Factors affecting women's decision between uterine-preserving versus hysterectomy-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

被引:4
|
作者
Ramage, Kaylee [1 ]
Ducey, Ariel [2 ]
Scime, Natalie, V [1 ,3 ]
Knox, Erin [2 ]
Brennand, Erin A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Arts, Dept Sociol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 2500 Univ Dr Northwest, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
hysterectomy; pelvic organ prolapse; shared decision-making; surgery; uterine preservation; LIFETIME RISK; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/17455057231181015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background:Given the prevalence of women seeking surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), there is a need to understand women's decision-making regarding uterine-preserving versus hysterectomy-based surgeries. Historically, hysterectomy-based surgeries have been the preferred treatment for pelvic organ prolapse; however, contemporary evidence supports uterine-preserving surgeries as equivalent. At present, the lack of information available to the general public and limited options presented at surgical consultation for pelvic organ prolapse may hinder women's autonomy as they navigate surgical treatment. Objectives:To examine the factors affecting women's decision-making processes regarding uterine-preserving or hysterectomy-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Design:This is a qualitative study. Methods:We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with women seeking surgery for pelvic organ prolapse to explore the factors affecting women's decision-making between hysterectomy-based and uterine-preserving surgeries. Results:Women (n = 26) used clinical and personal factors to determine which surgery was best. Women noted that the lack of evidence (clinical and/or anecdotal) available to them hindered their decision-making, causing them to rely more on their own interpretations of the evidence, what they perceived to be "normal," and what their surgeon recommended. Even with standardized discussion regarding the existing clinical equipoise between surgeries at the clinical consultation, some women still had misperceptions that hysterectomy-based surgery would convey the lowest risk of prolapse recurrence and be best for severe prolapse. Conclusion:There is a need for more transparency in discussions about prolapse and the factors affecting women's decision-making for surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Clinicians should be prepared to offer the option of hysterectomy-based or uterine-preserving surgeries and to clearly explain the clinical equipoise between these procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A new technique for uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery: Laparoscopic rectus abdominis hysteropexy for uterine prolapse by comparing with traditional techniques
    Li, Zijun
    Zheng, Yaqin
    Shen, Fangrong
    Liu, Ming
    Zhou, Ying
    [J]. OPEN MEDICINE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [2] Uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the UPHOLD LITE vaginal support system The outcomes of 291 patients
    Chang, Chia-Pei
    Hsu, Fang-Kuo
    Lai, Man-Jung
    Chang, Wen-Hsun
    Lee, Na-Rong
    Lee, Hui-Ling
    Horng, Huann-Cheng
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (14)
  • [3] Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
    Korbly, Nicole B.
    Kassis, Nadine C.
    Good, Meadow M.
    Richardson, Monica L.
    Book, Nicole M.
    Yip, Sallis
    Saguan, Docile
    Gross, Carey
    Evans, Janelle
    Lopes, Vrishali V.
    Harvie, Heidi S.
    Sung, Vivian W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (05)
  • [4] Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Techniques for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Hysterectomy-based Approach
    Edwards, A.
    Ramirez, Carter A.
    Kim-Fine, S.
    Scime, N., V
    Brennand, E. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S392 - S393
  • [5] ROLE OF UTERINE PRESERVING SURGERY IN MESH BASED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE REPAIR.
    Forde, James
    Chughtai, Bilal
    Stone, Benjamin
    Hsu, Wei-Chun
    Mao, Jialin
    Te, Alexis
    Sedrakyan, Art
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E105 - E105
  • [6] Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse
    Hickman, Lisa C.
    Tran, Misha C.
    Paraiso, Marie Fidela R.
    Walters, Mark D.
    Ferrando, Cecile A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (07) : 2005 - 2012
  • [7] Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse
    Lisa C. Hickman
    Misha C. Tran
    Marie Fidela R. Paraiso
    Mark D. Walters
    Cecile A. Ferrando
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 2005 - 2012
  • [8] Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines
    Meriwether, Kate V.
    Balk, Ethan M.
    Antosh, Danielle D.
    Olivera, Cedric K.
    Kim-Fine, Shunaha
    Murphy, Miles
    Grimes, Cara L.
    Sleemi, Ambereen
    Singh, Ruchira
    Dieter, Alexis A.
    Crisp, Catrina C.
    Rahn, David D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (04) : 505 - 522
  • [9] Incidence of Occult Uterine Pathology in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
    Ackenbom, Mary F.
    Giugale, Lauren E.
    Wang, Yanting
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (05): : 332 - 335
  • [10] Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines
    Kate V. Meriwether
    Ethan M. Balk
    Danielle D. Antosh
    Cedric K. Olivera
    Shunaha Kim-Fine
    Miles Murphy
    Cara L. Grimes
    Ambereen Sleemi
    Ruchira Singh
    Alexis A. Dieter
    Catrina C. Crisp
    David D. Rahn
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2019, 30 : 505 - 522