Temporal and spatial variation of PM2.5 in indoor air monitored by low-cost sensors

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Huizhong [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Weiying [1 ]
Zhu, Yaqi [1 ]
Zheng, Shuxiu [1 ]
Ainiwaer, Subinuer [1 ]
Shen, Guofeng [1 ]
Chen, Yilin [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Hefa [1 ]
Hu, Jianying [1 ]
Wan, Yi [1 ]
Tao, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Sino French Inst Earth Syst Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Indoor air quality; Particulate matter; Spatial distribution; Temporal trend; Low-cost sensor; Cooking; PARTICULATE MATTER; PARTICLES; EXPOSURE; QUALITY; HOMES; POLLUTANTS; COOKING; OUTDOOR; DETERMINANTS; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145304
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Indoor air pollution has significant adverse health impacts, but its spatiotemporal variations and source contributions are not well quantified. In this study, we used low-cost sensors to measure PM2.5 concentrations in a typical apartment in Beijing. The measurements were conducted at 15 indoor sites and one outdoor site on 1-minute temporal resolution (convert to 10-minute averages for data analysis) from March 14 to 24, 2020. Based on these highly spatially-and temporally-resolved data, we characterized spatiotemporal variations and source contributions of indoor PM2.5 in this apartment. It was found that indoor particulate matter predominantly originates from outdoor infiltration and cooking emissions with the latter contributing more fine particles. Indoor PM2.5 concentrations were found to be correlated with ambient levels but were generally lower than those outdoors with an average I/O of 0.85. The predominant indoor source was cooking, leading to occasional high spikes. The variations observed in most rooms lagged behind those measured outdoors and in the studied kitchen. Differences between rooms were found to depend on pathway distances from sources. On average, outdoor sources contributed 36% of indoor PM2.5, varying extensively over time and among rooms. From observed PM2.5 concentrations at the indoor sites, source strengths, and pathway distances, a multivariate regression model was developed to predict spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5. The model explains 79% of the observed variation and can be used to dynamically simulate PM2.5 concentrations at any site indoors. The model's simplicity suggests the potential for regional-scale application for indoor air quality modeling. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors
    Chu, Hone-Jay
    Ali, Muhammad Zeeshan
    He, Yu-Chen
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [2] Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors
    Hone-Jay Chu
    Muhammad Zeeshan Ali
    Yu-Chen He
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [3] Concentration-Temporal Multilevel Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors
    Day, Rong-Fuh
    Yin, Peng-Yeng
    Huang, Yuh-Chin T.
    Wang, Cheng-Yi
    Tsai, Chih-Chun
    Yu, Cheng-Hsien
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [4] Evaluations of Low-cost Air Quality Sensors for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) under Indoor and Outdoor Conditions
    Rabuan, Utbah
    Nadzir, Mohd Shahrul Mohd
    Sham, Siti Zahanah Abdullah
    Bahri, Sharifah Batrisyia Izzati Wan Shaiful
    Borah, Jintu
    Majumdar, Shubhankar
    Lei, Thomas M. T.
    Ali, Sawal Hamid Md
    Wahab, Muhammad Ikram A.
    Yunus, Noor Hidayah Mohd
    [J]. SENSORS AND MATERIALS, 2023, 35 (08) : 2881 - 2895
  • [5] Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM2.5 Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors
    Mukherjee, Anondo
    Brown, Steven G.
    McCarthy, Michael C.
    Pavlovic, Nathan R.
    Stanton, Levi G.
    Snyder, Janice Lam
    D'Andrea, Stephen
    Hafner, Hilary R.
    [J]. SENSORS, 2019, 19 (21)
  • [6] On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations
    deSouza, Priyanka
    Kinney, Patrick L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 514 - 524
  • [7] On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations
    Priyanka deSouza
    Patrick L. Kinney
    [J]. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2021, 31 : 514 - 524
  • [8] Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring
    Badura, Marek
    Batog, Piotr
    Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, Anetta
    Modzel, Piotr
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2018, 2018
  • [9] Assessing low-cost sensor for characterizing temporal variation of PM2.5 in Bandung, Indonesia
    Kurniawati, Syukria
    Santoso, Muhayatun
    Nurhaini, Feni Fernita
    Atmodjo, Djoko Prakoso D.
    Lestiani, Diah Dwiana
    Ramadhani, Moch Faizal
    Kusmartini, Indah
    Syahfitri, Woro Yatu N.
    Damastuti, Endah
    Tursinah, Rasito
    [J]. KUWAIT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2025, 52 (01)
  • [10] Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site
    Feenstra, Brandon
    Papapostolou, Vasileios
    Hasheminassab, Sina
    Zhang, Hang
    Boghossian, Berj Der
    Cocker, David
    Polidori, Andrea
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 216