Evaluations of Low-cost Air Quality Sensors for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) under Indoor and Outdoor Conditions

被引:5
|
作者
Rabuan, Utbah [1 ]
Nadzir, Mohd Shahrul Mohd [1 ]
Sham, Siti Zahanah Abdullah [1 ]
Bahri, Sharifah Batrisyia Izzati Wan Shaiful [1 ]
Borah, Jintu [2 ]
Majumdar, Shubhankar [2 ]
Lei, Thomas M. T. [3 ]
Ali, Sawal Hamid Md [4 ]
Wahab, Muhammad Ikram A. [5 ]
Yunus, Noor Hidayah Mohd [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Earth Sci & Environm, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Natl Inst Technol Meghalaya, Bijni Complex Laitumkhrah, Shillong 793003, Meghalaya, India
[3] Univ St Joseph, Inst Sci & Environm, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Dept Elect Elect & Syst Engn, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Hlth Sci, Ctr Toxicol & Hlth Risk Studies CORE, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
[6] Univ Kuala Lumpur, Commun Technol Sect, Adv Telecommun Technol, British Malaysian Inst, Batu 8, Jalan Sungai Pusu, Gombak 53100, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
low-cost sensors; particulate matter (PM2.5); sensor comparison and reference analyzer; POLLUTION; PERFORMANCE; AMBIENT; CALIBRATION; URBAN; MASS;
D O I
10.18494/SAM4393
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Air quality (AQ) monitoring is crucial for maintaining human health and well-being, whether outdoors or indoors. Particulate matter (PM) is among the most critical parameters that must be routinely monitored. Traditional reference particulate analyzers are expensive and difficult to deploy on a large scale, leading to poor spatial and temporal AQ information. However, the reliability and accuracy of these sensors are yet to be established. This study is aimed at assessing the performance of five low-cost sensors by comparing them with a particulate reference analyzer for AQ monitoring in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)-recommended guidelines. The sensors were tested for indoor and outdoor environments using simple linear regression (SLR) models. The results indicate that low-cost sensors are unreliable for accurately measuring AQ in indoor environments. The correlation between the sensors and the reference analyzer was poor, with coefficient of determination (R-2) values ranging from 0.2 to 0.58 during the three-week analysis period for a 1-h average. However, after increasing the average time interval, the sensor (HPMA115) satisfied the US EPA-recommended guideline with an R-2 value of 0.72. Root-mean-square error (RMSE) values for some sensors exceeded the US EPA guideline of less than 7 mu gm(-3) for PM sensors. The concentration of PM2.5, indoor relative humidity (RH), and temperature were identified as potential factors contributing to sensor behavior. The air conditioning system also affected the sensor performance, with variations in RH and temperature observed between tests with and without occupants. The results showed that low-cost sensors could be utilized for outdoor environments, with Honeywell's HPMA115 performing well. However, the calibration process must be performed for each specific environment. Our findings highlighted the limitations of low-cost sensors for AQ monitoring and the need for further research to develop reliable sensors.
引用
收藏
页码:2881 / 2895
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Temporal and spatial variation of PM2.5 in indoor air monitored by low-cost sensors
    Shen, Huizhong
    Hou, Weiying
    Zhu, Yaqi
    Zheng, Shuxiu
    Ainiwaer, Subinuer
    Shen, Guofeng
    Chen, Yilin
    Cheng, Hefa
    Hu, Jianying
    Wan, Yi
    Tao, Shu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 770
  • [2] The Influence of Outdoor Particulate Matter PM2.5 on Indoor Air Quality: The Implementation of a New Assessment Method
    Bekierski, Dominik
    Kostyrko, Krystyna Barbara
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (19)
  • [3] Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors
    Chu, Hone-Jay
    Ali, Muhammad Zeeshan
    He, Yu-Chen
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [4] Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors
    Hone-Jay Chu
    Muhammad Zeeshan Ali
    Yu-Chen He
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [5] Network of low-cost air quality sensors for monitoring indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 exposure in Seattle during the 2020 wildfire season
    He, Jiayang
    Huang, Ching-Hsuan
    Yuan, Nanhsun
    Austin, Elena
    Seto, Edmund
    Novosselov, Igor
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 285
  • [6] On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations
    deSouza, Priyanka
    Kinney, Patrick L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 514 - 524
  • [7] On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations
    Priyanka deSouza
    Patrick L. Kinney
    [J]. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2021, 31 : 514 - 524
  • [8] A low-cost particulate matter (PM2.5) monitor for wildland fire smoke
    Kelleher, Scott
    Quinn, Casey
    Miller-Lionberg, Daniel
    Volckens, John
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2018, 11 (02) : 1087 - 1097
  • [9] Monitoring and apportioning sources of indoor air quality using low-cost particulate matter sensors
    Bousiotis, Dimitrios
    Alconcel, Leah-Nani S.
    Beddows, David C. S.
    Harrison, Roy M.
    Pope, Francis D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 174
  • [10] Outdoor PM2.5 air filtration: optimising indoor air quality and energy
    Belias, Evangelos
    Licina, Dusan
    [J]. BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2022, 3 (01): : 186 - 203