectAI Res Ctr, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Contrast media; image quality; multidetector computed tomography; image reconstruction; coronary; LOW-TUBE-VOLTAGE; IMAGE QUALITY; DYNAMIC CT; ANGIOGRAPHY; MEDIA; PROTOCOL; HEART; TIME;
D O I
10.1177/02841851221118476
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The demand for homogeneous and higher vascular contrast enhancement is critical to provide an appropriate interpretation of abnormal vascular findings in coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Purpose To evaluate the effect of various contrast media concentrations (Iohexol-370, Iohexol-300, Iohexol-240) and image reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], hybrid iterative reconstruction [IR], and deep learning reconstruction [DLR]) on coronary CTA. Material and Methods A total of 63 patients referred for coronary CTA between July and October 2021 were enrolled in this prospective study, and they randomly received one of three contrast media. CTA images were reconstructed with FBP, hybrid IR, and DLR. The CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for all three images. The images were subjectively evaluated by two radiologists in terms of overall image quality, artifacts, image noise, and vessel wall delineation on a 5-point Likert scale. Results The application of DLR resulted in significantly lower image noise; higher CT attenuation, SNR, and CNR; and better subjective analysis among the three different concentrations of contrast media groups (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the CT attenuation of the left ventricle (P = 0.089) and coronary arteries (P = 0.072) between hybrid IR at Iohexol-300 and DLR at Iohexol-240. Furthermore, application of DLR to the Iohexol-240 significantly improved SNR and CNR; it achieved higher subjective scores compared with hybrid IR at Iohexol-300 (P < 0.001). Conclusion We suggest that using DLR with Iohexol-240 contrast media is preferable to hybrid IR with Iohexol-300 contrast media in coronary CTA.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1017
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deep learning-based reconstruction on cardiac CT yields distinct radiomic features compared to iterative and filtered back projection reconstructions
    Sei Hyun Chun
    Young Joo Suh
    Kyunghwa Han
    Yonghan Kwon
    Aaron Youngjae Kim
    Byoung Wook Choi
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [22] Coronary CT angiography: Comparison of a novel iterative reconstruction with filtered back projection for reconstruction of low-dose CT-Initial experience
    Takx, Richard A. P.
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Moscariello, Antonio
    Das, Marco
    Rowe, Garrett
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Fink, Christian
    Henzler, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (02) : 275 - 280
  • [23] Comparisons of Image Quality and Radiation Dose Between Iterative Reconstruction and Filtered Back Projection Reconstruction Algorithms in 256-MDCT Coronary Angiography
    Hou, Yang
    Liu, Xin
    Xv, Shu
    Guo, Wenli
    Guo, Qiyong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (03) : 588 - 594
  • [24] Image quality of ct angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction in infants with congenital heart disease: Comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction
    Jia, Qianjun
    Zhuang, Jian
    Jiang, Jun
    Li, Jiahua
    Huang, Meiping
    Liang, Changhong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 86 : 190 - 197
  • [25] CT coronary angiography: Image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection
    Wang, R.
    Schoepf, U. J.
    Wu, R.
    Gibbs, K. P.
    Yu, W.
    Li, M.
    Zhang, Z.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (03) : 272 - 278
  • [26] Evaluation of Heavily Calcified Vessels with Coronary CT Angiography: Comparison of Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Image Reconstruction Techniques
    Renker, Matthias
    Schoepf, U. J.
    Weininger, Markus
    Kerl, J. M.
    Bauer, Ralf W.
    Henzler, Thomas
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [27] In Vitro Study of the Precision and Accuracy of Measurement of the Vascular Inner Diameter on Computed Tomography Angiography Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction: Comparison With Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction
    Suzuki, Shigeru
    Samejima, Wakana
    Harashima, Shingo
    Fukui, Rika
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 46 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [28] Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: Image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region
    Katsura, Masaki
    Sato, Jiro
    Akahane, Masaaki
    Matsuda, Izuru
    Ishida, Masanori
    Yasaka, Koichiro
    Kunimatsu, Akira
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (02) : 356 - 360
  • [29] Comparative assessment of noise properties for two deep learning CT image reconstruction techniques and filtered back projection
    Kawashima, Hiroki
    Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
    Takata, Tadanori
    Seto, Issei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (10) : 6359 - 6367
  • [30] Superior objective and subjective image quality of deep learning reconstruction for low-dose abdominal CT imaging in comparison with model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection
    Tamura, Akio
    Mukaida, Eisuke
    Ota, Yoshitaka
    Kamata, Masayoshi
    Abe, Shun
    Yoshioka, Kunihiro
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1123):